Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

If you guys are talking about the windows phone images, that's what it could look like with transparent live tiles which are rumored to be coming to Windows 10. Remember the news about them on the Xbox One dashboard? It's be a nice option to have, would open it up to more personalization.

 

As far as IE goes, we know 12 will have a totally new UI, not just a tweaked one. The html5 spec is now finally locked down from what I remember so they can and should be adding in more support than in previous updates. Rumors of extensions have been floating around but nothing solid yet, they're doing a good job of keeping it under lock and key for now.

 

I think with windows 10 and IE12 we'll get one version of the browser this time, but with a UI that can scale/change between desktop and tablet/phone usage. It won't be the two different browsers we get in windows 8, even though they both use the same trident engine.

I think with windows 10 and IE12 we'll get one version of the browser this time, but with a UI that can scale/change between desktop and tablet/phone usage. It won't be the two different browsers we get in windows 8, even though they both use the same trident engine.

Microsoft already confirmed that that wouldn't be the case in Windows 10 anymore. We get one version, based on WinRT, and that's it. For the engine. It's actualy Edge now (in IE12), not Trident.

  • Like 2

Microsoft already confirmed that that wouldn't be the case in Windows 10 anymore. We get one version, based on WinRT, and that's it. For the engine. It's actualy Edge now (in IE12), not Trident.

I don't remember that but it works out for the best in the end.

I don't remember that but it works out for the best in the end.

 

Anyone know if they're working on extensible URL parsing, like Android has (IOS too I'll presume?)?

 

My #1 gripe with the WP/W8 experience is that it doesn't matter how good (or not) core web-replacement apps are (e.g. YouTube, Tapatalk etc.), URLs pertaining to these 'sites' always open the site in IE, not any platform-tailored app installed (Android detects these and offers a 'Chrome or x? prompt' .  The exception seems to be Wikipedia URLs, oddly, which open the native app (so the mechanics are there, somewhat).

 

Obviously we've seen no changes to Modern in W10TP - fingers-Xd they've recognised this.  Then, WP apps that can do multimedia actions on a schedule (i.e. Alarm)....

I don't remember that but it works out for the best in the end.

A quote from the IE blog:

@Dan/Yannick: As you saw in other Windows 10 announcements yesterday and today, universal apps and the unification of the mouse/keyboard and touch environments are big themes for Windows 10. We're working to move the IE experience in a consistent direction. The removal of the second browser is just the first of many steps on that path. Stay tuned!

The zSpartan app is the next IE version, and it's a WinRT based app, as there won't be a second browser, the next IE is going to be the WinRT version.
  • Like 1

A quote from the IE blog:

The zSpartan app is the next IE version, and it's a WinRT based app, as there won't be a second browser, the next IE is going to be the WinRT version.

That is definitely an awesome news, and indeed the step in the right direction. It'll be interesting to see how it will work for devices of all inputs and sizes, especially that not only it's going to be one IE for tablets or laptops/desktops (the latter with or without touch), but also for the Windows phone version too. Feature parity on all devices would create a great user experience. Also, cool devname. :D

That is definitely an awesome news, and indeed the step in the right direction. It'll be interesting to see how it will work for devices of all inputs and sizes, especially that not only it's going to be one IE for tablets or laptops/desktops (the latter with or without touch), but also for the Windows phone version too. Feature parity on all devices would create a great user experience. Also, cool devname. :D

 

It should also mean that moving to WinRT that all the built in applications will finally high-DPI aware rather than the mess that current exists right now. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up seeing a lot of under the hood changes occurring with explorer given that it appears that instability probably comes down to changes occurring underneath it all.

Microsoft already confirmed that that wouldn't be the case in Windows 10 anymore. We get one version, based on WinRT, and that's it. For the engine. It's actualy Edge now (in IE12), not Trident.

Edge is not engine, its mode.

Edge is not engine, its mode.

Another Microsoft quote:

we are enabling our new interoperability focused Edge rendering engine for 10% of Windows Insiders

Also, the UAS mentions "Edge/12.0" and no longer mentions Trident. That's the only IE reference in the new UAS. Edge is an engine.

Sweet. I was assuming IE would be a modern app only because it would need to scale to tablets and phones now at this point.

Also, how many folks (even on desktops) view Web pages windowed?  Developing Web pages for a single resolution got website administrators in hot water merely with Windows 9x/NT.  Developing a separate site for mobile is NOT the same as developing a non-full-screen version of a site - ask Neowin's own administrator that question.  Needed plug-ins (such as Flash) would likely continue to be built-in - for security reasons (that is the case with ModernUI IE today), as opposed to being modular (like desktop IE today).  And even IE becoming Modern-only won't exactly roadblock the use of other browsers - the third-party browser community is thriving; how many non-Google versions of Chrome (and non-Mozilla variants of Gecko) are floating around the Internet today, just for Windows?  It's not the Windows marketplace of even five years ago.

I kinda wonder how they'd do any plugins with it as such.

They can do "extensions" using the same type of API the charms use, like the share charm and so on.  So when you start IE those will also start up in their own sandboxes with a secure API that will pass data to them etc.

You also have a larger desktop than most - true?  Exception - not the rule; which is why I asked the question.

 

Not sure...on my primary notebook (1920x1080 ... 15inch screen) I'll run the browser windowed a lot (like I'm doing now).  Desktop...no brainer(dual 23 inch).  I do not find myself running browsers windowed on my el cheapo travel notebook (1368x768 or something).  Though I will if I'm working with another program (not ideal though because of the resolution)

 

At work...same thing...I'll run the browser windowed all the time.  Usually with Word/Excel or some other program up that I'm working with.  Some websites for work I have (to save tme) to run windowed for data comparison...for example my civilian timecards where they have to enter their time into two separate websites (silly...I know) which have to exactly match (easier said than done considering the sites are not similar).

 

I do believe I missed the meaning behind your original comment.  Are you saying most do not run browsers windowed...and that they should just be full screen?  

I am happy with the way Win 10 is going so far.

I'd also say that MS is heading in the right direction with Windows 10, it's already a great improvement over Windows 8.

One thing they still really need to do though is adding a simple way to turn off this tile crap entirely, it definitely has no place on the desktop.

 

P.S. I just thought of something. OSX is the "idiot friendly" OS (no offense to anyone, I mean it's made for any kind of user), Linux is for power users, no matter how they try to make it "user friendly", they can't dumb it down to that level. And Windows is somewhere in the middle, trying to please everyone. Tough job, no wonder that there will always be unhappy people...

"Linux is for power users" is certainly right, but I'd definitely say that Windows is the "idiot friendly" OS, as they went to great lenghts in many regards to dumb things down, especially with Windows 8. Windows is totally unsuited for power users, e.g. until not too long ago it didn't even have a proper shell, which only recently came with "Power Shell" (which still isn't all that great though).

OS X is somewhere in the middle (even though some things are also pretty dumbed down), but like Linux it's based on Unix, which gives power users much more possibilities.

 

Microsoft already confirmed that that wouldn't be the case in Windows 10 anymore. We get one version, based on WinRT, and that's it. For the engine. It's actualy Edge now (in IE12), not Trident.

That's also a great improvement. Trident was just plain awful, especially in terms of standards compatibility.

Is this whole "To tile, or not to tile" debate still going on? This discussion really needs to be moved to a more appropriate thread that can be used for debate purposes, while for the time being, this thread is used to discuss the improvements and additions that are being added through the technical preview builds, including the leaked ones.

And not about whether Windows 10 should or not replicate a very basic Windows 95 desktop metaphor whatsoever. Windows doesn't get the desktop treated the same way for Windows 10, like how it was before Windows 8, and it's not going to head back either. Tiles are a signature feature that came to PCs as well as phones before that, practically it's what makes it distinctive on its own.

Time to resume with the discussion of the thread that HAS something to do with what's coming next in Windows 10!

Another Microsoft quote:

Also, the UAS mentions "Edge/12.0" and no longer mentions Trident. That's the only IE reference in the new UAS. Edge is an engine.

 

Quoting Microsoft IE Blog:

 

 

 

Introducing the ?living? Edge document mode

The cornerstone of this update to IE is the ?Edge? mode platform?a new document mode designed with interoperability at its core. 

 

 

 

Given the sheer volume of changes in Edge mode, we?re going to progressively roll out the new mode by choosing a random set of Windows Insiders to get Edge while the rest remain in 11 document mode.

 

Source: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/11/11/living-on-the-edge-our-next-step-in-interoperability.aspx

 

UA String for Windows Phone 8.1 Update (aka GDR1)

 

 

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 8.1; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11; IEMobile/11.0) like Android 4.1.2; compatible) like iPhone OS 7_0_3 Mac OS X WebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari /537.36

 

Source: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/hh869301%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

 

For desktop, they do changed UA String and removed Trident Engine but I still believe its Trident engine rather than Edge Engine, Although its confusing, I would try to reach out for other information.

I'd also say that MS is heading in the right direction with Windows 10, it's already a great improvement over Windows 8.

One thing they still really need to do though is adding a simple way to turn off this tile crap entirely, it definitely has no place on the desktop.

 

"Linux is for power users" is certainly right, but I'd definitely say that Windows is the "idiot friendly" OS, as they went to great lenghts in many regards to dumb things down, especially with Windows 8. Windows is totally unsuited for power users, e.g. until not too long ago it didn't even have a proper shell, which only recently came with "Power Shell" (which still isn't all that great though).

OS X is somewhere in the middle (even though some things are also pretty dumbed down), but like Linux it's based on Unix, which gives power users much more possibilities.

 

That's also a great improvement. Trident was just plain awful, especially in terms of standards compatibility.

I remember people calling Windows 98,2000,XP,Vista,7,8 "dumbed down". I guess you are part of the same bandwagon for Windows 10. Welcome, you will find some friends here for sure.

Powershell isn't exactly "recent". It works pretty well for those who know how to use it. ;)

PowerShell was first released back in 2006 for XP SP2, if that's recent then my sense of time must be shot to hell.

 

There's a preview of version 5.0 out tight now for those who want to try it, probably what will ship with Windows 10 next year.

Nope..

 

Linux=Hobbiest.(tech\server minded)

Windows=Power user.(tons of workstation apps)

Osx=Dumb down basic use.(lack of apps)

I'd also say that MS is heading in the right direction with Windows 10, it's already a great improvement over Windows 8.
One thing they still really need to do though is adding a simple way to turn off this tile crap entirely, it definitely has no place on the desktop.
 


"Linux is for power users" is certainly right, but I'd definitely say that Windows is the "idiot friendly" OS, as they went to great lenghts in many regards to dumb things down, especially with Windows 8. Windows is totally unsuited for power users, e.g. until not too long ago it didn't even have a proper shell, which only recently came with "Power Shell" (which still isn't all that great though).
OS X is somewhere in the middle (even though some things are also pretty dumbed down), but like Linux it's based on Unix, which gives power users much more possibilities.
 


That's also a great improvement. Trident was just plain awful, especially in terms of standards compatibility.

  • Like 3

PowerShell was first released back in 2006 for XP SP2, if that's recent then my sense of time must be shot to hell.

 

There's a preview of version 5.0 out tight now for those who want to try it, probably what will ship with Windows 10 next year.

Interesting. So the preview was released for it during this April, along with Windows Management Framework 5.0. Which is also when they started adding support for OneGet and the support for the Chocolatey package repository. In this case, PowerShell 5.0 will indeed be a part of Windows 10.

Interesting. So the preview was released for it during this April, along with Windows Management Framework 5.0. Which is also when they started adding support for OneGet and the support for the Chocolatey package repository. In this case, PowerShell 5.0 will indeed be a part of Windows 10.

WPS was indeed made part of Windows as of XP's rather infamous Service Pack 2; it was designed as a replacement for the DOS-style batch file and a scripting language that would be supported on all versions of Windows.  Where WPS took off is on the server/administrative side of Windows (most of the books about WPS have to do with scripting for servers) despite it not having gone away on the desktop - remember, the desktop and server flavors of Windows have been based on the same code since Vista/Server 2003R2.  The inclusion of WPS in Windows 10 addresses the two flavors of Windows where WPS is conspicuous by its absence - Windows Phone and Xbox.  Windows Phone needs it for the same reason servers and desktops do - administrative use.  (I have to wonder what XBOX will do with it, though.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!