Recommended Posts

My guess, non GTO launch to allow a re-examination of a landed reused core. Customer probably not SES and may very well be existing customer in the lineup to be launched in the next 6 months.

 

:)

From double to triple: Why the landing Falcon 9 creates three sonic booms

 

Quote

One of the iconic sounds of the Space Shuttle era has returned to the Space Coast—the sonic boom. The returning Shuttle orbiter produced a signature double sonic boom on its approach to Kennedy Space Center’s Shuttle Landing Facility. Similar sounds were heard again in the early morning hours of July 18 as SpaceX’s Falcon 9 first stage returned to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s (CCAFS) Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1), formerly Launch Complex 13, creating a triple sonic boom.

 

According to a NASA fact sheet, a sonic boom is the thunder-like noise a person on the ground hears when an aircraft or other type of aerospace vehicle flies overhead faster than the speed of sound or supersonic. The air reacts like a fluid to supersonic objects. As objects travel, the air molecules are pushed aside with great force and this forms a shock wave much like a boat creates a bow wave. The bigger and heavier the aircraft, the more air it displaces.

 

In general, an aircraft generates two cones: one at the nose and one at the tail. According to the fact sheet, they are usually of similar strength and the time interval between the two as they reach the ground is primarily dependent on the size of the aircraft and its altitude.

 

Because most vehicles that create these booms are small, most people on the ground cannot distinguish between the two and they are usually heard as a single sonic boom. The Space Shuttle, on the other hand, was large enough that it created two very distinguishable and distinct booms that were easily heard by those on the ground.

 

Last week, SpaceFlight Insider reached out to SpaceX for an explanation as to why the returning Falcon 9 first stage produced three booms, instead of the typical two.

 

“[The] first boom is from the aft end (engines),” said John Taylor, SpaceX’s Communications Director, “[The] second boom is from the landing legs at the widest point going up the side of the rocket. [The] third boom is from the fins near the forward end.”

 

As the pace of SpaceX launches, and subsequent landings, are expected to pick up over the next several years, Space Coast residents will here a lot more of these periodic booms.

 

Additionally, SpaceX expects to begin the launch, and landing, of its Falcon Heavy rockets by the end of the year. The Falcon Heavy will consist of three Falcon 9 first stages, strapped together, and could result in all three stages landing back at CCAFS. The two side boosters will land almost simultaneously. Each will produce three sonic booms, for a total of as many as nine.

 

Falcon 9’s July 18, 2016, triple-sonic boom triggered several 911 calls from unsuspecting Space Coast residents.

 

“We announced this. We tell people that there’s going to be a sonic boom,” said Hans Koenigsmann, Vice President of Mission Assurance at SpaceX.

 

“In my eyes it’s very similar to the Shuttle. The Shuttle has a really characteristic sonic boom that people could recognize.”

Koenigsmann said, in comparison to Shuttle, he believes it’ll be the same thing and that it will take time to get used to it.

http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/space-exploration-technologies/double-triple-landing-falcon-9-creates-three-sonic-booms/

 

:woot:

  • Like 2
31 minutes ago, DocM said:

JCSAT-14 landed stage, a high & hard fastball GTO launch, doing a FULL DURATION test firing at McGregor!!

 

If that thing could fly.....

 

 

Guess you don't know how much (for example the motors) were refitted/repaired/etc.  Did they just give it a look over, fueled her up and lit it as was when it landed (aside from minor repairs which I'm assuming would be the norm).

  • Like 2

That....was stunning....even the "birds" in the background were cheering.

 

That test is even tougher being restrained to a reflective structure.....she was ready to fly.....:D

  • Like 1

Far as we can tell from hints the engines were cleaned, had some scortched wires & pipes replaced, new cork panels & boots and such. Also stuff that's been upgraded or covered with the newly upgraded thermal coatings.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 3
13 minutes ago, DocM said:

Far as we can tell the engines were cleaned, had some wires & pipes replaced, new boots and such. Also stuff that's been upgraded or covered with the upgraded thermal coatings.

Overall, that really was a show...letting her go "full duration".....as the test went on longer, it was "jaw drop" time and a "fist pump" when over...:woot:

  • Like 2

They certainly aren't shy about pushing that envelope, and hard.

 

We'll see how it looks after the test, but if one of the fastball GTO launches can be refurbed then fired full duration it sounds good for everything else. 

  • Like 2

Look close and you'll see two large new hangars. Also, that square test pad & trench on the far side right they "abandoned" a few months ago is now round and looks like there's been new work. Raptor stand in the far side of the big test stand & tripod.

 

 

  • Like 1

This is just....wow!

 

No one will have a database like this for some time. This will really instill confidence when SpaceX puts one of these stages in action...you know its good.

 

:D

  • Like 2

Nice activity ramp-up. Yeah .... and especially with all of the chatter re Orion/SLS lately, and the Review Board's scathing report recently. Looks like NASA is going double-down (now) on the Commercial programs ... finally.

  • Like 1

SpaceX may fire that stage up again tomorrow, if so, we know why....Elon stated 10 engine tests, but not duration tests...this may be a duration test for a "high end leader", to gain a realistic recovery performance rate or modification to "leader" requirements.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

slow news day......

 

SpaceX shows off testing facility to big McGregor crowd

 

Quote

About 1,500 Central Texans accepted an invitation from the Space Exploration Technologies Corp., better known as SpaceX, to its community appreciation picnic Saturday afternoon at the Central Texas Youth Rodeo Indoor Arena, a close neighbor to the SpaceX testing facility whose rocket engine tests frequently blanket the prairie with artificial thunder.


In a brief address, human resources vice president Brian Bjelde from the company’s headquarters in Hawthorne, California, told diners under a pavilion that SpaceX had conducted 5,000 tests at the McGregor facility since its establishment in 2003.


“Some say that’s more tests than a person would take showers in 13 years,” Bjelde said. “It’s a long way to come from three employees on 250 acres to our current 500 employees here now.”

more at the link...

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/business/spacex-shows-mcgregor-residents-around-testing-facility/article_b9e6d0fb-9519-5f86-8eab-a38fe6b3e4aa.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:D

  • Like 1
On 30/07/2016 at 10:13 PM, DocM said:

Total fires = 6.5 if you count,

 

McGregor qualification

LC-40 Static Fire

LC-40 Launch

LZ-1 landing (.5)

McGregor refire 1

McGregor refire 2

McGregor refire 3

Keep on testing that puppy until something breaks, then you have a some good data on what those engines can take. :)

8 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Keep on testing that puppy until something breaks, then you have a some good data on what those engines can take. :)

As a thought, why don't they do that? I know they'll have a pretty good idea, but wouldn't it be cheaper to see it fail during stress tests, rather than on a live cargo/crew flight? It's not like they haven't got 4 to play around with now!

1 minute ago, John. said:

As a thought, why don't they do that? I know they'll have a pretty good idea, but wouldn't it be cheaper to see it during stress tests, rather than on a live cargo/crew flight? It's not like they haven't got 4 to play around with now!

I think that's probably what they ARE doing...

They were planning 10 tests, but it'll have to come off the stand for a bit soon so they can test the AMOS-6 stage for early September. The JCSAT-16 stage for Aug 14 is already at KSC.

 

After them I believe Vandenberg is up with Iridium Next #1 (of 7 launches, 70 birds total) using SpaceX's all new multi-satellite dispenser. This dispenser will likely be used to launch the 4,000+ satellite SpaceX orbital internet backbone.

 

IridiumNext_Iridium.jpg

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!