Recommended Posts

My guess, non GTO launch to allow a re-examination of a landed reused core. Customer probably not SES and may very well be existing customer in the lineup to be launched in the next 6 months.

 

:)

From double to triple: Why the landing Falcon 9 creates three sonic booms

 

Quote

One of the iconic sounds of the Space Shuttle era has returned to the Space Coast—the sonic boom. The returning Shuttle orbiter produced a signature double sonic boom on its approach to Kennedy Space Center’s Shuttle Landing Facility. Similar sounds were heard again in the early morning hours of July 18 as SpaceX’s Falcon 9 first stage returned to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s (CCAFS) Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1), formerly Launch Complex 13, creating a triple sonic boom.

 

According to a NASA fact sheet, a sonic boom is the thunder-like noise a person on the ground hears when an aircraft or other type of aerospace vehicle flies overhead faster than the speed of sound or supersonic. The air reacts like a fluid to supersonic objects. As objects travel, the air molecules are pushed aside with great force and this forms a shock wave much like a boat creates a bow wave. The bigger and heavier the aircraft, the more air it displaces.

 

In general, an aircraft generates two cones: one at the nose and one at the tail. According to the fact sheet, they are usually of similar strength and the time interval between the two as they reach the ground is primarily dependent on the size of the aircraft and its altitude.

 

Because most vehicles that create these booms are small, most people on the ground cannot distinguish between the two and they are usually heard as a single sonic boom. The Space Shuttle, on the other hand, was large enough that it created two very distinguishable and distinct booms that were easily heard by those on the ground.

 

Last week, SpaceFlight Insider reached out to SpaceX for an explanation as to why the returning Falcon 9 first stage produced three booms, instead of the typical two.

 

“[The] first boom is from the aft end (engines),” said John Taylor, SpaceX’s Communications Director, “[The] second boom is from the landing legs at the widest point going up the side of the rocket. [The] third boom is from the fins near the forward end.”

 

As the pace of SpaceX launches, and subsequent landings, are expected to pick up over the next several years, Space Coast residents will here a lot more of these periodic booms.

 

Additionally, SpaceX expects to begin the launch, and landing, of its Falcon Heavy rockets by the end of the year. The Falcon Heavy will consist of three Falcon 9 first stages, strapped together, and could result in all three stages landing back at CCAFS. The two side boosters will land almost simultaneously. Each will produce three sonic booms, for a total of as many as nine.

 

Falcon 9’s July 18, 2016, triple-sonic boom triggered several 911 calls from unsuspecting Space Coast residents.

 

“We announced this. We tell people that there’s going to be a sonic boom,” said Hans Koenigsmann, Vice President of Mission Assurance at SpaceX.

 

“In my eyes it’s very similar to the Shuttle. The Shuttle has a really characteristic sonic boom that people could recognize.”

Koenigsmann said, in comparison to Shuttle, he believes it’ll be the same thing and that it will take time to get used to it.

http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/space-exploration-technologies/double-triple-landing-falcon-9-creates-three-sonic-booms/

 

:woot:

  • Like 2
31 minutes ago, DocM said:

JCSAT-14 landed stage, a high & hard fastball GTO launch, doing a FULL DURATION test firing at McGregor!!

 

If that thing could fly.....

 

 

Guess you don't know how much (for example the motors) were refitted/repaired/etc.  Did they just give it a look over, fueled her up and lit it as was when it landed (aside from minor repairs which I'm assuming would be the norm).

  • Like 2

That....was stunning....even the "birds" in the background were cheering.

 

That test is even tougher being restrained to a reflective structure.....she was ready to fly.....:D

  • Like 1

Far as we can tell from hints the engines were cleaned, had some scortched wires & pipes replaced, new cork panels & boots and such. Also stuff that's been upgraded or covered with the newly upgraded thermal coatings.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 3
13 minutes ago, DocM said:

Far as we can tell the engines were cleaned, had some wires & pipes replaced, new boots and such. Also stuff that's been upgraded or covered with the upgraded thermal coatings.

Overall, that really was a show...letting her go "full duration".....as the test went on longer, it was "jaw drop" time and a "fist pump" when over...:woot:

  • Like 2

They certainly aren't shy about pushing that envelope, and hard.

 

We'll see how it looks after the test, but if one of the fastball GTO launches can be refurbed then fired full duration it sounds good for everything else. 

  • Like 2

Look close and you'll see two large new hangars. Also, that square test pad & trench on the far side right they "abandoned" a few months ago is now round and looks like there's been new work. Raptor stand in the far side of the big test stand & tripod.

 

 

  • Like 1

This is just....wow!

 

No one will have a database like this for some time. This will really instill confidence when SpaceX puts one of these stages in action...you know its good.

 

:D

  • Like 2

Nice activity ramp-up. Yeah .... and especially with all of the chatter re Orion/SLS lately, and the Review Board's scathing report recently. Looks like NASA is going double-down (now) on the Commercial programs ... finally.

  • Like 1

SpaceX may fire that stage up again tomorrow, if so, we know why....Elon stated 10 engine tests, but not duration tests...this may be a duration test for a "high end leader", to gain a realistic recovery performance rate or modification to "leader" requirements.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

slow news day......

 

SpaceX shows off testing facility to big McGregor crowd

 

Quote

About 1,500 Central Texans accepted an invitation from the Space Exploration Technologies Corp., better known as SpaceX, to its community appreciation picnic Saturday afternoon at the Central Texas Youth Rodeo Indoor Arena, a close neighbor to the SpaceX testing facility whose rocket engine tests frequently blanket the prairie with artificial thunder.


In a brief address, human resources vice president Brian Bjelde from the company’s headquarters in Hawthorne, California, told diners under a pavilion that SpaceX had conducted 5,000 tests at the McGregor facility since its establishment in 2003.


“Some say that’s more tests than a person would take showers in 13 years,” Bjelde said. “It’s a long way to come from three employees on 250 acres to our current 500 employees here now.”

more at the link...

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/business/spacex-shows-mcgregor-residents-around-testing-facility/article_b9e6d0fb-9519-5f86-8eab-a38fe6b3e4aa.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:D

  • Like 1
On 30/07/2016 at 10:13 PM, DocM said:

Total fires = 6.5 if you count,

 

McGregor qualification

LC-40 Static Fire

LC-40 Launch

LZ-1 landing (.5)

McGregor refire 1

McGregor refire 2

McGregor refire 3

Keep on testing that puppy until something breaks, then you have a some good data on what those engines can take. :)

8 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Keep on testing that puppy until something breaks, then you have a some good data on what those engines can take. :)

As a thought, why don't they do that? I know they'll have a pretty good idea, but wouldn't it be cheaper to see it fail during stress tests, rather than on a live cargo/crew flight? It's not like they haven't got 4 to play around with now!

1 minute ago, John. said:

As a thought, why don't they do that? I know they'll have a pretty good idea, but wouldn't it be cheaper to see it during stress tests, rather than on a live cargo/crew flight? It's not like they haven't got 4 to play around with now!

I think that's probably what they ARE doing...

They were planning 10 tests, but it'll have to come off the stand for a bit soon so they can test the AMOS-6 stage for early September. The JCSAT-16 stage for Aug 14 is already at KSC.

 

After them I believe Vandenberg is up with Iridium Next #1 (of 7 launches, 70 birds total) using SpaceX's all new multi-satellite dispenser. This dispenser will likely be used to launch the 4,000+ satellite SpaceX orbital internet backbone.

 

IridiumNext_Iridium.jpg

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!