Networked visited by University of Michigan


Recommended Posts

Nuked the router. I'm setting up everything slowly. 

 

Did a reset to default settings. Within about 5 minutes from doing it "DNS_PROBE_FAILED" popped up in Google.

 

So far this is what I've done.

 

- Disabled IPv6

- Reset Router to Default settings

- Changed DNS Servers

 

Also, BudMan asked me in PM, if I could ping my gateway when it was happening, answer is no. It failed. I'm assuming the router is going up in flames.

 

Also, I figured this out because Netflix died, mobile devices suffered from it. So, it's looking like my router is dying.

when you say you can not ping your gateway do you mean your router???  192.168.1.1 or your ISP??  you need to try and ping both... if you can ping your router but not your isp it could be your isp just down..  If you can not ping your router then pretty much its toast..   Or you have something wrong with your machine.  Can you ping other stuff on your network - if so then your machine is fine..

 

its a tp-link right... You could put dd-wrt on it most likely.  That firmware is way better than the native ######...

5 hours ago, BudMan said:

when you say you can not ping your gateway do you mean your router???  192.168.1.1 or your ISP??  you need to try and ping both... if you can ping your router but not your isp it could be your isp just down..  If you can not ping your router then pretty much its toast..   Or you have something wrong with your machine.  Can you ping other stuff on your network - if so then your machine is fine..

 

its a tp-link right... You could put dd-wrt on it most likely.  That firmware is way better than the native ######...

Well.. I probably will, but I do need to change the gear anyways. I'm giving this router to my mom for her new apartment. 

 

I did what you suggested in your PM, Ping my DG and a website. This is the results;

 

C:\Users\BinaryData>ping 192.168.1.1

Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.100: Destination host unreachable.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 1, Lost = 3 (75% loss),

 

C:\Users\BinaryData>ping www.cnn.com
Ping request could not find host www.cnn.com. Please check the name and try again.

 

When I ping my ISPs DG for my IP, it fails 3x then 4th one it responds.

well here is the thing if you can not talk to your gateway, your not going to be able to find the IP for www.cnn.com so that test just shows that yeah you can not talk to your gateway.

 

When you can not talk to your router IP, can you ping other devices on your network?  which also could be just an issue with that router still if your all connected into its lan ports for your switching.

 

So, its really like a 10 min fix to just upgrade the router to dd-wrt and see if this makes this problem go away.  you can always still give it away once you get in the new setup.

1 hour ago, BudMan said:

well here is the thing if you can not talk to your gateway, your not going to be able to find the IP for www.cnn.com so that test just shows that yeah you can not talk to your gateway.

 

When you can not talk to your router IP, can you ping other devices on your network?  which also could be just an issue with that router still if your all connected into its lan ports for your switching.

 

So, its really like a 10 min fix to just upgrade the router to dd-wrt and see if this makes this problem go away.  you can always still give it away once you get in the new setup.

So, dd-wrt it is. What are the chances of screwing it up to the point of it no longer working? :p

Normal person pretty freaking low like 1 in a 1000... You prob more like 1 in 10 ;) heheheh j/k its pretty freaking straight forward... Most devices it just simple upload of the new firmware using the current firmwares upgrade web ui..  What is the exact model of this tp-link and will look up the dd-wrt instructions.

 

here you go

http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/TP-Link_TL-WDR4300#How_to_Flash

 

How to Flash

    Download factory-to-ddwrt.bin and tl-wdr4300-webflash.bin from the router database.
    Optional: Download tl-wdr4300v1-webrevert.rar in case you need to restore to stock firmware.
    Remove Ethernet cable from the WAN port on the router.
    Perform a 30/30/30 reset.
    Using Internet Explorer and a PC connected via Ethernet, flash factory_to_dd-wrt.bin using the web interface.
    Confirm the router has rebooted by visiting http://192.168.1.1
    Perform a 30/30/30 reset.
    Visit http://192.168.1.1 and flash the tl-wdr4300-webflash.bin file.
    After the router has finished rebooting, do another 30/30/30 reset.
    Plug the Ethernet cable into the WAN port, and visit http://192.168.1.1 to setup your preferences.

 

Any monkey could do that in like 5 minutes with ZERO change of FU...

 

Then here are links to the lastest and greatest versions

ftp://ftp.dd-wrt.com/betas/2016/02-15-2016-r29085/tplink_tl-wdr4300v1/

2 hours ago, Circaflex said:

Ahhh... That makes sense. Though I'm a bit nervous doing it now, haha.

 

Edit:

 

My router doesn't default to 192.168.1.1, it defaults to 192.168.0.1, I suppose that doesn't make a difference, correct?

Edited by BinaryData

Dude I have done this hundreds of times...  Only an issue once when I had too many beers ;)  And flashed the wrong version to the router... But was able to recover it..

 

But clearly its spelled out for you the correct files to grab... If it didn't work pretty sure there would be comments all over that wiki article, etc.

 

And you don't really have to do the 30/30/30 I rarely did that and didn't have any issues.. Doesn't matter what your router defaults too, once its on dd-wrt it will default to 192.168.1.1

 

edit: you flashing a tp-link reminds I should prob update the one I have sitting on my junk pile that I bring with me when might need a router, etc..

yeah the official stance is full reset, upgrade to dd-wrt, full reset... Any time you update to newer version of dd-wrt, full reset before and after..  I have never once done it so many times, sometimes never and have not had issues.

 

But it sure doesn't hurt to do it that way.  And that your sure its clean install with nothing hanging over in nvram, etc.

 

This really is a 5 min process, you should of done it long ago when it was first suggested in the beginning of this thread.  In all the times I have done this I have never seen a router be less stable after going to dd-wrt than the native..  i have a tp-link 3600.. And the native firmware was on it all of 5 minutes... Booted it, checked it out - could tell it was crap... Loaded dd-wrt before ever got put into actual use.

 

You have to really F it up to brick the things.. Even if you install the wrong version, you can quite often recover them...  When I did it when I was drunk, just used the paperclip trick to short 2 pins on a cheap and got the correct firmware loaded.. Common mistake made even when doing native firmware upgrades is users try and upgrade via wireless - that is ALWAYS bad idea!!!  Connect with a wire to the router and your fine.

Keep in mind Circaflex, we are talking about BD... If anyone can mess it up - he can ;)  But like I said even when I was 13 sheets to the wind and installed the WRONG firmware...  I was able to recover it, while even more booze in me..  So it really quite difficult to brick them...

 

So are you done yet? You stated you were going to do it 3 hours ago ;)

Wait what? If you are still on the stock firmware, do the hard reset to clear any crud that was setup during this mess. Plug ethernet cable into a laptop and into the router, login, flash the ddwrt firmware. Thats all. You can definitely connect to a router via hardwire without the router having a wan cable plugged in, that is how i did the archer c7. I dont see why you couldnt leave the wan cable connected, shouldnt be a problem, but I am sure @BudMancan chime in for that.

6 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Wait what? If you are still on the stock firmware, do the hard reset to clear any crud that was setup during this mess. Plug ethernet cable into a laptop and into the router, login, flash the ddwrt firmware. Thats all. You can definitely connect to a router via hardwire without the router having a wan cable plugged in, that is how i did the archer c7.

Except it doesnt. I've done it before but it won't let me. Now I can't get Internet back. Ffs....

 

I'm done screwing around with this. I did the hard reset like it said too. Apparently i bought a pos router. I'll stick with this junk until Friday and buy my firewall, switch, and wap then.  This is more than a 5 minute process, BudMan. I don't screw around with modding things or doing things like this. I've never installed ddwrt before, and clearly I'm about as useful as USB1 is fast.

You can't be afraid to break stuff.  That is all part of learning in this field.  If I were afraid to break stuff, I would never leave the house. 

 

broken snow shovel, check...shoes fell apart, check....lost a few lugnuts, check....borked a rds server gateway, check....

 

crap happens, sometimes it happens all at once.  When it does happen, regardless of how much it cost you, you work through it.    If you give up or don't want to play with it until it works, this is not the field for you. 

 

Patience and being able to work through the issue (no matter how major or small it is) is what is needed in this field. 

 

Do you think I give up when a server decides that it doesn't want to power on...and the entire multimillion dollar company is relying on this server to be up to be able to cash checks (banking check processing server, there was only one), did you think I said f it, it is broke?  No I worked through the issue, regardless of how stupid the "fix" was  (powering on and off the system for about 7 hours, and yes it did eventually power on with me just hitting the power button until 4 am).  I never gave up on that crap box. 

 

Rule one: take your time.  It takes as long as it does to get it right. 

Rule two: don't get frustrated.  Leave and come back if you are burnt out.  It may come to you in 30 seconds after you have had some sleep.

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not afraid to break things, not at all. But if this does break, I'm without internet for the next week, I don't have the cash to replace it right now, spent a little too much on my new TV, lol. I'd prefer to have a back up in case this didn't work.

 

What I did was..

 

1. Unplugged wan.

2. Performed 30/30/30

3. Attempted to go to 192.168.0.1 (didn't work)

4. Set my IP to 192.168.0.100 (defaults to 100 - 199)

5. Set my subnet to 255.255.255.0 (default)

6. Set my dg to 192.168.0.1

7. Set my dg to nothing

 

Still didn't work. Tried everything I knew, even went back to the manual to try and figure it out. Googled a bunch of different things, and nothing. None of my PCs could access it, I was getting a 169 Address..

 

Edit:

 

Do I absolutely HAVE to remove the WAN connection?

you can go to the store and pick up a router for 20 bux if needed.  I know I have a staples, walmart, target, etc that I can pickup a cheapy router if needed (besides I do have a few laying around, but if I didn't there are options)

 

192.168.1.1?

don't forget to set your pc to 192.168.1.100 or something in that range.

 

 

just an example of said cheap router

http://www.staples.com/Comtrend-WR-5881-Wireless-4-Port-Router-10-100-MbPS-WL-N-RTR/product_IM1QM6706

5 minutes ago, sc302 said:

you can go to the store and pick up a router for 20 bux if needed.  I know I have a staples, walmart, target, etc that I can pickup a cheapy router if needed (besides I do have a few laying around, but if I didn't there are options)

 

192.168.1.1?

don't forget to set your pc to 192.168.1.100 or something in that range.

 

 

just an example of said cheap router

http://www.staples.com/Comtrend-WR-5881-Wireless-4-Port-Router-10-100-MbPS-WL-N-RTR/product_IM1QM6706

My router defaults to 192.168.0.1. I don't know why but apparently TP-Link wants to be special, and annoy people.

 

I set my IP to 192.168.0.100, and nothing. The connection wasn't made. I had no "internet".

Something sounds way off. Hard reset the router using the paperclip method (poke the reset button), plug into router via ethernet. At this point, you arent getting internet so just unplug the WAN cable just in case it was causing a problem, and profit. You dont need to set any ips, mess with the subnet, none of that. Just connect via a physical cable to the router and flash away.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!