Quick poll on the UK's decision to leave the EU


Remain 48% Leave 52%  

253 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support the decision for the UK to leave the European Union?

    • Yes
      93
    • No
      134


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Audioboxer said:

Time to get some of that Scottish independence and negotiate to stay in the EU.

 

How can it possibly not go to a Yes this time? Nearly everyone i knew that was voting 'No' to the Scottish Indy Ref (myself included, sorry AB :( ) was in some part down to a desire to stay in Europe. With the EU floundered and the economy already on the rocks, there's little reason to be in the UK, for me at least.

  • Like 2
On ‎24‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 2:39 PM, MikeChipshop said:

Both Scotland and Northern Ireland wanting out of the UK now. London looking at "Special measures". JP Morgan out as well... hot damn this is messy.

Scotland and Ireland can't afford to leave the UK. Do you forget Alex Salmonds line, "We can do this, we are power rich", then 6 months later they were begging Westminster for a handout to help the oil company's.

What makes me laugh is that Scots get a lot more out of the economy than the English do, yet you think your hard done by.

 

As for brexit, what the scots don't realise is that a lot of people down south will never be able to afford there own home or even rent one. House prices have gone up so much over the last several years, unless your bringing in £50,000+ a year, your not getting a mortgage. You have no idea what it's like when people who are earning an average wage or less will never be able to get a place of there own. That is a direct result of immigration, demand for housing has greatly out stripped supply. Add to this wage compression due to cheap labour, and for a lot of people the future was a bit bleak to say the least.

 

13 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

 

How can it possibly not go to a Yes this time? Nearly everyone i knew that was voting 'No' to the Scottish Indy Ref (myself included, sorry AB :( ) was in some part down to a desire to stay in Europe. With the EU floundered and the economy already on the rocks, there's little reason to be in the UK, for me at least.

Scotland have already been told they can't join the EU on there own.

1 minute ago, SIE said:

As for brexit, what the scots don't realise is that a lot of people down south will never be able to afford there own home or even rent one. House prices have gone up so much over the last several years, unless your bringing in £50,000+ a year, your not getting a mortgage. You have no idea what it's like when people who are earning an average wage or less will never be able to get a place of there own. That is a direct result of immigration, demand for housing has greatly out stripped supply. Add to this wage compression due to cheap labour, and for a lot of people the future was a bit bleak to say the least.

 

Every Scot, every person even, knows full well that the house prices in the South East are ridiculous, it's common knowledge throughout the UK.

47 minutes ago, illegaloperation said:

Scotland and Northern Ireland will probably now vote to leave the UK and try to join the EU.

 

I hope Cameron is happy that he will go down in history as the one to break up the UK.

tbh mate im no fan of cameron, but i point the finger of blame to Boris & Nigel more than Cameron.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, MikeChipshop said:

So we've got a difference of opinions. What's that got to do with Scotland?

You were going on about Scotland having another referendum which would be a yes this time, have a read back through the thread please.

1 minute ago, Mando said:

tbh mate im no fan of cameron, but i point the finger of blame to Boris & Nigel more than Cameron.

They were all in it together. Maybe this is one for the conspiracy forum, but the Tories benefit hugely from all this. If Scotland leave, and maybe even Ireland that leaves just an England with a majority Tory rule effectively eliminating the SNP from Westminster entirely. That leaves the Tories with barely any competition, Labour is a mess of in fighting, UKIP is just a joke party, and they managed to kill of Lib Dems years ago now.

16 minutes ago, SIE said:

You have no idea what it's like when people who are earning an average wage or less will never be able to get a place of there own. That is a direct result of immigration, demand for housing has greatly out stripped supply.

Letting the Chinese and everyone else buy property as a way of investment which they then leave empty has got nothing to do with the EU or immigration.

  • Like 3
1 minute ago, SIE said:

You were going on about Scotland having another referendum which would be a yes this time, have a read back through the thread please.

And then you started bawling about house prices in the south east, scots this, scots this. Pull it together man you're waffling. Stop blaming the Scots. 

2 minutes ago, FunkyMike said:

Letting the Chinese and everyone else buy property as a way of investment which they then leave empty has got nothing to do with the EU or immigration.

Don;t forget the hordes and hordes of Russian properties, oh... and let's not forget the tons of over priced buy to lets standing empty because the every day folk are priced out by both the landords and the letting agents.

15 minutes ago, SIE said:

And yet you think we should just suck it up. I have two children, how do you think it makes me feel knowing if things carried on the way they were, the only way they would get a house of there own is when I die.

Dont you think we have the same issue up here?  Its taken me until I am 44 to afford buying my own house, ive worked in good paying jobs since 1989 and only now has it been possible to afford it.

 

Do you honestly think that this issue is purely the EUs fault??

Seriously mate? House prices suddenly just going to be for 4 sheep and a pack of hubba bubba now we have instigated leaving the EU??

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4

The thing is, the one that wanted out always see things one sided, like the money we put into the EU pot, to them it's like we don't get any money back which is funny considering Wales alone gets about £2.4 billion out of the EU, they always see things one directional, EU bad, Britain good, no shades of gray.

 

But really something this big should of been a mandatory vote, the ones to blame with this is the mass media, politicians and voters, the mass media for not giving the people the facts so they can vote fully informed and not out of fear, politicians, well pretty much the same reasons as mass media and the voters, I would love to know what the percentage of voters actually knew what they was voting for and unfortunately, I bet most don't really know, I already know because I've talked to many people over my lifetime that have little to no idea what the EU is but think it's bad and you know what the real funny thing is, you can almost tell which newspaper they read by what views they tell, kind of suggesting that it's not so much their views but what they've been brainwashed into thinking, and it doesn't surprise me really, the mass media have been having a go at the EU for like 40 years now so it's no wonder people think like they do, say something enough time and people end up thinking it's true even if it's not.

 

In any case, it's sad for the UK and you've got to feel sorry for the younger generation of people, they are the ones that will feel this the most.

5 minutes ago, FunkyMike said:

Letting the Chinese and everyone else buy property as a way of investment which they then leave empty has got nothing to do with the EU or immigration.

 

1 minute ago, MikeChipshop said:

Don;t forget the hordes and hordes of Russian properties, oh... and let's not forget the tons of over priced buy to lets standing empty because the every day folk are priced out by both the landords and the letting agents.

That's funny, I don't see hordes of Russians or many Chinese buying up property in the West Midlands, you seem to be under the impression that London is England.

 

6 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

And then you started bawling about house prices in the south east, scots this, scots this. Pull it together man you're waffling. Stop blaming the Scots. 

I suggest you have a read back through the thread as you can't seem to remember what you have written.

Just now, SIE said:

 

That's funny, I don't see hordes of Russians or many Chinese buying up property in the West Midlands, you seem to be under the impression that London is England.

 

I suggest you have a read back through the thread as you can't seem to remember what you have written.

Birmingham City centre had newly build apartment blocks standing empty for years under the orders of agents and landlords.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Mando said:

Dont you think we have the same issue up here?  Its taken me until I am 44 to afford buying my own house, ive worked in good paying jobs since 1989 and only now has it been possible to afford it.

 

Do you honestly think that this issue is purely the EUs fault??

Seriously mate? House prices suddenly just going to be for 4 sheep and a pack of hubba bubba now we have instigated leaving the EU??

 

 

 

 

Are you seriously trying to say, population increase, at least partly caused by immigration, hasn't increased the demand for housing?

It's basic math.

3 minutes ago, SIE said:

Are you seriously trying to say, population increase, at least partly caused by immigration, hasn't increased the demand for housing?

It's basic math.

not at all buddy, the biggest influence has been the lack of investment by the UK government in affordable housing and the increase in buy to let in the last 30 years., and the sell off by the conservatives in the late 70s & 80s selling off council properties.

 

you want to blame someone, I understand and agree, blaming the EU is not the root cause. Look inward to our own government.

 

in regards to the immigration angle, you do realise that the bigger source of immigration is outside of the EU as it always has been?

What we are seeing now cannot be labelled as immigration, they are asylum seekers fleeing war in their home country, under the Geneva convention we have a duty of care to them, just as every other country who abide by said international law.

1 minute ago, SIE said:

 

That's funny, I don't see hordes of Russians or many Chinese buying up property in the West Midlands, you seem to be under the impression that London is England.

 

I suggest you have a read back through the thread as you can't seem to remember what you have written.

Well it was you who said "Down South". I'm sorry but at what point in history has the Midlands ever been known (in the context of England) as "Down South"? If you look at "Down south" in it's proper context, i.e. Watford Gap and south, yes there's a ###### ton of properties as described by myself and FunkyMike. House prices in Scotland aren't a barrel of joy either.

 

As for reading back through my posts, why don't you enlighten me as you're so clued up on what i said when i quite specifically remember talking about the possible Scottish referendum before you can him all upset over some nonsense.

5 minutes ago, SIE said:

Are you seriously trying to say, population increase, at least partly caused by immigration, hasn't increased the demand for housing?

It's basic math.

Basic math it is not.  And clearly you have no idea about supply and demand in housing market, since you cannot analyze it beyond basic math. economics are SLIGHTLY more then basic math, even if simple.

https://fullfact.org/economy/are-immigrants-pushing-house-prices/

 

  • Like 2
Just now, Mando said:

not at all buddy, the biggest influence has been the lack of investment by the UK government in affordable housing and the increase in buy to let in the last 30 years. you want to blame someone, I understand and agree, blaming the EU is not the root cause. Look inward to our own government.

I do blame them as well mate, but as for investment, the UK needed to build I think it was 250,000? (<not 100% on that figure) homes a year just to keep up with immigration.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
    • Does anyone remember the time when VSCode was a lightweight solution, just shy of 40 MB? No?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!