Hillary Clinton is losing her mind and the election...(thank God)...2016


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I did not bring Kerry into this thread he was brought into before I post try to keep up

This is the first post in this thread regarding Kerry.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, DocM said:

CNN also said the above which is not true.

I also said it was not true. I used it to show how CNN plays with the facts so I guess I did bring CNN up.

12 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Talk about dragging things off point ... your Kerry post did that.

 

As posted I brought up CNN

4 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

Why don't you?   You start this crap and when it doesn't go the way you want, you get bent out of shape. And you, of all people, telling others to stay on topic, good grief.   These threads rarely stay on topic and eventually descend into to a worthless back and forth that will not change anyone's mind or position.

 

Neither candidate IMO demonstrate the kind of characteristics I find desirable in a president.   They lie (certainly the norm for many politicians), but their lies are beyond what we've come to expect.  Both have demonstrated an elitism that puts them above the norm when it comes to the rule of law, their influence and wealth affords them the best in protection (not entirely bad, unless it keeps them safe in the face of real wrong doing).  Neither candidate represents the most Americans, only a portion of the public at any given moment.  Eventually people will vote and then we'll know.  And each person will decide based on their own beliefs and desires.

 

I think I'll vote for Joe the Plumber, where is he at these days?   :|

3 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

This is the first post in this thread regarding Kerry.

 

 

 

No that was in the LINK.

Just now, Raze said:

Why don't you?   You start this crap and when it doesn't go the way you want, you get bent out of shape. And you, of all people, telling others to stay on topic, good grief.   These threads rarely stay on topic and eventually descend into to a worthless back and forth that will not change anyone's mind or position.

 

Neither candidate IMO demonstrate the kind of characteristics I find desirable in a president.   They lie (certainly the norm for many politicians), but their lies are beyond what we've come to expect.  Both have demonstrated an elitism that puts them above the norm when it comes to the rule of law, their influence and wealth affords them the best in protection (not entirely bad, unless it keeps them safe in the face of real wrong doing).  Neither candidate represents the most Americans, only a portion of the public at any given moment.  Eventually people will vote and then we'll know.  And each person will decide based on their own beliefs and desires.

 

I think I'll vote for Joe the Plumber, where is he at these days?   :|

He is out looking for Barney . I brought up the link to show that CNN was wrong what Jjk posted was in that link.

5 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I also said it was not true. I used it to show how CNN plays with the facts so I guess I did bring CNN up.

As posted I brought up CNN

So, we've come full circle.  What does CNN reporting what John Kerry have to do with this thread?  CNN didn't play facts ... that just reported what John Kerry said.  If John Kerry is not correct ... the problem is with his words ... not CNN reporting it.

 

2 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

No that was in the LINK.

You said you didn't bring Kerry into this thread .... the first post regarding Kerry was by you even though you said you didn't bring him up.

  • Like 2

Secretary of State John Kerry said a recent spate of terror attacks in Western countries means ISIS is “on the run.” Watch CNNgo

 

This was the link and you have to read what I posted under it. Trump was brought into this way before I just wanted to show that CNN was wrong about the Polling Data and wrong about Kerry.

 

@jjkusaf read

2 hours ago, Dot Matrix said:

Trump's campaign has been nothing but attacks on minorities, other politicians, and other people who don't fall in line behind him. The man doesn't take "no for an answer. Those who do not submit to his will become targets for personal attacks. He cannot even mention Clinton's name without putting 'crooked' in front. The man is hateful, spiteful, xenophobic, misogynistic, megalomanical, etc. You cannot deny his hated. A trump presidency will be bad for everyone in many different ways.

Name ONE attack by Trump on a minority - or are you one of those that consider "illegal immigrants" a "protected minority group"? Last I heard, legally speaking, "illegal immigrants" = "criminals";  if you are referring to Donald Trump asking for a pause in the asylum program until the vetting is fixed, what would you call identical requests from the sitting Secretary of Homeland Security and the same director of the FBI that let Hillary off the hook without facing charges in the e-mail mess?  I have a greater respect for Martha Stewart and G. Gordon Liddy (convicted of the crime and did the time - in both cases) than illegal immigrants.

  • Like 2
50 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

Name ONE attack by Trump on a minority - or are you one of those that consider "illegal immigrants" a "protected minority group"? Last I heard, legally speaking, "illegal immigrants" = "criminals";  if you are referring to Donald Trump asking for a pause in the asylum program until the vetting is fixed, what would you call identical requests from the sitting Secretary of Homeland Security and the same director of the FBI that let Hillary off the hook without facing charges in the e-mail mess?  I have a greater respect for Martha Stewart and G. Gordon Liddy (convicted of the crime and did the time - in both cases) than illegal immigrants.

Are you freakin kidding me?! Kid, have you been living under a rock this past year?!

 

Fine. You want a compilation of Donald's "greatest hits", then here you go:

 

1) Mexicans are rapists and criminals

2) Women are emotional "pigs", "slobs", and "dogs" who "bleed from their wherever"

3) Donald Trump doesn't like servicemen who were captured

4) All out ban on Muslims

5) Donald Trump wants Muslim databases, and identification

 

 

  • Like 2
5 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

Are you freakin kidding me?! Kid, have you been living under a rock this past year?!

 

Fine. You want a compilation of Donald's "greatest hits", then here you go:

 

1) Mexicans are rapists and criminals

2) Women are emotional "pigs", "slobs", and "dogs" who "bleed from their wherever"

3) Donald Trump doesn't like servicemen who were captured

4) All out ban on Muslims

5) Donald Trump wants Muslim databases, and identification

 

 

1. Many are but not all

2. Totally absurd

3 .He said that in sort of a jest but it was not good.

4. I believe he said a temp. Ban

5. Nothing wrong with that, The NSA is capturing all of our data now.

5 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

1. Many are but not all

2. Totally absurd

3 .He said that in sort of a jest but it was not good.

4. I believe he said a temp. Ban

5. Nothing wrong with that, The NSA is capturing all of our data now.

So you feel there is nothing wrong with creating a database for Muslims, but you go ape ###### over people suggesting there should be a national gun registry? 

  • Like 1
Just now, Stoffel said:

So you feel there is nothing wrong with creating a database for Muslims, but you go ape ###### over people suggesting there should be a national gun registry? 

The Gun Debate is over there-------------------->>>>> As for the Muslim thing, it is already being done my friend.

1 minute ago, Gary7 said:

The Gun Debate is over there-------------------->>>>> As for the Muslim thing, it is already being done my friend.

WOW a typical Gary7 answer, just deflecting the point and reply with nonsense

  • Like 2
19 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

Are you freakin kidding me?! Kid, have you been living under a rock this past year?!

 

Fine. You want a compilation of Donald's "greatest hits", then here you go:

 

1) Mexicans are rapists and criminals

2) Women are emotional "pigs", "slobs", and "dogs" who "bleed from their wherever"

3) Donald Trump doesn't like servicemen who were captured

4) All out ban on Muslims

5) Donald Trump wants Muslim databases, and identification

These have been discussed into the ground, and are all dead horses. Many of them are intentionally taken out of context, so can people please stop peddling this crap?

55 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

1. Many are but not all

2. Totally absurd

3 .He said that in sort of a jest but it was not good.

4. I believe he said a temp. Ban

5. Nothing wrong with that, The NSA is capturing all of our data now.

1.  There are many people called Gary that are too, but not all.

2.  Agreed, Trump was absolutely absurd in his remarks.

3.  In jest?   What's so funny about being a POW?

4.  His initial reaction were a bit confusing and his follow-up statements didn't help.  His later backtracking remarks did clear up somethings.

5.  Database was overblown, but it did in fact seem to garner support for Trump.   The NSA?  Deflection much.  If the NSA is doing that, it's alright with you?

Edited by Raze
  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It is my real name. I am not self centered. I just do not appreciate my name being used in something that is not even related to the topic. I never use any other members name is such a manner.

Great response!  Now, how would you feel if your ethnicity was being called rapist or murderers?  Would you appreciate that?

 

17 minutes ago, Raze said:

3.  In jest?   What's so funny about being a POW?

Didn't you get the memo?  That is the new punchline for jokes these days!   :)  /s

  • Like 2
26 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Great response!  Now, how would you feel if your ethnicity was being called rapist or murderers?  Would you appreciate that?

 

It was not

 

26 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Didn't you get the memo?  That is the new punchline for jokes these days

No, but it appears you did not read my entire response.

 

1. Many are but not all

2. Totally absurd

3 .He said that in sort of a jest but it was not good.

4. I believe he said a temp. Ban

5. Nothing wrong with that, The NSA is capturing all of our data now.

12 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It was not

It was not what?  You didn't even read the question.

 

 

12 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

No, but it appears you did not read my entire response.

I wasn't responding to you ... I was responding to Raze.

Capture.JPG

1 hour ago, Dot Matrix said:

Are you freakin kidding me?! Kid, have you been living under a rock this past year?!

 

Fine. You want a compilation of Donald's "greatest hits", then here you go:

 

1) Mexicans are rapists and criminals

2) Women are emotional "pigs", "slobs", and "dogs" who "bleed from their wherever"

3) Donald Trump doesn't like servicemen who were captured

4) All out ban on Muslims

5) Donald Trump wants Muslim databases, and identification

 

 

1.  He was referring to those attacking those same illegal immigrants enroute to the US while transiting Mexico - in short, that problem is in Mexico itself.  Where did he get it?  From reportage originating from (of all places) UNIVISION and MSNBC.  Are UNIVISION, MSNBC, and Telemundo lying about that?  Is the Mexican government lying about that?  Never mind that such transiting is *itself* a violation of Mexican law - why is the Mexican government, at the very least, looking the other way while such transiting is going on, and allowing the near-lawless conduct in their northern states?

2.  The Trump Organization has more women in positions of authority than most other corporations of similar size - including ALL of those critical of Trump.

3.  Cooperating with your captors is against the Code of Conduct - and a violation of the UCMJ.  He was, in fact, referring specifically to Bowe Bergdahl.

4.  A temporary pause in the asylum program was ALSO requested by the same folks I referred to (the sitting Secretary of DHS and the FBI Director) for a very sane reason - we can't vet folks from that area due to lack of data.  It may not politically palatable, but it's the honest truth.  (That's the problem, though, isn't it?  You're in an untenable position in terms of border security AND national security - and you are basically hoping that the issue solves itself.)  Did or did not ISIS - publicly - tell us that they would take advantage of that lack of data?

5.  The data problem with immigration is not unique to Muslim immigrants - so says the FBI and DHS themselves.  As we are seeing in the EU, open borders isn't working - and the United States has the same issue with immigrants from the ME AO that the EU does.  Until we get better vetting why allow ANYONE in from that AO?  Even more telling, the President is prioritizing Muslims - why?  What about non-Muslims - from the same AO?  (The same question can be asked of the EU, for that matter.)

8 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

It was not what?  You didn't even read the question.

 

 

I wasn't responding to you ... I was responding to Raze.

Capture.JPG

I did list the questions if you cannot go back two posts and look you have a real problem. Questions were asked and answered.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1303156-hillary-clinton-is-losing-her-mind-and-the-electionthank-god2016/?do=findComment&comment=597500112

 

This will be my final reply to you.

31 minutes ago, Stoffel said:

Sadly enough i don't think he is a troll, just somebody not very good at following conversation and always ready to reply to a buzz word he heard

The kid is all over the place in every thread he replies to.

  • Like 2
21 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

3.  Cooperating with your captors is against the Code of Conduct - and a violation of the UCMJ.  He was, in fact, referring specifically to Bowe Bergdahl.

What - the - heck are you talking about?  Code of Conduct, UCMJ, Bowe Bergdahl?  What does that have to do with his disparaging remarks about McCain?

 

Also, I suggest you look up the UCMJ ... because nowhere does it say you can not "cooperate" with your captors...as long as it doesn't bring harm to the US, fellow prisoners, preferential treatment, goes against regulations ... etc.  That is besides the point though and off topic.

 

Quote

Regarding John McCain....

“He’s not a war hero,” said Trump. “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.”

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I did list the questions if you cannot go back two posts and look you have a real problem. Questions were asked and answered.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1303156-hillary-clinton-is-losing-her-mind-and-the-electionthank-god2016/?do=findComment&comment=597500112

 

This will be my final reply to you.

I never responded or questioned your list of questions and answers.  My only response to you was the following question ....

 

1 hour ago, jjkusaf said:

Great response!  Now, how would you feel if your ethnicity was being called rapist or murderers?  Would you appreciate that?

Regarding "this will be my final reply to you" ... thank goodness.

With any luck he'll request that they close the thread.  A well known modus operandi.

Edited by Raze
  • Like 4
17 minutes ago, Raze said:

With any luck he'll request that they close the thread.  A well known modus operandi.

Yup. Typical chain of events. 

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 7-Zip 26.02 by Razvan Serea 7-Zip is a open source file archiver with a high compression ratio. The program supports 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP, WIM, ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DEB, DMG, FAT, HFS, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, VHD, WIM, XAR, Z. Most of the source code is under the GNU LGPL license. The unRAR code is under a mixed license: GNU LGPL + unRAR restrictions. Check license information here: 7-Zip license. You can use 7-Zip on any computer, including a computer in a commercial organization. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip. The main features of 7-Zip are: High compression ratio in 7z format with LZMA compression Compression ratio for ZIP and GZIP formats: 2-10 % better than the ratio provided by PKZip and WinZip Strong AES-256 encryption in 7z and ZIP formats Self-extracting capability for 7z format Integration with Windows Shell Powerful File Manager Powerful command line version Plugin for FAR Manager Localizations for 74 languages 7-Zip 26.02 changelog: Some bugs and vulnerabilities were fixed. Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (64-bit) | 1.6 MB (Open Source) Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (32-bit) | 1.3 MB Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (ARM64) | 1.5 MB View: 7-Zip Website | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!