Recommended Posts

Newt makes perfect sense and I was actually stumped as to why Trump didn't choose to run with him. A ticket like that would have bolstered his chances.

 

And what's wrong with a moon base? I still think it's the smartest thing to do before heading to Mars.

2 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

This is the kind of projection both sides make against the other. Both sides drudge up pointless nonsense when there's perfectly valid things to talk about instead. But leave it to some people to think only "conservatives" are the guilty party.

Projection is taking a weakness of yours and portraying your opponent as having that same weakness - by its nature it doesn't work both ways. Trump is erratic and irrational, hence why conservatives are desperate to paint Clinton in the same light. As I said, Clinton has so many personality flaws as to make her a terrible candidate but in comparison to Trump she's positively spectacular, which only highlights how appalling US politics has become.

 

This video is clearly not an accurate and objective critique of Clinton - it's a vicious hit piece from cobbled together clips only a few seconds long each.

  • Like 4
6 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

Projection is taking a weakness of yours and portraying your opponent as having that same weakness - by its nature it doesn't work both ways. Trump is erratic and irrational, hence why conservatives are desperate to paint Clinton in the same light. As I said, Clinton has so many personality flaws as to make her a terrible candidate but in comparison to Trump she's positively spectacular, which only highlights how appalling US politics has become.

 

This video is clearly not an accurate and objective critique of Clinton - it's a vicious hit piece from cobbled together clips only a few seconds long each.

By its nature both sides can and have done it. Democrats have already tried to paint Trump as incapable of keeping top secret information secret (a failing of Clinton).

1 hour ago, Torolol said:

speaking of clips, theres more:

 

I really don't understand how you can take this seriously. it's a combination of heavily cherry picked and blatantly heavily edited (repeated looping etc...) clips. You can make anyone look like that with these kind of techniques.

 

You either know this is ###### or you're so gullible that you lap up every right wing conspiracy theory that comes your way

 

 

Just now, ViperAFK said:

I really don't understand how you can take this seriously. it's a combination of heavily cherry picked and blatantly heavily edited (repeated looping etc...) clips. You can make anyone look like that with these kind of techniques.

 

You either know this is ###### or you're so gullible that you lap up every right wing conspiracy theory that comes your way

 

 

Well I posted a link that at least debunked what that TV Doctor said but the member refused to watch it.

I see the GOP is desperate to paint Hillary as physically unfit for office since Trump is mentally unstable for it.

 

As for Newt's moon base, who's going to pay for it?  Gonna need a big tax hike to fund that.  And we all know how conservatives feel about tax hikes.

15 minutes ago, DocM said:

Dr. Bob Lahita is Professor of Medicine at Rutgers Univesity, New Jersey. 

 

 

So ? I have some creationist geologists that would love to talk to you.


Why should we care about what someone who has never diagnosed her has to say ?

This is yet another in a long line of conspiracy's that the "InfoWars Party" AKA the GOP has engaged in.

 

"What you gotta do is go online…all you gotta do is go online.”

 

MTM2NjQ0NzkzMzYxMjQ1Nzkx.jpg


Every day the line between this show and republican talking points gets thinner, Hell this jackass is sponsoring your sodding events for ****ing ****s sake!

Edited by TPreston
  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, TechJunkie81 said:

I see the GOP is desperate to paint Hillary as physically unfit for office since Trump is mentally unstable for it.

 

As for Newt's moon base, who's going to pay for it?  Gonna need a big tax hike to fund that.  And we all know how conservatives feel about tax hikes.

There's plenty of existing FWA in the existing national budget - try looking there.  (I'm talking about according to both the CBO and GAO; start there.)

 

11 minutes ago, DocM said:

Dr. Bob Lahita is Professor of Medicine at Rutgers Univesity, New Jersey. 

 

 

Without having examined her himself his opinion is speculation, pure and simple. And Fox News has an obvious agenda to push, which is to spread uncertainty and doubt about her health. How many Fox News segments do you see questioning Trump's mental faculties?

 

Don't forget the absurdity we have earlier in the campaign with Trump's doctor claiming his health was ‘astonishingly excellent', that he had 'no history of ever using alcohol' and if elected he 'will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency'. Should we really trust Trump's health when he gets his doctor to provide a patently false assessment of his health?

19 minutes ago, TechJunkie81 said:

I see the GOP is desperate to paint Hillary as physically unfit for office since Trump is mentally unstable for it.

 

As for Newt's moon base, who's going to pay for it?  Gonna need a big tax hike to fund that.  And we all know how conservatives feel about tax hikes.

The standard left wing shoot the messenger. That doctor is NOT a TV Doctor. She is unfit to be President on Health issues, Security Issues and Trustworthiness.

Just now, Gary7 said:

The standard left wing shoot the messenger. That doctor is NOT a TV Doctor. She is unfit to be President on Health issues

So if we find a doctor to testify to the media that trump is mentally ill does that mean he is unfit to run ?

No you would see the stupidity there wouldn't you.

  • Like 2
3 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

How many Fox News segments do you see questioning Trump's mental faculties?

No news agency is questioning Trump's health because he released his health information already, as you stated. So I see no reason why he cannot request the same of Hillary. But she doesn't have to, just as Trump doesn't have to release his tax records like Clinton has (despite them trying to force him to). Same tactics, different agendas and goals. How about we just stop the BS about trying to force private information into the public by painting it as some kind of scandal or secret?

  • Like 2
6 minutes ago, TPreston said:

So if we find a doctor to testify to the media that trump is mentally ill does that mean he is unfit to run ?

No you would see the stupidity there wouldn't you.

This is NOT about Trump. He has had a recent physical and is fine, he can walk up stairs all by himself. More spin/

6 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

This is NOT about Trump. He has had a recent physical and is fine, he can walk up stairs all by himself. More spin/

Of course not! because you'd see how asinine this argument is then but I guess anyone that has ever slipped on the stairs is now unfit to run for office :rofl: 

 

Oh I tell you every day the line between infowars and conservative talking points gets smaller and smaller.

When was the last time you ass planted on the stairs ? I'm guessing it was within this year I sure I know it was for me.. Wooden one too hurt like a sob.

  • Like 2

Trumps medical letter is current but Clinton's is over a year old, time for a detailed update, and her medical conditions are serious enough they could easily present 25th amendment concerns.

 

You know damned well if Trump had suffered 3 heart attacks, transient ischaemic attacks, seizures or whatever it'd be an issue. 

  • Like 2
2 minutes ago, DocM said:

Trumps medical letter is current but Clinton's is over a year old, time for a detailed update, and her medical conditions are serious enough they could easily present 25th amendment concerns.

 

You know damned well if Trump had suffered 3 heart attacks, transient ischaemic attacks, seizures or whatever it'd be an issue. 

Release I mean validate the birth certificate :rolleyes: 

46 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

The standard left wing shoot the messenger. That doctor is NOT a TV Doctor. She is unfit to be President on Health issues, Security Issues and Trustworthiness.

And Trump is unfit to be President based on his tax evasion, lack of mental capacity, illegal fund raising and his brazen lies to the American public. Both are terrible candidates. To claim that trustworthiness is a qualifying criteria for President would mean that Trump would be automatically disqualified.

 

29 minutes ago, DocM said:

Trumps medical letter is current but Clinton's is over a year old, time for a detailed update, and her medical conditions are serious enough they could easily present 25th amendment concerns.

Trump's doctor put out a patently false assessment of his health. Which is worse: an assessment that is over a year old, or an assessment that is demonstrably false? I mean, Trump's doctor claimed he has never drunk alcohol - not only is that demonstrably false—there are pictures of him drinking champagne on the internet—but it is not something that a medical assessment could determine.

 

At the end of the day the health and trustworthiness of a candidate is best determined at the election booth. If people are concerned about Clinton's health then they won't vote for her. But it's worth pointing out that some of the best leaders have had questionable health and serious character flaws.

  • Like 3
14 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

She has not had a press conference in months.. What is she hiding??

The world on the street is she may have a yeast infection...can you imagine, how embarrassing.

 

:shifty:

 

 

/s

42 minutes ago, DocM said:

Trumps medical letter is current but Clinton's is over a year old, time for a detailed update, and her medical conditions are serious enough they could easily present 25th amendment concerns.

 

You know damned well if Trump had suffered 3 heart attacks, transient ischaemic attacks, seizures or whatever it'd be an issue. 

Wait ... when did Hillary have 3 heart attacks?

 

Some people are just reaching now.  Dislike and don't vote for Hillary for her agenda ... but dang ... no need to start spouting off non-truths. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!