What was the last movie you watched? (2017 Edition)


Recommended Posts

If you have recently watched a movie, tell us a bit about what you thought and give us your rating out of 5 or 10. :)

Please use spoiler tags for recently released movies (5 years since the release date is a good cut-off) or just avoid spoilers all together!

 

Usual Neowin Rules Apply.

maxresdefault.jpg

 

Horrible acting by the leads the first 30 minutes... really felt that they weren't into the part.  It got better as  the movie advanced. Around 7ish/10 story wise i'd say.

Edited by Draconian Guppy
  • Like 2

Bad Moms - 8/10 
It was actually funnier that I would have thought..

Legally Blonde 2 (2003)
This movie doesn't really give credit to Elle Woods. The first movie really showed someone who had confidence and wasn't going to let other people's options of her bring her down. She demonstrated strong morals such as not being judgemental and letting others show their true colors rather than calling them out. The second installment of this series just didn't have the depth the first movie did.  Elle taught us to be ourselves and be the best person we are capable of. 

Arrival - 9/10

 

Dennis Villeneuve is a master of suspense, and combined with natural curiosity most of us have when it comes the theme, it created a really engaging experience. At times it felt that nobody in the theater was breathing. The story is really good, the performances as well. I can't wait to watch it again at home, to see if it holds up.

 

Rogue One - 6/10

 

Characters were really flat and it hindered my interest in the movie, especially because the movie sort of hangs on them being interesting in order to work, as you already know where it's leading. The action at the end is cool, and it does a few things you wouldn't expect from a Star Wars movie, but that's about it.

 

Hunt for the Wilderpeople - 7/10

 

A nice feel-good adventure/friendship movie from one of the guys who directed "What We Do in the Shadows." It's a tad predictable, and a bit zany (reminded me of Wes Anderson in that regard), but Sam Neil and the kid actor are great. The scenery is beautiful, and the cinematography manages to capture it.

Death Race 2050

I happen to be a fan since the Original David Carradine movie

 

death-race-2050-poster.jpg

 

Easily one of the worst movies in the entire existence of bad movies

terrible acting, terrible directing, terrible cgi,

absolutely terrible

 

10/10 and I loved every second of it

Last movie I watched was suicide squad last night (again) must get the directors cut watched and see if its more well rounded than theatre release.

 

Decent enough but it was all saved by.....it even redeems the Jokers shortcomings in this movie.

Spoiler

Gallery_327632K4a_SS_Dom_Character_Harley_57a3c96be06cb4.90062679.jpg

 

stunning :D

 

8/10.

 

 

  • Like 1

Kingsglaive: Final Fantasy XV. Watched this Saturday night with my wife. The CGI was literally so good it hurt my eyes, and yes I do mean literally. The graphics were so good, the people and a lot of the 'normal things' looked real. The hair was a little exaggerated as were things like the cars and weapons (swords and guns). Then there were things like monsters, airships, and magic effects that were obviously not real. The movie itself was not very good and largely predictable.

 

I watched it because I started the game, and I thought the movie was back story, but it contradicted the beginning of the game, or at least it seemed to. There is also an anime series called Brotherhood: Final Fantasy XV (five ten-minute episodes; the whole thing is half the length of Kingsglaive) which follows the events of the movie, but takes place before the game. It highlights the beginning of the game actually, but does not give any of it away, and instead tends to focus on the back story of the four main characters. So basically, the movie and the anime provide back story to the game, which provides none at all. Unlike the old PS1 Final Fantasy games, you don't watch a 5-10 minute CGI movie before the game begins. There's just a conversation between Noctis, the main character, and his father, then they get in the car and take off.

 

I may have gotten a little off topic from the movie, which is what this topic is about. Movies. But this isn't really a regular movie you watch. You watch the movie and the anime with the first chapter or two of the game, as you're able, and it sort of rounds out the experience. If you're considering the game, the movie isn't really a good way to sell the game. Had I only seen the movie, I wouldn't have wanted to play the game. That being said, I gave the movie a 6/10 and the anime a 7/10. Again I did not think the movie was very good, but damn, it sure was pretty to look at.

 

Morgan. Watched this Friday night. I was a bit taken in by the trailer, which promised a movie about a mysterious, gender androgynous figure called Morgan, and they don't really tell you anything else. Then I saw the movie, which quickly establishes that Morgan is a little girl (aged 5, but physically looks 12 and the actress is 20) created in a lab, who is organic but has a computer's neural network in her DNA through the magic of science, so she's awkward like Data from Star Trek and makes some of the same social mistakes, except she's also seriously injured one of the lab techs observing her, so Kate Mara's character is sent to decide whether she should be terminated (put to death) or if the research should continue. That's the premise outlined in the first 5-10 minutes, and you can guess what happens throughout most of the rest of the movie. I gave it a 7/10 because it was interesting and it was fun, and it was only 85 minutes. Much longer and its score would have dropped fast. But it was very much a poor man's Ex Machina.  Also, if you don't sympathize with Morgan, I think you're going to have a worse time. If I didn't, I wouldn't have been as interested.

 

I am new to the topic (haven't posted in previous years' topics), so if you want to see my ratings history, here is my Trakt profile/ratings page. I tend to rate high if I liked a movie, and I don't care as much about technical qualities as I do about how much I liked the movie, and how likely I am to watch it again. I also rate high, though I've been trying to balance it out a bit. But my feeling on rating low is, if a movie's steering to a 5 or below, I'm not going to finish it, and if I don't finish it, I probably won't rate it (because that wouldn't be fair). I have rated a few movies low, but my average is 7 or 8. Then again, most of the movies I rated, I watched because I like them. They were picked because they fit a profile and looked good. Sometimes I will sit through a movie I don't like and then give it a bad rating. And I've adjusted some of my ratings. Anyway, should give you an idea of whether you agree with my tastes or not...

  • Like 2
8 hours ago, dragontology said:

Kingsglaive: Final Fantasy XV. Watched this Saturday night with my wife. The CGI was literally so good it hurt my eyes, and yes I do mean literally. The graphics were so good, the people and a lot of the 'normal things' looked real. The hair was a little exaggerated as were things like the cars and weapons (swords and guns). Then there were things like monsters, airships, and magic effects that were obviously not real. The movie itself was not very good and largely predictable.

 

I watched it because I started the game, and I thought the movie was back story, but it contradicted the beginning of the game, or at least it seemed to. There is also an anime series called Brotherhood: Final Fantasy XV (five ten-minute episodes; the whole thing is half the length of Kingsglaive) which follows the events of the movie, but takes place before the game. It highlights the beginning of the game actually, but does not give any of it away, and instead tends to focus on the back story of the four main characters. So basically, the movie and the anime provide back story to the game, which provides none at all. Unlike the old PS1 Final Fantasy games, you don't watch a 5-10 minute CGI movie before the game begins. There's just a conversation between Noctis, the main character, and his father, then they get in the car and take off.

 

I may have gotten a little off topic from the movie, which is what this topic is about. Movies. But this isn't really a regular movie you watch. You watch the movie and the anime with the first chapter or two of the game, as you're able, and it sort of rounds out the experience. If you're considering the game, the movie isn't really a good way to sell the game. Had I only seen the movie, I wouldn't have wanted to play the game. That being said, I gave the movie a 6/10 and the anime a 7/10. Again I did not think the movie was very good, but damn, it sure was pretty to look at.

 

Morgan. Watched this Friday night. I was a bit taken in by the trailer, which promised a movie about a mysterious, gender androgynous figure called Morgan, and they don't really tell you anything else. Then I saw the movie, which quickly establishes that Morgan is a little girl (aged 5, but physically looks 12 and the actress is 20) created in a lab, who is organic but has a computer's neural network in her DNA through the magic of science, so she's awkward like Data from Star Trek and makes some of the same social mistakes, except she's also seriously injured one of the lab techs observing her, so Kate Mara's character is sent to decide whether she should be terminated (put to death) or if the research should continue. That's the premise outlined in the first 5-10 minutes, and you can guess what happens throughout most of the rest of the movie. I gave it a 7/10 because it was interesting and it was fun, and it was only 85 minutes. Much longer and its score would have dropped fast. But it was very much a poor man's Ex Machina.  Also, if you don't sympathize with Morgan, I think you're going to have a worse time. If I didn't, I wouldn't have been as interested.

 

I am new to the topic (haven't posted in previous years' topics), so if you want to see my ratings history, here is my Trakt profile/ratings page. I tend to rate high if I liked a movie, and I don't care as much about technical qualities as I do about how much I liked the movie, and how likely I am to watch it again. I also rate high, though I've been trying to balance it out a bit. But my feeling on rating low is, if a movie's steering to a 5 or below, I'm not going to finish it, and if I don't finish it, I probably won't rate it (because that wouldn't be fair). I have rated a few movies low, but my average is 7 or 8. Then again, most of the movies I rated, I watched because I like them. They were picked because they fit a profile and looked good. Sometimes I will sit through a movie I don't like and then give it a bad rating. And I've adjusted some of my ratings. Anyway, should give you an idea of whether you agree with my tastes or not...

Wow, really thorough reviews!

 

Kinda feel you should start a thread for each movie review you do :p

 

Also, last movie of FF I watched was Advent children and enjoyed it a lot! Having no previous FF experiences (gaming nor anime)

  • Like 2

HO00003779.jpg

 

7/10

Though I feel it could have been longer, like explaining why they where in the forrest (Though it was implied) and perhaps a final closing scene to what their lives had become with that upbringing (after all, the movie does emphasize a lot on that)

  • Like 2

Watched The Accountant last night. Ben Affleck is his usual wooden, could-be-Adam-Sandler's-older-brother-slash-father self, but he plays a good autism/Aspergers um, patient? Sufferer? Affleck plays a guy who suffered with autism as a child, but through extensive training, has learned to control himself. He still has many nervous twitches, but lives as an accountant. He's brilliant and capable of photographic memory and bizarre, almost supernatural mental calculations. He's brought in to audit a robotics company that is about to go public, but as he discovers their secrets (which he was not meant to find), his past begins to unravel and things go sideways.

 

On the nerd level, it's pretty cool, but the story makes a few quick leaps for convenience to tie everything together, and a lot of the second half just doesn't make sense. If it was as well put together as the rest, it could have been an 8/10, possibly, but I gave it a 7/10.

 

14 hours ago, Draconian Guppy said:

 

Wow, really thorough reviews!

 

Kinda feel you should start a thread for each movie review you do :p

 

Also, last movie of FF I watched was Advent children and enjoyed it a lot! Having no previous FF experiences (gaming nor anime)

Thanks. Don't want to clutter the forum though. One thread for all the reviews, closed at the end of the year and renewed each January is a great idea. Keeps things on track.

 

For Final Fantasy, if you have the time for a game, you should try to play Final Fantasy 7. It's on Steam, but I'm not sure if it's been fixed. Shortly after the game came out on PC, and it was 3 CDs on PS1, and 4 on PC (install disc and three game discs), a hacker/cracker/whatever released an "Ultima Edition" on the "warez scene." Not only did this reduce the game to 2 CDs (it's 2 ISO's, IIRC), but they also fixed a game breaking bug Squaresoft left in. After the first city, which takes about 10 hours to complete, there's a scene where the game just crashes, and apparently it will every time. You can probably get the patch separately. I would HOPE that it's included in the Steam version. But the patch was never official. My best guess is that it's not included. So I would pay for the game, because it really is worth paying for... and then just download it. As much as I hate to suggest black market gaming. Square should have admitted that they screwed up the release, paid the author of the patch a few grand, and then published it on their site. But instead, they pretended that the issue did not exist, and ignored complaints. Really sad situation. The PS1 version does not have the bug in the first place. If you can get a PS1, that's the best/most legit way to play the game. If you do it on PC you would have to jump through hoops. But it's so worth it. The game is not hard at all, and it's one of the best stories I've seen, in games, in movies, in TV, or anywhere. In typical Japanese fashion they don't spell it out for you like American writers tend to do, but they give you more than enough dots to connect. And if you connect them, it's a pretty emotional experience at the end. Though, I think a lot of the Final Fantasy games have that effect on people. That's why people go to such great lengths to defend their favorite, whether it's 6, 7, or 8. Those are the common ones, but the others have their champions, too. But 7 is absolutely Square's baby. It's the one that saved them way back when, and it started the 'cinematic' trend that continues today through Final Fantasy 15, just released last month (or maybe November).

 

14 hours ago, Draconian Guppy said:

HO00003779.jpg

 

7/10

Though I feel it could have been longer, like explaining why they where in the forrest (Though it was implied) and perhaps a final closing scene to what their lives had become with that upbringing (after all, the movie does emphasize a lot on that)

Damn, I meant to see this. Looks really good. 

  • Like 2

Apologies for the double post. And for including the poster in my quote. Just realized I did that. Not cool. Cool that Draconian Guppy included it. Not cool that I quoted it. Maybe a mod could be so kind as to edit the image out of my post? Just leave a *snip* or something.

 

Just watched The Girl on the Train. Confusing movie. I wasn't sure I'd stick with it. It jumps around a lot in the first act (about 45 minutes) and I felt unnecessarily. But stick with it, and it starts to make sense. Don't really want to say much more than that, since once it does start making sense, things start changing, and spoilers and such. Overall it's about a 6.5/10, but since the sites I rate on (IMDb and Trakt.tv) only use whole numbers, I went up to 7/10 rather than down to 6.

  • Like 1
On 11/1/2017 at 4:50 AM, dragontology said:

Apologies for the double post. And for including the poster in my quote. Just realized I did that. Not cool. Cool that Draconian Guppy included it. Not cool that I quoted it. Maybe a mod could be so kind as to edit the image out of my post? Just leave a *snip* or something.

 

Just watched The Girl on the Train. Confusing movie. I wasn't sure I'd stick with it. It jumps around a lot in the first act (about 45 minutes) and I felt unnecessarily. But stick with it, and it starts to make sense. Don't really want to say much more than that, since once it does start making sense, things start changing, and spoilers and such. Overall it's about a 6.5/10, but since the sites I rate on (IMDb and Trakt.tv) only use whole numbers, I went up to 7/10 rather than down to 6.

there's actually a forum:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/forum/187-movie-ratings/

  • Like 3

Just watched all 4 Indiana Jones movies again. Watching them all in a row, it's pretty stunning how bad Crystal Skull was. Even Harrison's acting was terrible.

  • Like 1

TheWailing-poster-final.jpg

 

 

Very good Korean movie. Had to watch some youtube videos and browse some reddit to fully grasp all the cultural dimensions. Movie keeps you on your toes and makes you think.

 

8/10

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5215952/

 

 

  • Like 1

On the World Cinema theme

 

Ek Peheli Leela

 

ek-paheli-leela-movie-april-10.jpg

 

Karenjit Kaur Vohra (aka Sunny Leone)

The rest are mostly unknowns

 

A reminiscent movie about a 300 year old legend (based on very old Bollywood Cinema <60's-80's>)

Mostly an Iconic Location set movie.

 

Meera, an Model goes to India, Rajasthan, and remembers a previous life.

Murder, unfinished business, lost love....

 

7/10

purely for the locations, the acting was about par for what would be a low budget movie (not surprising when taking into consideration Sunny's paycheque :p )

 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Raees

 

raees.jpg

 

SRK as Raees

Movie felt a little reminiscent of Scarface, in this instance, set in prohibition, Gujarat,

Raees, a smuggler, built an empire around his booze manufacturing and smuggling industry.

Honest thief undertones,

 

6/10

  • Like 3

Arrival  9/10

 

Denis Villeneuve has become one of my favorite directors, movies such as Sicario (and Benicio Del Toro's chilling performance), Prisoners and Incendies are fantastic.

 

VtYMs7O.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 2

large_Arrival-Poster-2016.jpg

 

Starting on the oscar bits

 

i'd say  7/10   acting was great, supporting actor kinda meh. I would have liked more story or at least a hint of a proper follow up on "WHY ARE THEY HERE" and time travel and sequel.

Eg. Them coming to earth to show Louise Banks the future isn't the why, that's the consequence of the way (Eg. we will need your help)

  • Like 2

The Rush Hour trilogy

I won't bother posting images as I'm on a tablet

 

Jackie Chan, Chris Tucker.

 

10/10 

 

Sat and watched them with my wife and kids, loved it.

The movies were good too

  • Like 2
20 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

The Rush Hour trilogy

I won't bother posting images as I'm on a tablet

 

Jackie Chan, Chris Tucker.

 

10/10 

 

Sat and watched them with my wife and kids, loved it.

The movies were good too

yeah nice popcorn flicks.

 

I'd love a 4th with them being older!

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!