Recommended Posts

Same lineup.

Batting lineup:

  • Abel
  • Baker
  • Charles
  • Daniel
  • Edward
  • Frank
  • George
  • Hooker
  • Irwin

Abel walks. Baker walks. Charles forces Baker. Edward bats in Daniel's turn. While Edward is at bat, Abel scores and Charles goes to second on a wild pitch. Edward grounds out, sending Charles to third. What is the ruling if the defensive team appeals (a) immediately or (b) after a pitch to Daniel?

If a batter goes up to the plate and nothing is said till after the at bat, it as if he went in order and there are no penalties.

If something is said when he steps into the batters box, the batter who was skipped is out.

(a) Abel's run counts and Charles is entitled to second base since these advances were not made because of the improper batter batting a ball or advancing to first base. Charles must return to second base because his advance to third resulted from the improper batter batting a ball. Daniel is called out, and Edward is the proper batter;

(b) Abel's run counts and Charles stays on third. The proper batter is Frank.

Two outs, bases loaded, 3-2 count. With all runners going on the pitch, the batter takes ball four. R2 touches and rounds 3rd and is picked off by the catcher before the runner from 3rd touches the plate. Does the run score?

A relief pitcher enters the game with 2 outs and a runner at first. Without delivering a single pitch, the new pitcher successfully picks off R1, thus retiring the side. The manager now inserts a pinch-hitter for the reliever, who is due to lead off the next half-inning. Is this legal?

Edited by Remote
What Happened to tucker on the play?

Did he get a hit? what kind of a hit?

Did he get an RBI?

Tucker is out for passing the preceding runner. If the fielder didin't catch his drive, then it's a hit. You didn't mention if the runner on third went home, but if he did before Tucker passed the other runner, it's an RBI (this is not a force play).

Tucker is out for passing the preceding runner. If the fielder didin't catch his drive, then it's a hit. You didn't mention if the runner on third went home, but if he did before Tucker passed the other runner, it's an RBI (this is not a force play).

Thats correct, I changed it though, so if you dont see the question people, know that its because I deleted it and replaced with better ones

Two outs, bases loaded, 3-2 count. With all runners going on the pitch, the batter takes ball four. R2 touches and rounds 3rd and is picked off by the catcher before the runner from 3rd touches the plate. Does the run score?

Yes., the run is forced home. You might tell me why the catcher was near third, though. :p

A relief pitcher enters the game with 2 outs and a runner at first. Without delivering a single pitch, the new pitcher successfully picks off R1, thus retiring the side. The manager now inserts a pinch-hitter for the reliever, who is due to lead off the next half-inning. Is this legal?

I'm going to say it's legal. It's no different than switching batters after a pitcher change, IMO.

I know you're going to get me on this, because it rings a bell. Oh well. LD

The Batter doubles but misses first base. "Time" is called. After the ball is put back into play, the pitcher balks when he attempts to make an appeal at 1st base. What is the call?

You can't balk during an appeal, you must advise the ump you are appealing and the pitcher would not have to be on the rubber to throw the ball to first anyway.

Since it was an illegal bat, the run does not score, and charles goes back to his original base.

If they fail to appeal everyone stays where they are at, run scored, and it's Edward's bat.

/edit dang! That's what I get for leaving for a few, and coming back and replying....

You can't balk during an appeal, you must advise the ump you are appealing and the pitcher would not have to be on the rubber to throw the ball to first anyway.

That is incorrect. When you appeal the ball is live. A balk will result in a null of the appeal and the runner is awareded a base.

Yes., the run is forced home. You might tell me why the catcher was near third, though. :p

I'm going to say it's legal. It's no different than switching batters after a pitcher change, IMO.

I know you're going to get me on this, because it rings a bell. Oh well. LD

Correct.

Correct.

the infield fly rule is: if runners are on 1st and 2nd or on the corners or the bases are loaded with elss than 2 out, and the batter pops up on the infield, and the umpire deems the ball catchable by an infielder, the batter shall be out and the ball dead. this is to avoid the fielder purposefully dropping the ball to cause a double or triple play.

OHHH! Wow, I used to play softball in middle school and summer before I started high school and the in-field fly rule applied to us and I could never understand why, haha. I was a sucker for hitting pop-ups. Thanks! (Y)

Runner on 2nd base with two outs. Batter hits one over the fence. As R2 rounds third he trips on the base and falls down. The third base coach helps him up and he continues home. What's the call?

That is legal....the play is dead if the ball is hit over the fence, but if the play is live the runner is called out. Any contact between coach and runner results in an out.

As for the whole tie goes to the runner thing....that is not true. Even on very close plays at first, if the umpire is in the right position, you can easily tell whether the runner is safe or out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
    • is that a personal preference? whether it is or isn't, i get where you're coming from. i try to get and use fully open sourced applications whenever i can but there are instances where i find a superior product that is closed sourced. in these cases i do my best to learn about the company, who operates it, their background, parent and sub structure etc. to some extent, depending on "the smell test". i really believe that Syncback is really and truly something great. even if you don't use it, it's always worth a recommendation to someone else, especially if that someone else is not very computer literate. for someone of your calibre you, you'll manage just fine with Syncthing, no doubt about it.
    • I agree, especially if it is cloud sourced, like this one is.. but I wouldn't say no to a local AI assistant similar to the Zettlab one which would be really helpful with my large Photos library, but also to perform tasks like installing Docker apps rather than me having to do it via Docker Compose, but I don't think we're quite there yet. Synology Photos is somewhat AI, you can ask it to search for certain people (if you have tagged them and it will attempt to match similar photos to the person) and if you put a search term in for "cars" for example, it will show you all photos with a car.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!