Janet Jackson Boob Slip!

[kak]

What would you do if Britney Spears's ###### was shown at this detail? You'd be all over it. Janet Jackson was AMAZING in her prime, and she still is pretty hot. All you people who post negative things about it obviously have issues.

[generalnewbie]

HMM WELL I HAVE SOME HIGH DEF PICS that came my way..

1 good one.. and one better one..

take a peek

Images Removed

TELL ME THAT ISNT A REAL NIPPLE WITH SOME ART ON IT

Edited February 2, 2004 by BOOGSoftball

[Son of Hook]

A darker Michael with boobs....

As for everyone saying it's not a big deal:

With a child in the room when the moment happens, perhaps you'd think a bit differently.

It was definately staged. I fail to see how anyone could say it wasn't.

[Blues]

3 reaons why it was stages

1. mtv produced it

2. the last lyrics of the song are

"gonna have you naked by the end of this song"

3. If it was "accidental" then why was the outfit made specefically to come apart liek tha, with snap on buttons ?

(gimme a really good reason)

[YaddaMe]

oh god, here we go with the negativety....

I find it perplexing that people would get all up in arms about a partially covered female breast, yet they don't give a **** about more important and pressing social issues in our nation... People need to ****ing grow up. And people that are pretending to be so damn offended should quit being such ****ing hypocrites.

its funny how this is a big deal for american television......I find that US television is the most censored POS I would ever imagine to watch...I mean, a nipple, big deal, look in the mirror, there's a nipple, I flick on ABC and see people getting killed all the time...which is worse?

I take it none of you had an 8yr old sitting next to you watching?

Was the act itself all that bad? No it wasn't, you can find plenty worse on tv mid-day. The problem lies with the fact that one shouldn't have to worry about their children seeing this during the Superbowl, or so they thought.

I dont have kids, So myself, Im not all that upset about it... but I can easily easily see how a parent, watching the game with their kid would be outraged. Also, the game was broadcast to who knows how many countries... while some are quite a bit more candid on what they show on tv, just as many are more uptight than the US. Now matter how you wish to view it... it was innapropriate for the Superbowl.

What I do find utterly amazing over the whole ordeal, is Timberlake insulting everyone's intelligence by stating it was an accident.

[digipoi]

As for everyone saying it's not a big deal:

With a child in the room when the moment happens, perhaps you'd think a bit differently.

It was definitely not cool with children present.

[digipoi]

What I do find utterly amazing over the whole ordeal, is Timberlake insulting everyone's intelligence by stating it was an accident.

Timberlake will always be an absolute moron. Insulting no ones intelligence, making himself look like an ass by his statements.

[HellBender]

Hell, its definitely not cool with parents present!!

My parents, my friend's parents, and his grandparents were all in the room when it happened. They're very religious people, and they dont even let their son get many video games cause theres too much violence.

I turned a bright shade of red when it happened.

[idkfa]

If i had kids I wouldn't mind if they saw that, just like my parents weren't all "ooh no, there's a sex scene on tv, quick, cover your eyes". I understand everyones opinion on that kind of matter differ, but to me I believe its best (with moderation of course) to not be so sensitive about what children should see.

[axis]

Grow up people. The only ones who got mad about this are christian mothers who control there kids and probably PETA, because I am sure in some way this harmed an animal. You have become so used to sensorship and trained like dogs. We did not see any of these closeups on the TV, not one person actually could see her nipple. Get a friend and stop whining.

[underthebridge]

jeez, if I go to europe I can see ###### in a shampoo commercial.. and this is during daytime!

[kombolcha]

Removed

Edited February 2, 2004 by BOOGSoftball

[John Veteran]

Removed

sadly, i had to work tonight, so i missed everything after the first quarter :/ but i just watched that and LMFAO, how can it NOT be intentional? :rofl: god, this society is so obscessed with sex, i can't stand it :rolleyes: why the F*CK do they have to do that during the superbowl? :angry:

Edited February 2, 2004 by BOOGSoftball

[reactionary007]

the superbowl ended hours ago and this thread is still going! everytime i come to neowin its on the front page list...

[adamp2p]

You guys are funny...sure as hell got me laughin'!

[xpablo]

Hey she's got to compete with that tart Britney Spears and the famous Kiss !

so she flashed a ###### and had a star covering her nipple !

Janet is Hot, total babe !!!!

But I still say Latoya Jackson & Michael Jackson are the same person.

[Fusion]

How could that not be intentional. Does she just wear a star over her nipple at all times? That is such a blatant lie it is unbelievable. Especially with the song, "I'm gonna have you naked by the end of this song." I mean, do they really expect anyone to buy that?

[Pigsweeeper]

that was a piercing so she probably does wear it all the time. . .

[Laughing-Man]

She has a pierced nipple and I think the sun was a decorative nipple ring. I remember a few years back when she was releasing a new cd and the cover apparently had her nipple ring showing. Like this incident, it had people up in arms. I really cannot tell if this performance was stagged or not. The only thing that makes me think it was not staged was the fact that the camera taping them turned away pretty quickly after her shirt was ripped.

I do not see what the big deal is anyway. If you watch TV in foreign countries the girls are topless in some commericals. And those tabloid magazines sold in stores have naked people on the cover all the time.

[John Veteran]

cbs is just a ratings ###### :rolleyes:

survivor is the worst show ever because it started the whole not-real "reality tv" genre, which is utterly pathetic.

their sitcoms aren't funny at all. i was watching the commercials while i was waiting for the game to start (i never watch cbs) and i'm just thinking, "that's supposed to be funny? :huh:"

now with this stupid janet jackson thing, they've shot themselves in the foot as far as i'm concerned. keep the damn nudity in the tv-14/PG-13 shows and movies, NOT on public television :hmmm: and also, i had some respect for janet jackson because she's not much like her brother, but now... my respect for her has gone down (N)

edit: though it's not just cbs, it's tv in general. look at any of the shows on tv now, and the majority of them will either have nudity, controversial themes, language, lots of violence with blood... (note: damn, i'm turning into my parents :|) probably why i watch no more than a few hours of tv a week anymore.

[Don]

it was probably planned by Justin and Janet, I highly doubt CBS knew about it, it seems like a publicity stunt to me.. maybe Justin is trying to compete with Britney Spears/Madonna Kiss

[neoufo51]

Check out the pic

Ugh, censored crap. If we can't handle an old lady's ######, then America is no different then the clerics in the Middle East who tell women they can't show more than a face.

Here is what happened.

Image Removed

Edited February 2, 2004 by BOOGSoftball

[VegaOne]

i got da pic

Image Removed

[Don]

I have a real close up of it, u can see its not covered and the thing on her nip is a pericing/ring but I dont think I can post it here

[neoufo51]

I have a real close up of it, u can see its not covered and the thing on her nip is a pericing/ring but I dont think I can post it here

Yeah, doubtful it was an accident. I saw that closeup too, posted it here somewhere. Oh well.