Recommended Posts

Good news...no engines on the water tower...that's off...for now.../s

 

The engines would have to be Raptors...these ones shown may be weld jigs...will find out soon. (mention Merlin on a particular forum and have your hand slapped...for good reason)

 

It would accomplish nothing to use Merlins...other than prove lift. The intent is to model Raptor behavior on this rig before software/hardware configs on the "real deal...at port right now.

 

The engines will be in a line because of the ability of thrust balance for a choice of 1, 2 or 3 engines lit.

 

That's my take...online opinion #12,693,336.4 ...

with reference to this tweet again...

 

 

 

DvxNw71WwAAlUQQ.jpg

 

While this unit was on the concrete "silo base", there was a lower circumference row of metal covering the engines.

 

The silo base is hollow and has an entrance. The engines may have been there all along and no one noticed due to them being covered.

 

Pull the unit off the concrete base, remove lower shield covering...boom...we have engines.

 

From memory, I believe that the vac units were for testing and sea level units to be used much later...will have to check to see if this has changed...unless one of you guys heard....

 

// being that this is the "ship" , the vac units would get most of the work unless EDL or lift-off (a lower gravity well world)

They keep building segments 😵

 

Cell phone pic from last night, but it shows the huge new ring segment and they're polishing the propulsion segment. There are newly cut large circular openings, which look like they're for umbilical fittings.

There are also stainless steel panels near the Sprung structure for covering the legs, and some major curved pieces came in by flatbed. These have closely spaced edge holes, so likely for a pressurized structure - probably the prop tanks. 

At the launch site it looks like they're prepping an LZ-x style pad.

 

 

  • Like 1

Testing hardware. Not going up past 5,000 feet and not anywhere close to speeds past 50 mph or anything beyond (lower than) 80 degrees vertical. It's just up-and-down for this one.

8 hours ago, flyingskippy said:

Is this really going to be flight hardware built in the field by a water tower company? I can't wrap my head around this one. My instinct says mock up, but there is that SpaceX factor. 

 

Stop and think about it; Caldwell  specializes in building lightweight but super-strong stainless steel tanks and their base towers. Who better?

 

Low altitude test bed, and making  eyebrows twist into knots is a SpaceX specialty 😀

 

 

  • Like 2

Small shop owners, do-it-yourselfers, small industrial fab...this is what we do.

 

No clean rooms, you do the best you can with what you have, make your own jigs, trial and error most times...your knowledge is what makes the difference.

 

This is standard stainless steel applications....how many TIG welders in your area, how many in your state, province, country....the expertise is known.

 

This is like a mega fun weekend when the group gets together and builds the unlikely...again....only this one is up a few notches.

 

One could check the bill when they are done....any bets against this being cheaper than...ULA, Ariane,NASA, Boeing, LM........(crickets)

 

Many people have become accustomed to the High end agencies and their equipment/processes....some not knowing that similar projects happen all the time in the unusual spots...cross town rental building, on the farm, industrial malls,peoples basements and garages.

 

This project is pretty cool...as are numerous others quietly being carried out as we speak...this is ingenuity.😎

  • Like 3

ULA/NG/LH-M/(Insert Mil/Gov supplier name here):

"How'd you build this?"

"After three years of committee, thinktank, alpha beta and delta design review, and other discussions with the ten Supervisors up and down the chain, we're finally prototyping. Problem is we've already spent $200 million and it's not matching up to the design we reviewed."
"Well, that's not a problem, we'll petition for more DoD funds and more time. We don't necessarily have to come up with anything useful."

 

SpaceX:

"Hey, let's build this in the south Texas climate out in the open."
"Why?"

"Because it's easier than trucking this thing halfway across the country in pieces. AND it's gonna have to deal with the weather anyway."

"Okay."

"And we wanna test it there."

"Oooh, that's clever. That'll save a ton of money."

"Oh, mind if we bring in some TIG welders we know to help out? They're pretty good."

"HOW good?"

".... they make junk into art."

"Done."

 

:rofl:

Don't get me wrong. From a bottom line and SpaceX point of view it makes complete sense. It goes against the grain of everything and everyone in the industry. If I were to tell someone that this was going to lead to a spaceship capable of carrying 100 people to and from Mars, they would probably look at me if I was crazy. The details just can't come soon enough on this one.

  • Like 2

It's obvious that the leg section is the meat and potatoes of the structure. Their FCC application talks about flights up to 15km and durations of 5 min. The nose section probably would only need to withstand 40 or 50 knot relative wind and wind aloft.

Just my opinion and not meant towards anyone....

 

There has been a lot of chatter on line about the upper "tin foil" ..mostly from those with apparently little actual fab experience.

 

1431533525_blowupofuppercone.thumb.jpg.9cc179fefaead717e3a1df4a6b2cbfac.jpg

 

1402437772_metalgauges.thumb.jpg.a4bc1ab9e9b348470aba26e57ae23421.jpg

 

35 page SS Users guide, pdf   Everything that one needs to know for "generalities"...not the "exotics".

 

The "official" specifications have not been released for anything on the hopper.

 

The upper looks to be composed of 1" hollow structural tubing with light gauge sheeting, possibly 20 gauge.

 

I have no issue putting this type of structure on front of a vehicle on a track at 200 kph...but that's me.

 

Read and make your call...it will do fine for this "hopper"....

  • Like 1

Scott Manley did a video on the hopper. It is pretty informative. Apparently someone did calculations and figured out it should only take one Raptor to get it off the ground. So, sit back grab a beer cause when this one lites it should be really uh.....hoppy.

 

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!