Recommended Posts

There's a LOT of construction coming up; the legs and fins on both Starships, the Coco FL Starship being transported to KSC, the Cocoa FL Super Heavy booster build starting (19+ ring segments are already fabbed), LC-39A modifications, etc. 

 

Busy-Busy....

  • Like 1

That's pretty awesome, it looks like it made the hop between the two pads fairly effortlessly.

 

So next is the Space X presentation which was expected to happen Mid Sept? Hopefully a Star ship prototype will be ready soon after to do hopper tests also?

7 hours ago, Skiver said:

That's pretty awesome, it looks like it made the hop between the two pads fairly effortlessly.

 

So next is the Space X presentation which was expected to happen Mid Sept? Hopefully a Star ship prototype will be ready soon after to do hopper tests also?

 

Musk will likely want to show off  an assembled Mk1 vehicle during the presentation. 

 

Starship Mk1 at Boca Chica should be getting her fins etc. soon since some airfoils were trucked in a few days ago, and pics of workers preparing the modules for them are now public.

Yeah ... diminishing returns on engine output vs fuel consumption, no matter how good Raptor becomes, will limit how heavy it can be (therefore how tall it will be). It will gain some height, though -- just not a linear scale upwards. I still think 18 meters is too wide. There's no possible way it can pack 70-100 engines ... it would destroy itself from any number of acoustic energies and other effects simply igniting all of those engines not to mention being inefficient (diminishing returns again) and way too complicated to engineer (let alone build).

 

It'd call for an upscaled Raptor design ... and I'm not certain that SpaceX is ready for that yet. They wanna get Raptor fully ironed out and flying, then evolve it over a service life of 5~10 years (or more) like they've done with the Merlin series. If they were to go that route (upscaled Raptor) they'd HAVE to get started on it NOW.

 

Now -- could Raptor see iterative gains like Merlin, where it sees double the efficiency and nearly 3x the thrust output (or more)? Sure, as long as the SpaceX boffins put in that R&D and don't cut corners. It won't just be the engine itself but the platform that'll contribute to that endeavour. The current gen of Falcon-9 is so much more than the 1.0 version that really it's only the outer shell that's anything like the first iteration (and that isn't even completely the same nowadays, what with that composite upperstage at the top 1/5th of the booster).

 

The next 20 years are going to be very interesting, development-wise and evolutionary-wise, for Starship and Super Heavy. Not sure how feasible 18m is actually gonna be though ... 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!