Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DocM said:

FAA Operations Plan Advisory for Feb. 26 includes a SpaceX Starship launch,

 

https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_spt.jsp

 

No Evacuation notice has been given so likely another SF at this point

Well ... they nailed the landing ... now just gotta keep it from undergoing a RUD after landing.  :) 

 

Will be interesting to see what the cause was ... wouldn't doubt if the bottom tank got breached by flame.  It seemed like it was still cooking a little after landing ... the "launch" appeared to be the bottom tank releasing its contents (methane?).  Just my observation.  

Looked like some legs didn't lock when they deployed, causing it to land hard and stand on a rear fin. Then a leak (lines? tank?) caused the post-landing fire which a while later blew the tanks.

 

These were Legs v1.0 with improvements in SN-11, and further upgrades should be in in SN-15. SN's 12-14 have been scrapped as SN-15 makes the early vehicle design obsolete. SN-11 should roll out soon, with SN-15 stacking in the High Bay.

 

This is 'hardware rich development,' which is a bit like Whack-a-Mole; build, launch, break, fix, repeat. 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

SpaceX's Principal Integration Engineer/webcaster "Big John" Insprucker refers to the belly flop a the "Adama Maneuver" and former astronaut/head of SpaceX Commercial Crew Garrett Reisman seconded it. Guess that makes it official 😃

 

#SoSayWeAll #BSG

 

 

 

On 04/03/2021 at 04:07, DocM said:

Looked like some legs didn't lock when they deployed, causing it to land hard and stand on a rear fin. Then a leak (lines? tank?) caused the post-landing fire which a while later blew the tanks.

 

These were Legs v1.0 with improvements in SN-11, and further upgrades should be in in SN-15. SN's 12-14 have been scrapped as SN-15 makes the early vehicle design obsolete. SN-11 should roll out soon, with SN-15 stacking in the High Bay.

 

This is 'hardware rich development,' which is a bit like Whack-a-Mole; build, launch, break, fix, repeat. 

 

I'm sure Elon said they were still working on leg concepts so the fact the thing stood as long as it did was pretty amazing.

I saw a tweet from Michael B from NSF that there are road closures coming on Monday so he's speculating that might be SN11s rollout to the pad then.

13 hours ago, Skiver said:

I'm sure Elon said they were still working on leg concepts so the fact the thing stood as long as it did was pretty amazing.

I saw a tweet from Michael B from NSF that there are road closures coming on Monday so he's speculating that might be SN11s rollout to the pad then.

The next leg iteration isn't "the big one" but that's coming.  And yes, the SN-11 rollout should happen next week.

 

Meanwhile, the Super Heavy thrust puck testing hardware is arriving. Part of Super Heavy BN-1 is in the High Bay behind SN-11.

 

 

Well, well...

 

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/new-nasa-partnerships-to-mature-commercial-space-technologies-capabilities

 

Quote

SpaceX will partner with NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, to capture imagery and thermal measurements of its Starship vehicle during orbital re-entry over the Pacific Ocean. With the data, the company plans to advance a reusable thermal protection system, which protects the vehicle from aerodynamic heating, for missions returning from low-Earth orbit, the Moon, and Mars.

 

Updated SpaceX Boca Chica site plans were found on an Army Corps of Engineers site, about 29 mb.

 

https://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Media/Public-Notices/Article/2524314/swg-2013-00381-space-exploration-technologies-inc-spacex-wetlands-cameron-count/

 

Quote

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:  SpaceX proposed to modify the existing permit for the continued development of the SpaceX vertical launch area with the expansion and addition of test, orbital, and landing pads, integration towers, associated infrastructure, stormwater management features and vehicle parking.  The proposed expansion will impact 10.94 acres of mud flats, 5.94 acres of estuarine wetlands, and 0.28 acres of non-tidal wetlands. 

 

PDF

 

https://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Portals/26/docs/regulatory/PN March/Plans_201300381.pdf?ver=hid3b2HjHCZZNucHf1LGzw%3D%3D

 

Highlighting the changes...

 

 

 

Edited by DocM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!