Recommended Posts

On 6/16/2019 at 1:31 PM, BudMan said:

yeah this system seems a bit over the top if you ask me.. You have 5 users.. Really raid 6 for what amount of data?  How much were those drives?  They are only 1.2TB?  You prob have saved money just getting SDD and doing Raid 1 if you were worried about something failing..

 

The box is prob way over the top cost wise for 5 people... You could prob of gotten by with some $1000 off the shelf nas to be honest... You sure don't need to be paying the MS tax for windows server licenses with 5 users.. Any NAS os would allow you to be a "domain" and central user management, without paying the ms tax..

I get where you're coming from, but the database stuff I have to run is Windows based. I don't think any of it would install on a NAS. I know I went overkill on it probably, but I just decided that I'll pay what I pay and just have enough power for growth.

5 minutes ago, patseguin said:

Here's a question for you guys. Can I keep my current server on the network since it already has my embroidery design database running and just use it solely as an embroidery design database server? I'm wondering if I'll have to change its IP address and demote it from a domain controller. I'm guess I will have to do that. Right now it is 192.168.10.2 which AFAIK is the standard setting for a server. I'll make my new server 192.168.10.2 and just change the old server to to a dynamic IP and connect it to the domain that will be set up on new server. Does this sound like a reasonable plan?

I would plan a migration to get it off of that old unsupported hardware, but you **could** keep it there. 

 

**i wouldn’t recommend it 

 

if it stores info that computers need to get to, it should have a static address. 

4 minutes ago, sc302 said:

I would plan a migration to get it off of that old unsupported hardware, but you **could** keep it there. 

 

**i wouldn’t recommend it 

 

if it stores info that computers need to get to, it should have a static address. 

Good points. I'm just anticipating in advance if there is any compatibility issue with my embroidery database software and Server 2019. If I absolutely have to for now, I'll configure the old server with a NEW static IP and let it be the design file server for now. I'm just not sure what issues I'll have with that server still on the network. I've never demoted a domain controller before.

It is relatively easy. Transfer the fsmo roles over and the global catalog role over.  You can then demote the old one. It isn’t difficult by any means but if you don’t know, you don’t know.  

 

As stated, if you wish, put it on the network and I will take over the rest. 

 

Also do with the FileMaker Pro, install on the new server and copy the db over and see what happens.   The pcs won’t connect (different mappings/odbc) but you can see what breaks before killing the old server completely. 

12 minutes ago, sc302 said:

It is relatively easy. Transfer the fsmo roles over and the global catalog role over.  You can then demote the old one. It isn’t difficult by any means but if you don’t know, you don’t know.  

 

As stated, if you wish, put it on the network and I will take over the rest. 

 

Also do with the FileMaker Pro, install on the new server and copy the db over and see what happens.   The pcs won’t connect (different mappings/odbc) but you can see what breaks before killing the old server completely. 

Have you done server work for me before? I had a cell number for a neowin guy who did some config for me a year or so ago but I replaced that phone and can't find who it was!!

I just looked that filemaker pro will run on windows 10, 8, shoot even 7.. The lastest 17 version... So yeah fire up some 1000 nas, and run windows a VM on it for your filemaker pro.. Zero reason to pay the MS tax any more then you need too.. They don't even say on their site that it will run on windows server versions..  Only workstation versions of windows are actually certified.

6 minutes ago, BudMan said:

I just looked that filemaker pro will run on windows 10, 8, shoot even 7.. The lastest 17 version... So yeah fire up some 1000 nas, and run windows a VM on it for your filemaker pro.. Zero reason to pay the MS tax any more then you need too.. They don't even say on their site that it will run on windows server versions..  Only workstation versions of windows are actually certified.

It's Filemaker Server that hosts the files. In fact, I did some research and it seems that FM Server won't even run on non-server OS's...

4 hours ago, BudMan said:

ah - you just stated filemaker pro ;)

OK here is just the beginning of my problems. Trying to dcpromo and I get a "general error". Any idea what to do?

 

 

 

IMG_0493.jpg

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

6 hours ago, BudMan said:

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

None taken. I am the owner, I was following a tutorial online for setting up active directory. I connected it but I didn't use DHCP. I configured the network adapter with a static IP and configured DNS before I ran dcpromo. Sc302 is on vacation so I decided to try it myself.

7 hours ago, BudMan said:

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

6 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I figured since I've been building and configuring PC's for years, I could configure a "simple" server. I was following this guide: https://www.moderndeployment.com/windows-server-2019-active-directory-installation-beginners-guide/

 

But  ran into that error.

 

Should I try that web based config tool that it offered me to download? I'm not sure if or how I can undo by DNS config, just so I can start all over...

3 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

There is nothing difficult about it and it is easy. It is the over compensating for a click click next process that is difficult. Sometimes you have to go with the flow.   Also reading screens is helpful at times.  I don’t know it has been a long while since I setup an ad controller, not sure if I can remember the process, I may actually have to read the screens to make sure it doesn’t get hosed.  You should also know a dc can’t be a dhcp’d client, it can host dhcp, it doesn’t have to, but it does need a static address...but an error should come up stating that. Making it a member server also makes it a little easier vs trying to go to a dc right out of the box. 

 

Second Out of the box dc really needs dns set up prior, seems to like it much better (less errors) if it has sync’d with the existing ad environment first.  If I remember, it saved the reboot  causing you to add it to the domain prior to promoting. Not really the Microsoft approved way or trained on way for their certification path. 

3 hours ago, sc302 said:

There is nothing difficult about it and it is easy. It is the over compensating for a click click next process that is difficult. Sometimes you have to go with the flow.   Also reading screens is helpful at times.  I don’t know it has been a long while since I setup an ad controller, not sure if I can remember the process, I may actually have to read the screens to make sure it doesn’t get hosed.  You should also know a dc can’t be a dhcp’d client, it can host dhcp, it doesn’t have to, but it does need a static address...but an error should come up stating that. Making it a member server also makes it a little easier vs trying to go to a dc right out of the box. 

 

Second Out of the box dc really needs dns set up prior, seems to like it much better (less errors) if it has sync’d with the existing ad environment first.  If I remember, it saved the reboot  causing you to add it to the domain prior to promoting. Not really the Microsoft approved way or trained on way for their certification path. 

I’m sorry, but the fact that you had to write all of that to explain what you regard as ‘basics’ means that this isn’t ‘simple’ or ‘something that anyone can do’. 

 

I’m not arguing with what the right thing to do is (although I do maintain that I believe setting up a domain for 5 users is overkill and a workgroup would probably be sufficient), but you still have to be an ‘expert’ to do it. 

 

If you go this route, you get a pro to do the work so that it is done properly and not just fumbled through by someone who half (at best) understands the concepts behind what is actually happening. 

There is nothing easy about it. I finally disabled the iDRAC network port and the ethernet #2 port, leaving just 1 ethernet port. After that, AD seemed to install and the server rebooted and now appears to be on the domain that I created. It was easy, I could now just connect my workstations. But, I guess I have to do more Googling and figure out how to configure forward and reverse lookup zones or forests or whatever. I tried connecting to the new domain with my workstation just for giggles but of course that new domain couldn't be found on the network.

1 hour ago, Fahim S. said:

setting up a domain for 5 users is overkill

There is no contorted gymnastics of human imagination for which a 5 user AD makes sense.

 

There might be fuzzy unstated objectives that have led to that.

 

I wonder if a person was to say, "With XX users, AD starts to have real value" what people would decide on for "XX" - 5 users? 10 users? 15 users? 20 users? 30 users? 50 users?

 

I don't know the answer, but I am a naturally curious person so would people converge to a number or would it be random?

 

Thanks for everyone's patience! I'm pretty knowledgeable in building gaming computers and I go all the way back to Commodore 64. When it comes to Servers though, I am a noob.

 

Turns out I was going about this all wrong. I was creating a new domain on the new server and having all kinds of problems. I had a local IT company come out and the guy spent about 2 hours here. He said the right way to do it is join the new server to the existing domain, promote it, and demote the old server. I can't believe I was so stupid not to think of that. We're all good now. I just have to install Filemaker server and my other apps and I'm golden.

 

I want to thank everyone in this thread who devoted so much time to trying to help me out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!