Recommended Posts

On 6/16/2019 at 1:31 PM, BudMan said:

yeah this system seems a bit over the top if you ask me.. You have 5 users.. Really raid 6 for what amount of data?  How much were those drives?  They are only 1.2TB?  You prob have saved money just getting SDD and doing Raid 1 if you were worried about something failing..

 

The box is prob way over the top cost wise for 5 people... You could prob of gotten by with some $1000 off the shelf nas to be honest... You sure don't need to be paying the MS tax for windows server licenses with 5 users.. Any NAS os would allow you to be a "domain" and central user management, without paying the ms tax..

I get where you're coming from, but the database stuff I have to run is Windows based. I don't think any of it would install on a NAS. I know I went overkill on it probably, but I just decided that I'll pay what I pay and just have enough power for growth.

5 minutes ago, patseguin said:

Here's a question for you guys. Can I keep my current server on the network since it already has my embroidery design database running and just use it solely as an embroidery design database server? I'm wondering if I'll have to change its IP address and demote it from a domain controller. I'm guess I will have to do that. Right now it is 192.168.10.2 which AFAIK is the standard setting for a server. I'll make my new server 192.168.10.2 and just change the old server to to a dynamic IP and connect it to the domain that will be set up on new server. Does this sound like a reasonable plan?

I would plan a migration to get it off of that old unsupported hardware, but you **could** keep it there. 

 

**i wouldn’t recommend it 

 

if it stores info that computers need to get to, it should have a static address. 

4 minutes ago, sc302 said:

I would plan a migration to get it off of that old unsupported hardware, but you **could** keep it there. 

 

**i wouldn’t recommend it 

 

if it stores info that computers need to get to, it should have a static address. 

Good points. I'm just anticipating in advance if there is any compatibility issue with my embroidery database software and Server 2019. If I absolutely have to for now, I'll configure the old server with a NEW static IP and let it be the design file server for now. I'm just not sure what issues I'll have with that server still on the network. I've never demoted a domain controller before.

It is relatively easy. Transfer the fsmo roles over and the global catalog role over.  You can then demote the old one. It isn’t difficult by any means but if you don’t know, you don’t know.  

 

As stated, if you wish, put it on the network and I will take over the rest. 

 

Also do with the FileMaker Pro, install on the new server and copy the db over and see what happens.   The pcs won’t connect (different mappings/odbc) but you can see what breaks before killing the old server completely. 

12 minutes ago, sc302 said:

It is relatively easy. Transfer the fsmo roles over and the global catalog role over.  You can then demote the old one. It isn’t difficult by any means but if you don’t know, you don’t know.  

 

As stated, if you wish, put it on the network and I will take over the rest. 

 

Also do with the FileMaker Pro, install on the new server and copy the db over and see what happens.   The pcs won’t connect (different mappings/odbc) but you can see what breaks before killing the old server completely. 

Have you done server work for me before? I had a cell number for a neowin guy who did some config for me a year or so ago but I replaced that phone and can't find who it was!!

I just looked that filemaker pro will run on windows 10, 8, shoot even 7.. The lastest 17 version... So yeah fire up some 1000 nas, and run windows a VM on it for your filemaker pro.. Zero reason to pay the MS tax any more then you need too.. They don't even say on their site that it will run on windows server versions..  Only workstation versions of windows are actually certified.

6 minutes ago, BudMan said:

I just looked that filemaker pro will run on windows 10, 8, shoot even 7.. The lastest 17 version... So yeah fire up some 1000 nas, and run windows a VM on it for your filemaker pro.. Zero reason to pay the MS tax any more then you need too.. They don't even say on their site that it will run on windows server versions..  Only workstation versions of windows are actually certified.

It's Filemaker Server that hosts the files. In fact, I did some research and it seems that FM Server won't even run on non-server OS's...

4 hours ago, BudMan said:

ah - you just stated filemaker pro ;)

OK here is just the beginning of my problems. Trying to dcpromo and I get a "general error". Any idea what to do?

 

 

 

IMG_0493.jpg

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

6 hours ago, BudMan said:

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

None taken. I am the owner, I was following a tutorial online for setting up active directory. I connected it but I didn't use DHCP. I configured the network adapter with a static IP and configured DNS before I ran dcpromo. Sc302 is on vacation so I decided to try it myself.

7 hours ago, BudMan said:

No offense - but why are you touching this stuff?  Are you the owner of the company?  I say let sc302 in and he can set this stuff up for you.. Other then spending more money than you need to too I don't think you really know anything about this tech stuff ;)

 

Those errors are clear and concise... Did you just connect this new box your network via dhcp and think you could run dcpromo on it to make it a DC?

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

6 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I figured since I've been building and configuring PC's for years, I could configure a "simple" server. I was following this guide: https://www.moderndeployment.com/windows-server-2019-active-directory-installation-beginners-guide/

 

But  ran into that error.

 

Should I try that web based config tool that it offered me to download? I'm not sure if or how I can undo by DNS config, just so I can start all over...

3 hours ago, Fahim S. said:

According to posts early in the thread setting up domain controllers and such stuff is “easy” and a “10 minute job”. 

 

Agree on getting a pro in, even if it is a 10 minute job. Who needs the hassle of doing this?

There is nothing difficult about it and it is easy. It is the over compensating for a click click next process that is difficult. Sometimes you have to go with the flow.   Also reading screens is helpful at times.  I don’t know it has been a long while since I setup an ad controller, not sure if I can remember the process, I may actually have to read the screens to make sure it doesn’t get hosed.  You should also know a dc can’t be a dhcp’d client, it can host dhcp, it doesn’t have to, but it does need a static address...but an error should come up stating that. Making it a member server also makes it a little easier vs trying to go to a dc right out of the box. 

 

Second Out of the box dc really needs dns set up prior, seems to like it much better (less errors) if it has sync’d with the existing ad environment first.  If I remember, it saved the reboot  causing you to add it to the domain prior to promoting. Not really the Microsoft approved way or trained on way for their certification path. 

3 hours ago, sc302 said:

There is nothing difficult about it and it is easy. It is the over compensating for a click click next process that is difficult. Sometimes you have to go with the flow.   Also reading screens is helpful at times.  I don’t know it has been a long while since I setup an ad controller, not sure if I can remember the process, I may actually have to read the screens to make sure it doesn’t get hosed.  You should also know a dc can’t be a dhcp’d client, it can host dhcp, it doesn’t have to, but it does need a static address...but an error should come up stating that. Making it a member server also makes it a little easier vs trying to go to a dc right out of the box. 

 

Second Out of the box dc really needs dns set up prior, seems to like it much better (less errors) if it has sync’d with the existing ad environment first.  If I remember, it saved the reboot  causing you to add it to the domain prior to promoting. Not really the Microsoft approved way or trained on way for their certification path. 

I’m sorry, but the fact that you had to write all of that to explain what you regard as ‘basics’ means that this isn’t ‘simple’ or ‘something that anyone can do’. 

 

I’m not arguing with what the right thing to do is (although I do maintain that I believe setting up a domain for 5 users is overkill and a workgroup would probably be sufficient), but you still have to be an ‘expert’ to do it. 

 

If you go this route, you get a pro to do the work so that it is done properly and not just fumbled through by someone who half (at best) understands the concepts behind what is actually happening. 

There is nothing easy about it. I finally disabled the iDRAC network port and the ethernet #2 port, leaving just 1 ethernet port. After that, AD seemed to install and the server rebooted and now appears to be on the domain that I created. It was easy, I could now just connect my workstations. But, I guess I have to do more Googling and figure out how to configure forward and reverse lookup zones or forests or whatever. I tried connecting to the new domain with my workstation just for giggles but of course that new domain couldn't be found on the network.

1 hour ago, Fahim S. said:

setting up a domain for 5 users is overkill

There is no contorted gymnastics of human imagination for which a 5 user AD makes sense.

 

There might be fuzzy unstated objectives that have led to that.

 

I wonder if a person was to say, "With XX users, AD starts to have real value" what people would decide on for "XX" - 5 users? 10 users? 15 users? 20 users? 30 users? 50 users?

 

I don't know the answer, but I am a naturally curious person so would people converge to a number or would it be random?

 

Thanks for everyone's patience! I'm pretty knowledgeable in building gaming computers and I go all the way back to Commodore 64. When it comes to Servers though, I am a noob.

 

Turns out I was going about this all wrong. I was creating a new domain on the new server and having all kinds of problems. I had a local IT company come out and the guy spent about 2 hours here. He said the right way to do it is join the new server to the existing domain, promote it, and demote the old server. I can't believe I was so stupid not to think of that. We're all good now. I just have to install Filemaker server and my other apps and I'm golden.

 

I want to thank everyone in this thread who devoted so much time to trying to help me out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!