Recommended Posts

I watched the first episode free on YouTube, and thought it was decent, but for a few bits. Closer to the heart of Trek in years, IMHO. The cast is refreshing, especially Anson Mount. I realize he was in some Discovery episodes, but I don't pay much attention to Discovery, My age and health have me being more careful with how I use my time, but I'd give it a 6.5 or 7 out of 10 and a cautious thumbs up.  

On 16/05/2022 at 04:28, nerim said:

I watched the first episode free on YouTube, and thought it was decent, but for a few bits. Closer to the heart of Trek in years, IMHO. The cast is refreshing, especially Anson Mount. I realize he was in some Discovery episodes, but I don't pay much attention to Discovery, My age and health have me being more careful with how I use my time, but I'd give it a 6.5 or 7 out of 10 and a cautious thumbs up.  

You should check out the season with him on Discovery, well worth it IMO.

  • Like 2
On 16/05/2022 at 08:47, Zathras5 said:

You should check out the season with him on Discovery, well worth it IMO.

I did watch one or two episodes of Discovery with him in them, going back to Talos IV I think? It didn't impress me, although he's good. The young lady playing Vina was just awful. 😖 I watched the SNW pilot again, and it's mostly played for laughs, IMHO. 

Episode 3 is out, good one IMO.  There's 2 (kind of 3) different plot threads in play in this episode but it works out.   Now to wait for episode 4, don't know who's going to be the main focus of it yet.  Ep3 was our Una centric episode.

On 19/05/2022 at 19:14, George P said:

Episode 3 is out, good one IMO.  There's 2 (kind of 3) different plot threads in play in this episode but it works out.   Now to wait for episode 4, don't know who's going to be the main focus of it yet.  Ep3 was our Una centric episode.

Spoiler

One thing I noticed when they were down to the surface and some of the bridge crew were able to beam back, the bridge only consisted of women 😂

 

Edited by Steven P.
spoiler tags
On 20/05/2022 at 00:51, Steven P. said:

One thing I noticed when they were down to the surface and some of the bridge crew were able to beam back, the bridge only consisted of women 😂

Spoiler

It shouldn't be a huge shock to see more women on the ship.  It's been stated that back in the TOS era Gene wanted to have a 50/50 split on the show but the network pushed back and the best he could get was something like 60/30 iirc.  

 

Also if you're talking about the scene where Una goes on the bridge it's not all women, there's a two guys there to the left.  It's the same two guys who were in Pikes dinner in ep2, the White red shirt guy and the black yellow shirt dude.  The rest, 5 + Una, were female, yeah.     

 

The away team was mostly guys btw, if you want to keep score.

 

On 20/05/2022 at 00:16, George P said:
  Hide contents

It shouldn't be a huge shock to see more women on the ship.  It's been stated that back in the TOS era Gene wanted to have a 50/50 split on the show but the network pushed back and the best he could get was something like 60/30 iirc.  

 

Also if you're talking about the scene where Una goes on the bridge it's not all women, there's a two guys there to the left.  It's the same two guys who were in Pikes dinner in ep2, the White red shirt guy and the black yellow shirt dude.  The rest, 5 + Una, were female, yeah.     

 

The away team was mostly guys btw, if you want to keep score.

 

Spoiler

Sure, they were there off to the side :) 

 

But this was the shot:

SNAG-0027.png

 

On 20/05/2022 at 01:27, Steven P. said:
  Reveal hidden contents

Sure, they were there off to the side :) 

 

But this was the shot:

SNAG-0027.png

 

Spoiler

Eh, they're just there to fill up the seats, you don't even get names for any except 1.  I bet next episode it'll be another batch of characters.  Next ep is yet another away mission.  

 

On 20/05/2022 at 04:21, dwd999 said:


Well its called Strange New Worlds so yeah, you need to get to them with another away mission. Plus different characters mean lower cost actors which you have to expect when the majority of the budget is sets and CGI effects.

The older shows, TOS/TNG, always shuffled between bridge crew aside from our main 4-5 who are mostly always on the bridge.  TNG would shuffle different helm people, often female, from episode to episode.   The thing that was weird to me, specially in TNG, is how all these no name space filler characters never actually talked.   Not even a "Yes, sir." when given orders.  So damn weird.

On 20/05/2022 at 05:55, George P said:

The older shows, TOS/TNG, always shuffled between bridge crew aside from our main 4-5 who are mostly always on the bridge.  TNG would shuffle different helm people, often female, from episode to episode.   The thing that was weird to me, specially in TNG, is how all these no name space filler characters never actually talked.   Not even a "Yes, sir." when given orders.  So damn weird.

Talking roles get paid more...

*sigh* So much to comment on, so much to rip apart because of all the... just.. *sigh*  And they started off OK too...

 

Spoiler tags time I guess!

 

Spoiler

First we have a virus made of light, that can somehow affect biological systems to such an extent that it makes them seek out more light so that the virus can spread more (a virus's purpose) and can even make them transport planetary core matter onto the ship via a transporter that's been disabled by the ion storm, and later to try to cause a warp core breach that would instantly destroy themselves, the ship AND THE VIRUS, in a flash!  Except we find that Uhura is fine because she "had a nap in a dark pod" which killed off the virus and made it so she can't get reinfected again right afterwards...

 

Then, there's Una.... Aaah, lovely Una... The augment who's immune system is so amazing that it can not only fight off a virus made of light (whut?), and does do by making her internal organs glow (whut?), but can also handily negate lethal doses of radiation (which isn't a disease) in both herself and anyone she happens to be touching (WHUT!?)... How convenient!!!  Never mind that she lied to Starfleet about her heritage and broke dozens of laws in doing so.  Stupid, bigoted, ridiculous laws yes, but still laws.  That's all fine.  Captain Pike will smooth that all over, no worries!

 

Oh, and the colony... Who are apparently so technologically backwards that they store their data in huge and unwieldy cylinders of "light" containing some kind of LCD screen with their journals on them...

 

But on top of this, we have the message that well... The message that it's NOT OK to be "different" in the Star Trek universe!  If you are, you will be shunned and reviled by everyone; made into an outcast because you were born a certain way that you personally had no control over.  It's SO bad, that an entire group decided to alter themselves so drastically as to accidentally kill themselves in an effort to "conform" with what the wider society expects of them, just so they can "belong" (because hanging around bigots is what everyone wants, yeah?).  They try to dress it up with the whole eugenic's wars thing, but at the end of the day, at its very core, we have the fact that being different is bad and that to be accepted, you must conform with the majority.  What kind of dumbassed message is that to be sending people, especially in current times?

 

Star Trek has always prided itself in its claims of "progressiveness", but then, every once in a while, they produce a stinking pile of felgercarb that proves it's anything BUT "progressive".  And it's not just SNW that's guilty of it either.  TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY... They've ALL done the same nonsense as well.  Hell, DS9 is probably the worst culprit of this with Julian Bashir and the other augments who were basically kept in prison for their entire lives just because of their genetic neuro-divergence from societal norms. Only kept around because they can be useful sometimes, but otherwise reviled and kept hidden away from the "normies" instead of being given help so that they can function in society...

 

And then, right at the end and for no obvious reason, we find out it's all the Doctor's fault, because he didn't let the medical transporter be upgraded to filter out stuff like this virus as he was illegally storing his sick kid in the transporter buffer.  Can someone explain why he was doing this on the QT, instead of using his position as CMO to officially have her placed in life preserving transporter suspension?  Pike is a nice guy, he'd have said sure thing... But noooo.... Instead we get that other criminal, Una, handwaving it and just saying we'll get you a separate power supply for her...

 

So, going forward, we now have 2 criminals on the crew who should both be court martialled, and the Doctor absolutely should be in the stockade for endangering the crew.  And a Captain who is.... OK with that.

 

My rating for this episode.  3/10.

 

On 20/05/2022 at 10:54, FloatingFatMan said:

*sigh* So much to comment on, so much to rip apart because of all the... just.. *sigh*  And they started off OK too...

 

Spoiler tags time I guess!

 

  Hide contents

First we have a virus made of light, that can somehow affect biological systems to such an extent that it makes them seek out more light so that the virus can spread more (a virus's purpose) and can even make them transport planetary core matter onto the ship via a transporter that's been disabled by the ion storm, and later to try to cause a warp core breach that would instantly destroy themselves, the ship AND THE VIRUS, in a flash!  Except we find that Uhura is fine because she "had a nap in a dark pod" which killed off the virus and made it so she can't get reinfected again right afterwards...

 

Then, there's Una.... Aaah, lovely Una... The augment who's immune system is so amazing that it can not only fight off a virus made of light (whut?), and does do by making her internal organs glow (whut?), but can also handily negate lethal doses of radiation (which isn't a disease) in both herself and anyone she happens to be touching (WHUT!?)... How convenient!!!  Never mind that she lied to Starfleet about her heritage and broke dozens of laws in doing so.  Stupid, bigoted, ridiculous laws yes, but still laws.  That's all fine.  Captain Pike will smooth that all over, no worries!

 

Oh, and the colony... Who are apparently so technologically backwards that they store their data in huge and unwieldy cylinders of "light" containing some kind of LCD screen with their journals on them...

 

But on top of this, we have the message that well... The message that it's NOT OK to be "different" in the Star Trek universe!  If you are, you will be shunned and reviled by everyone; made into an outcast because you were born a certain way that you personally had no control over.  It's SO bad, that an entire group decided to alter themselves so drastically as to accidentally kill themselves in an effort to "conform" with what the wider society expects of them, just so they can "belong" (because hanging around bigots is what everyone wants, yeah?).  They try to dress it up with the whole eugenic's wars thing, but at the end of the day, at its very core, we have the fact that being different is bad and that to be accepted, you must conform with the majority.  What kind of dumbassed message is that to be sending people, especially in current times?

 

Star Trek has always prided itself in its claims of "progressiveness", but then, every once in a while, they produce a stinking pile of felgercarb that proves it's anything BUT "progressive".  And it's not just SNW that's guilty of it either.  TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY... They've ALL done the same nonsense as well.  Hell, DS9 is probably the worst culprit of this with Julian Bashir and the other augments who were basically kept in prison for their entire lives just because of their genetic neuro-divergence from societal norms. Only kept around because they can be useful sometimes, but otherwise reviled and kept hidden away from the "normies" instead of being given help so that they can function in society...

 

And then, right at the end and for no obvious reason, we find out it's all the Doctor's fault, because he didn't let the medical transporter be upgraded to filter out stuff like this virus as he was illegally storing his sick kid in the transporter buffer.  Can someone explain why he was doing this on the QT, instead of using his position as CMO to officially have her placed in life preserving transporter suspension?  Pike is a nice guy, he'd have said sure thing... But noooo.... Instead we get that other criminal, Una, handwaving it and just saying we'll get you a separate power supply for her...

 

So, going forward, we now have 2 criminals on the crew who should both be court martialled, and the Doctor absolutely should be in the stockade for endangering the crew.  And a Captain who is.... OK with that.

 

My rating for this episode.  3/10.

 

Spoiler

A virus moving around using light out of all the whacky stuff in close to 60 years of Trek seems weird to you all of a sudden?  A series that's known for just pulling crazy out of thin air and trying to mask it with technobable, come on.      The Ion storm doesn't cover the whole planet either, so Hemmer could have just as easily been using it to beam from a part of the planet were the storm wasn't having a effect, or, because he was also struggling to get it to transport to begin with, the storm still had some effect but it doesn't matter because you're not trying to beam up living people but molten rock.     Uhura not being effected tracks, but we never see her again after that initial interaction with Una, and they never say she can't get re-infected, I'll give you that they skim over that possibility in the rush of everything else.

 

Una glowing was just a fancy FX way to show her augmented immune system "burning" the infection out, which is what your body does, thus why people get high temps when sick.    Besides, we have next to nothing canon wise about Ilyrians and their systems, it's a clean slate to write on, lethal doses of radiation for them could be totally different, or their system can correct the damage to their cells.  Fact is you can come up with any whacky thing for them because there's nothing set in stone (till now) outside of that one lone episode of Enterprise back in season 3 iirc.

 

And as far as Pike not caring, this is the era of cowboy diplomacy, captains were acting fast and loose with regulations.   We've went over it time and again how often they break the rules and the prime directive.  Not turning Una and the Doctor in seems pretty minor in comparison if you want to get picky with it.  

 

I can ignore all the little plot points; they're not the end of the episode by any means, just annoying. But what I cannot ignore is the main thrust of my post... The underlying message sent by the episode as a whole.  Earlier Trek did not-dissimilar things it's true, but they did it AFTER already being long established and SNW doesn't have that luxury.  Quite the opposite in fact.

On 20/05/2022 at 11:35, FloatingFatMan said:

I can ignore all the little plot points; they're not the end of the episode by any means, just annoying. But what I cannot ignore is the main thrust of my post... The underlying message sent by the episode as a whole.  Earlier Trek did not-dissimilar things it's true, but they did it AFTER already being long established and SNW doesn't have that luxury.  Quite the opposite in fact.

Spoiler

The message in the episode, aside from the stuff about bigotry which has always been in Trek, is multiple ones IMO. What I took away first is what Una said at the end in her log entry about others excusing things because you happen to be one of the "good ones" or a hero.  It makes you take note because it's something that happens irl actually.  One mans monster is another mans hero, or the old version that says one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.     The other bit about not prejudging someone has always been in Trek so that's not new.    You say the message is about not being different to the pre-established "normal" but I didn't get that overall.  To me Pike not caring about it and pointing out that she's the best first officer in the fleet goes counter to that message and if anything points to the idea of having and enforcing outdated rules/laws that even to this day you still find going on in the real world as being what's in the wrong here.   It's weird, and probably done on purpose by the different writers between the different shows, that how you always run into some high ranking admiral in star fleet, or group, who so clearly hates or wants to get rid of some "enemy" of the Federation.  I figure it's done so that our main characters/captain can stand up to them and take the moral high ground.  

 

Makes you wonder how they got put in charge though.   It's the whole bases for the plot of ST6 for one thing.  

 

 

 

On 20/05/2022 at 10:17, George P said:
  Hide contents
Spoiler

The message in the episode, aside from the stuff about bigotry which has always been in Trek, is multiple ones IMO. What I took away first is what Una said at the end in her log entry about others excusing things because you happen to be one of the "good ones" or a hero.  It makes you take note because it's something that happens irl actually.  One mans monster is another mans hero, or the old version that says one mans terrorist is another mans freedom figh

ter.     The other bit about not prejudging someone has always been in Trek so that's not new.    You say the message is about not being different to the pre-established "normal" but I didn't get that overall.  To me Pike not caring about it and pointing out that she's the best first officer in the fleet goes counter to that message and if anything points to the idea of having and enforcing outdated rules/laws that even to this day you still find going on in the real world as being what's in the wrong here.   It's weird, and probably done on purpose by the different writers between the different shows, that how you always run into some high ranking admiral in star fleet, or group, who so clearly hates or wants to get rid of some "enemy" of the Federation.  I figure it's done so that our main characters/captain can stand up to them and take the moral high ground.  

 

Makes you wonder how they got put in charge though.   It's the whole bases for the plot of ST6 for one thing.  

 

 

 

 

Spoiler

Individuals can be better sure, but the problem is the society and how its portrayed.  We see that with La'an, and how she was treated by her peers as a child.  Vilified and hated because even though she's not actually enhanced, she's Khan's descendent and therefore, an augment anyway.  It's so bad that she attacks Una once she learns she IS an augment, and as someone who's been on the receiving end of that kind of hatred in childhood back in the 70's/80's, I can tell you that such treatment only happens when society itself doesn't care about stopping it.

 

So, as for wondering how bigoted individuals get put in charge... Well, that happens when society either approves, or just doesn't care.

 

On 20/05/2022 at 12:30, FloatingFatMan said:

 

  Hide contents

Individuals can be better sure, but the problem is the society and how its portrayed.  We see that with La'an, and how she was treated by her peers as a child.  Vilified and hated because even though she's not actually enhanced, she's Khan's descendent and therefore, an augment anyway.  It's so bad that she attacks Una once she learns she IS an augment, and as someone who's been on the receiving end of that kind of hatred in childhood back in the 70's/80's, I can tell you that such treatment only happens when society itself doesn't care about stopping it.

 

So, as for wondering how bigoted individuals get put in charge... Well, that happens when society either approves, or just doesn't care.

 

Spoiler

I've had my own experiences growing up so I can relate but that started to go away almost completely by High School when people are older and you hope have more common sense and aren't as stupid.   As far as before then, well, kids are evil, nothing new.  Even if society doesn't hate you that's adult rules and kids don't know.   Bullying still being around even in the 23rd and 24th century wouldn't surprise me.   

 

I think the La'an making it into starfleet even with her lineage is something positive.    Anyway, the ban on genetic manipulation is canon so we can't exactly side step it though we can still face it/bring it up.    I think the writers took the chance to build on Unas character, using beta canon as reference, so I give them credit for that and giving us some more lore about Illyrians.  

 

Wife and I finally caught up on all three episodes and loving it so far as-well-as the characters; nurse Chappel gives me a "mad scientist" vibe 😛

 

The details in the ship's interior are spectacular and I'm glad they didn't go with the brewery for engineering ;)

Episode 4 has dropped, just seen it.   

 

Spoiler

It's got a mix of Arena (minus the epic Kirk hand to hand combat), and some ST2 + Balance of Terror vibes going.  

 

On 26/05/2022 at 21:44, techbeck said:

Didn't like how preachy last episode got compared to current events.  Hopefully next episodes tone it down. I watch too escape the day to day not to be reminded of it. 

Yeah a TOS episode wouldn't have

Spoiler

centered around a remembrance day I don't think. And I don't recall any of Trek using pins for remembrance days. I can only think of Captains Day as an event on the Enterprise D for kids.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!