Firefox 0.8


Recommended Posts

Porting Pinstripe would be hard because it uses the OS resources to form a GUI :/

I don't think it will be that much of a problem. Apart from the captionbar you can port it 1:1 probably.

I'm gonna take a look tonight on how to skin Firefox. If I figure it out I'll make the theme myself.

Do you mean how IE sorts?

Yep, firebird errr firefox's way is kinda counter-intuitive for me.

Overall it still whoops Ie's butt but I sorely miss that one feature.

I bet if I manually edited the bookmark file I could get it though I'll play around with it tonight.

I just love the .8 release, and the name's ok ;)

But i would want those sigs that someone said you could get from

the website, with the name, a logo and some text, do you get it? :blush:

Thanks

Are you talking about this? http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html

ooookaaaaaay.... firefox apparently doesn't believe in SCROLLBARS!!!!! where'd mine go!?!?!??! (sad face)

EDIT: i'm back to using firebird again....

I almost don't want to help you for lack of sympathy for your naivete, but if you use All in One Gestures or any kind of extensions, wipe out your profile and start anew.

This is still a beta client until it hits 1.0, so you must delete your profile everytime a major release comes out or the browser will not function correctly.

I almost don't want to help you for lack of sympathy for your naivete, but if you use All in One Gestures or any kind of extensions, wipe out your profile and start anew.

This is still a beta client until it hits 1.0, so you must delete your profile everytime a major release comes out or the browser will not function correctly.

yes i had this in mind... i intended for my comment to be humorous.. i guess i forgot the proper emoticon. thanks for that little bit of sympathy by the way :happy:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!