Recommended Posts

On 14/07/2022 at 15:15, primortal said:

And yet just like Hunters laptop, no one can confirm any of this.  You guys just soak up this 💩 without engaging any brain cells.  Just like when you all lost it when you were told that Hilary had a pedophile ring in the basement of a pizzeria that didn't even have a basement.

 

281054471_367842718707004_8477803968027618172_n.thumb.jpg.e6b99bf357c0d9fb812e39487b767c2c.jpg

 

Would you like to do an IQ test together and find out which one of us lack brain cells?

  • Facepalm 1
  • Haha 2
On 14/07/2022 at 20:21, Yorak said:

Would you like to do an IQ test together and find out which one of us lack brain cells?

The fact you cite IQ as a realistic measure of intelligence in 2022 really shows about how well you'd do. We used to make that argument as kids - grow up.  Oh man, now you'll be thinking about kids again...

On 14/07/2022 at 15:08, Dick Montage said:

You seem obsessed with the idea of showing with children in a sexual way!

 

"Tell me more"?  That's utterly creepy!

Nice try, little fella. I want to hear an adult male try to explain to me why it is okay to shower with a child that is old enough to remember it.

On 14/07/2022 at 15:19, shockz said:

 

You literally are following the deflection playbook to a T. Pathetic. 

What am I trying to deflect, in your opinion?

On 14/07/2022 at 15:22, Dick Montage said:

The fact you cite IQ as a realistic measure of intelligence in 2022 really shows about how well you'd do. We used to make that argument as kids - grow up.  Oh man, now you'll be thinking about kids again...

Oh, is it not? Should I cite my job position, then? What other ways shall we compare? I wasn't the one that brought up brain cells. I was responding to someone that did. See how that works?

On 14/07/2022 at 20:24, Yorak said:

Oh, is it not? Should I cite my job position, then? What other ways shall we compare? I wasn't the one that brought up brain cells. I was responding to someone that did. See how that works?

Oh we got a tough guy here!  Has a job title and a high IQ!  Must obviously be smarter than the rest of us.  One clever pervert indeed.

On 14/07/2022 at 15:24, Dick Montage said:

I bey you do - pervert!

Oh, I see how this works. I call Joe a pedophile, someone says they also shower with their kids, then I get called a pervert. That seems intelligent. That is very typical of the left though. They often call conservatives racist when democrats are far more racist. Do you have any intelligent response? Hell, I'll take a canned one that was spoon fed by liberal media.

On 14/07/2022 at 15:25, Dick Montage said:

Oh we got a tough guy here!  Has a job title and a high IQ!  Must obviously be smarter than the rest of us.  One clever pervert indeed.

I'm sorry your job at McDonald's isn't working out for you. Hey, the world needs these menial jobs.

On 14/07/2022 at 15:21, Yorak said:

Would you like to do an IQ test together and find out which one of us lack brain cells?

“Never have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.” ― Mark Twain

  • Like 3
On 14/07/2022 at 14:23, Yorak said:

Nice try, little fella. I want to hear an adult male try to explain to me why it is okay to shower with a child that is old enough to remember it.

What am I trying to deflect, in your opinion?

Try as hard as you can, but you still have nothing.  More desperation from the feckless crowd.  

 

Best to ignore this one.  He pops in throws around some nonsense and then leaves.  No substance, facts or objectivity; only rumor, baseless claims and well-trodden conservative disinformation.

  • Like 3
On 14/07/2022 at 20:24, Yorak said:

Oh, is it not? Should I cite my job position, then? What other ways shall we compare? I wasn't the one that brought up brain cells. I was responding to someone that did. See how that works?

What are you, 5?  "I'm better than you are! Neener neener neener!!" :rolleyes: 

On 14/07/2022 at 13:48, FloatingFatMan said:

NO, because that lets you get away with spreading filthy and disgusting lies that could utterly destroy Biden's entire LIFE.  How'd you like it if we started something like that against YOU?

 

You're despicable.

The most I Implied was that he was sniffing her hair, never once did I drop the P word. He's physically touchy feely around children and women, this isn't a lie, it's record on numerous occasions.

 

Trump was recorded verbally saying that he likes to grab women by the p**ssy

Biden is record physically getting into children and women's personal spaces, putting his hands on their waist & shoulder, petting their face with both hands, running his hands through their hair, not something that would typically be considered normal.

 

Most of the people appear uncomfortable as he does so. He was also recorded saying that children liked to run their hand down his leg, like who says stuff like that, especially at a podium with a microphone while being recorded.

  • Facepalm 2

Just so we are clear... pedophilia, sexual abuse on any side of the isle is disgusting and these people should spend life behind bars. The rate of recidivism in pedophiles is higher than any other type of offender, and I do not believe they should see the light of day. They cannot be rehabilitated. Statistically some can, but I'd rather not have society take that risk. Secondly, my point still stands that pedophilia is more prevalent on the left than on the right. Nobody has been able to disprove that yet. I'm looking at numbers alone. I'm aware the right also has our share of disgusting people, though. I never give my side a free pass for anything, especially the aforementioned evil acts. Even when Trump was in office, I commented frequently to friends and family about his rhetoric. Sometimes funny, but distracting, unnecessary and sometimes incorrect. If anything, I am tougher on the right than the left because I am tired of people that don't.

Edit: Typo... hovering over my work keyboard to type on mine.

On 14/07/2022 at 16:00, warwagon said:

Trump was recorded verbally saying that he likes to grab women by the p**ssy

Biden is record physically getting into children and women's personal spaces, putting his hand on their shoulder, petting their face with both hands, running his hands through their hair, not something that would typically be considered normal.

The difference is that Trump was caught on a hot mic actually admitting to sexually assaulting women and 26+ has come forward to that.  Biden, nothing but doctored/out of context videos and photos claiming what you stated and that you're more upset with the false narrative that Biden was invading personal spaces of women/children then a man actually admitting to sexually assaulting women.

  • Like 3
On 14/07/2022 at 15:24, primortal said:

They'll be starting up the Hunter Laptop saga soon enough.  The "let's look for Biden 'sniffing' girls again" is just to hold them over till then.

They already are, since about sunday/monday, just before the latest hearing.. 

Can we all at least agree that both have had some creepy moments ? Just put that to bed. It's not like there arent others on both sides of the aisle in Congress that have done creepy things both old and young . 

 

Moving on now....

On 14/07/2022 at 16:38, Yorak said:

Quoting the federalist... LOL... what next? StormFront?

On 14/07/2022 at 16:41, Yorak said:

 

Starting to think conservatism is a mental illness. I think they make special busses for people that post and or make these.

  • Like 3
On 14/07/2022 at 16:27, wakjak said:

Quoting the federalist... LOL... what next? StormFront?

You don't have to trust The Federalist if you don't want to. Feel free to fact-check what the article said, and post here with any rebuttals you may have. 😉

On 14/07/2022 at 17:30, Yorak said:

You don't have to trust The Federalist if you don't want to. Feel free to fact-check what the article said, and post here with any rebuttals you may have. 😉

Nah, just being the federalist is all I need, nothing with the word fact comes from that website. Thanks for playing. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!