• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I was planning on making a "Create a hard disk image" wizard.? "Easy so a child can use it" means everything is right there for the user to do :-P.

What is your app written in?? Sharing the source would be cool :-).

It's written in python ..

I am going to release the source as soon as I get done testing the HD image that I made ..

( also cleaning out the code now.. its quite dirt:):) )

  • 0
Very cool .. cant wait to try your app out...

Heres a question for ya .. what are you doing for empty HD images ?

Are you just asking the user to give the path for the HD image or your app makes the HD image for them ?

Coz I just made this app using the python script from main pearpc site.

Try it out and let me know what u think .. It works pretty good .. you just need one click and it will make a HD image for ya :) (the image file will be saved in the same folder of the program)

Heres a SS and link for the program.

http://s87840517.onlinehome.us/utils/hdimagemaker.rar

Do you have a guide for expanding the size of your HD image from within OS X? I know it can be done but don't want to do it until I know how for sure.

  • 0
Do you have a guide for expanding the size of your HD image from within OS X? I know it can be done but don't want to do it until I know how for sure.

I've already posted a complete step-by-step procedure for this ;-).

Increasing Your PearPC Hard Disk Image Size

  • 0
Do you have a guide for expanding the size of your HD image from within OS X? I know it can be done but don't want to do it until I know how for sure.

well you could just make a bigger HD image ( using my app ofcourse :p ) ..mount it as a slave drive ..

then use corbon copy cloner and clone your existing HD to that empty HD. When you are done ..just boot pearpc using that new HD image and delete the old one.

Link for corbon copy cloner

http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html

EDIT: darn .. gotta type faster than Tekmaven :D

  • 0
It's now running well. I'm going to be writing some wizards, and other things to make this app "user friendly". My goal: a 4 year old should be able to use PearPC. The ugly dos console with the debug information is now in the "Session Log" area of the VM's page. I currently can't embed the PearPC GUI window in my application due to the way PearPC works :-P (I'm going to send the dev's an email, hopefully we can work on this).

Here is the latest screenie, and I'm also going to put this on the PearPC Developer's Wiki.

wow that's looking great

  • 0

Good news is coming...

Enhanced PearPC 0.2pre

A new enhanced build of PearPC has been programmed by nilss. The new main feature is SDL support, which gives you nice speed enhancement.

According to the developer, his build only needs 2 mins 20 secs, compared to 2 mins 55 secs with the CVS build on his 1 GHz CPU. So it's 35 seconds faster than the normal version.

Full list of the new features and advantages:

SDL: Faster!

SDL: Different video targets (like directfb, x11, and aalib)

Fullscreen toggle (F12)

Mousegrab (SHIFT+ F9)

Change redraw timings on the fly (F10 -1msec; F11 +1msec)

Right now it is only available as source, but I am sure binaries will pop up soon. You can tell me of course, if you know where to find one.

nilss is available via our chat room and in the forums.

Pearpc.net

  • 0

Hey all, I'm having trouble installing Panther. I've tried about 5 times now, and each time, it has failed. I have tried using JITC and non-JITC builds, (0.2pre), among various other nightly builds (P4 optimised & No-Arch-Win32-R2). I am able to start the installation however it fails after a few hours, seen in the attached screen. I've played around with 128, 256 and higher (up to 512MB) of ram in my config, changed resolutions, redraw rates, installed openVPN, disabled NICs (both the old one and the new realtek one in the config), used different 3GB and 6GB images (at different locations, on different drives), everything!

What I need to ask:

- which build should I use on a P4, because the nightly builds don't work for me?

- which pre-formatted images is everyone using? filenames?

- any other information.

Not sure what else is there to do, to get this thing working. :huh:

post-12-1085996536.jpg

  • 0
Good news is coming...

Enhanced PearPC 0.2pre

Can someone please help me compile this in Cygwin? For some reason, the compiler does not see "install-sh" but it is clearly sitting in the folder.

I unpacked the tarball -- within Cygwin itself -- using "tar -xvzf pearpc-0.2.tar.bz2" . The files appear to be there, but according to Windows they are "shortcuts" -- links that actually point somewhere else.

Why are these files "missing" ?

I know this a pretty ridiculous question at this point but I feel like asking it anyway.

Is it or will it eventually be possible to get an iPod to work with iTunes using Pear PC?

First, Firewire has to actually be emulated in the operating system. Right now, the only external connection is "USB" but it can't do anything. Firewire is probably a ways off. Once Firewire works inside the Virtual Mac, it must then be connected to the host computer's ieee1394 interface.

Edited by eaglebtc
  • 0
Thanx for the fast reply....I'm going to cry and wait till a faster version is out...

I doubt it will EVER be fast enough for your laptop. Straight x86 processor emulation isn't at a 1:1 speed to your processor... so emulating a different architecture, will always be a slower (I'd be suprised if we got it to 1/10 of the x86 processor speed).

Currently many PearPC functions are all handled on the processor. As PearPC progresses, functions such as the video display will be utilizing the graphics card; taking away much needed processing time. A 350mhz laptop can by no means have even a crappy video card for today's standards (it would be "sub-crappy" :-P). Also, your disk interface is probably ATA33 (or even slower), and coupled with the slow processor, 33mb/s max burst of HD transfer is pretty poor!

I don't want to dash your hopes and dreams :-P, just want to tell you that you might wait a lifetime :no:

  • 0
I doubt it will EVER be fast enough for your laptop. Straight x86 processor emulation isn't at a 1:1 speed to your processor... so emulating a different architecture, will always be a slower (I'd be suprised if we got it to 1/10 of the x86 processor speed).

Currently many PearPC functions are all handled on the processor. As PearPC progresses, functions such as the video display will be utilizing the graphics card; taking away much needed processing time. A 350mhz laptop can by no means have even a crappy video card for today's standards (it would be "sub-crappy" :-P). Also, your disk interface is probably ATA33 (or even slower), and coupled with the slow processor, 33mb/s max burst of HD transfer is pretty poor!

I don't want to dash your hopes and dreams :-P, just want to tell you that you might wait a lifetime :no:

Whoauw, thanx alot for your epxlanation bro! Oh well, that means i got to stick with Bassilik or whatever

Again, thanx alot!

Peace,

Alberto

  • 0
Whoauw, thanx alot for your epxlanation bro! Oh well, that means i got to stick with Bassilik or whatever

Again, thanx alot!

Peace,

Alberto

Stick a nice Linux distro on your laptop, it looks nicer than Windows and is more responsive in my experience.

  • 0

How fast would OSX run using PPC on my machine, specs below? Would it be comprable to a PII, PIII, running Windows XP?

Also, I know this has been asked before, and I think the answer is yes but, can I allocate 512MB od memory towards the config? Will this help performance? Is there any reason not to?

  • 0
How fast would OSX run using PPC on my machine, specs below? Would it be comprable to a PII, PIII, running Windows XP?

Also, I know this has been asked before, and I think the answer is yes but, can I allocate 512MB od memory towards the config? Will this help performance? Is there any reason not to?

It should run quite well on your machine.

I believe you can give it 512 MB RAM without any trouble, you just have to figure out the config files first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!