Was the moon landing faked ? I think so


Recommended Posts

my only question is how did they get off the moon?????

i'm not very good with physics but anyone can see the difference between the apollo rocket and the moon lander. how could the moon lander carry enough fuel to blast off the moon surface? i know the gravitational pull is about 1/6 G so it wasn't that weak.

lol on man... head out of the sand... c'mon. you have no place to speak b/c youve never researched anything on conspiracies... you hear the word 'conspiracy' and your conditioned, brainwashed head triggers you to react this way. in fact, if you research ANYTHING on the moon landing you'll know that things dont make sense at all.

1. fact is Kennedy promised something we couldnt do in that time limit.

2. we had to beat the russians in something cause they beat us w/ everything else.

3. why hasnt the russians EVER tried to go to the moon?

4. why hasnt the US tried to go back since then?

5. why are all the pictures from the moon so perfect looking? they had a camera mounted on their chest w/ no view finder... they may as well be shooting blind... impossible to get these perfect "patriotic" shots

6. why are there shadows going in different directions if there's only one light source?

7. in a picture of an astronaut coming off the lander... he's clearly in a shadow of the lander but you can see his entire body.

8. of over 12000+ shots taken on all the moon missions, why do citizens only know of a few dozen?

9. some shots it's clear to see an astronauts antenaa appear and disappear... on the same mission.

10. in the "america is great" shot of neil armstrong posing on the moon... it's clear that the sun is behind him and yet you can see his body perfectly illuminated and even see the reflection in his visor! impossible.

11. if they were outside the van allen radiation belt how in the world did they survive the sun's radiation? it would take 4 feet of iron to protect them... their ship didnt have it... and their suits certainly didnt have any iron in them...

12. need i go on?

<yawn>

should I even start...

dude...are you a scientist? Do you work for NASA? I doubt it. Therefore what you THINK you know, you don't.

Also, why would we fake the landing?

bycause the cold was started..

and the russians where the first in space.

the Americans would not stayed behind of that.

I do not know if it real or not.

for that you must see that for your self on the moon.

o well, it happend for i was being borned.

@ Hummer.

mine friends did not say anything about it. ;)

This yet another example of how we are daily manipulated by our rulers.

I think this so caled 'moon landing' was actaully a Hollywood movie production.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/3543/moonfake.htm

What is, isn't and what isn't, is

Tell us what you think.

Some other cover-ups are exposed here:

http://cpscrimes.tripod.com/infowars.htm

...

now you people stop calling each other morons and strain your brain a little: how in hell was US able to go from the very first 1-spin flight of Gagarin in 1961 to A FREAKIN' LANDIN ON THE MOON what...only 8 years later? what that time's technology? BULL! how long has it taken them NOW to send a stupid rover on Mars?! how many of them have they crashed?! You go ask any NASA guy now how long it would take to set the same expedition NOW, with TODAY's technology? Get some criticism and thinking applied here and stop reading your dumb school history book, because every one of them, in every country is filled with propaganda. and if you haven't realized that yet, then it's time since you are making statements llike that. fugly.

P.S. f***en gullable kids...

Edited by wicker_man
now you people stop calling each other morons and strain your brain a little: how in hell was US able to go from the very first 1-spin flight of Gagarin in 1961 to A FREAKIN' LANDIN ON THE MOON what...only 8 years later? what that time's technology? BULL! how long has it taken them NOW to send a stupid rover on Mars?! how many of them have they crashed?! You go ask any NASA guy now how long it would take to set the same expedition NOW, with TODAY's technology? Get some criticism and thinking applied here and stop reading your dumb school history book, because every one of them, in every country is filled with propaganda. and if you haven't realized that yet, then it's time since you are making statements llike that. fugly.

P.S. f***en gullable kids...

here's the bitterness issue again.

We landed on the moon. I'll ask you, are YOU a scientist?

If people think this is fake and there are a lot of people who think NASA as a ploy to beat the space race campaign... trumped this up

We have the most powerful telescope in the world up in space the Hubble telescope why don't NASA point this to the Moon and show the looner landing pod is till on the Moon this will rid all suspicions forever and prove beyond reasonable doubt it was no fake...

:sleep:

We have the most powerful telescope in the world up in space the Hubble telescope why don't NASA point this to the Moon and show the looner landing pod is till on the Moon this will rid all suspicions forever and prove beyond reasonable doubt it was no fake...

Because there is no need to. We landed on it not once, but around 6-7 times. ( could be wrong, but it wasn't just once...)

  • 2 weeks later...

Conspiracy theorists... A conspiracy doesn't mean things are fake, it means a group of people, believe different of certain events, especially different from what is forcefully told to the world by people of power.

I believe this theory, but it's not really a theory anymore due to the fact all the evidence that proves the U.S. to have landed on the moon, also proves that the landing is fake. There was a show on FOX about this, and the evidence, wow, the evidence, there's no evidence to prove this story wrong, and you'd know why if you even tried to prove it wrong. All the evidence, or all fact on the events, show that it is all lies, all faked, and this story is most likely true.

At first, I didn't really believe it, but then i downloaded TV show that was on FOX, that was about this, and all the evidence presented, was unfunkenbelievable. C'mon are you guys that stupid to notice the damn shadows? C'mon you guys are a bunch of losers, especially you boogmasterdan, get a life already and stop worrying about your post counts. All of you guys that disagree obviously are just morons, and idiots. You need to learn to research and stop having soo much pride in things. Cuz the pride is blinding you from reaching for any truth.

Oh yah, My theory of the world trade center stuff, it's all true. 8D peace out.

hmmm, i was one of the people how saw the fox documentary and did consider it highly likely that the moon landings were faked.

however, i saw a program on channel 5 (uk) about it and it did experiments with stuff like shadows with only 1 light source, and about if you only have one light source, everything in shadow is completely invisable is completely invisable and totally debunked all the conspiracy theories by showing different angles of shadows is possible due to the gradient of the surface and how light reflects off the surfact of the moon.

another point that conspiracy theorists tend to forget is the moon rock which was brought back and given out to labs across the globe, surely if this was of terrestrial origin, someone would have 'spilled the beans'...

also, there are labs in the US which use lasers which reflect off objects which were put on the moon as part of experiments which are used to accurate locate earths position in relation to the moon and the rest of the solar system.

there are what appear to be inconsistencies with the evidence portrayed in some circumstances, such as the so called "stage props" with markings on, i think that nasa maybe did shoot some stuff back on earth for propoganda purposes, remember the political climate was cold war era.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!