Was the moon landing faked ? I think so


Recommended Posts

the only argument for it being fake, and i mean only, is the amount of radiation they'd be exposed to. and well, they have suits for that kind of thing

Did you see the kinds of suits they wore? It was like having a thin layer of tin foil over you. I've seen pictures of their "space suits" and seen documentaries with scientists literally laughing about the fact that if these astronauts had gone through a radiation belt, with those suits on, they would have died instantaneously.

P.S. The russians still say it is impossible even today. Why not do it again? Anyone???

I am a believer that it was faked. If anyone has ever watched that one video that was on like ABC or NBC or whatever awhile ago, I believe what was documented on that video. Just what they explained and into detail too, just makes me think it was fake. It is one of those things that will probably never be revealed as being faked, but oh man, I would love to be alive that day if it ever happens :p

To non believers, it is your own opinion to believe it or not, if someone can provide the video, unless it has been mentioned in this thread, I recommend if you have time to spear to watch this, that you do. Or of course, just go read websites online as I see many links in here anyhow.

I think it still happened. I saw the "documentary" on the conspiracy and had doubts, but then I also looked at the replies given after (like the site soppychunk refers to) and came to the conclusion that it really did happen.

Of course, it was the Cold War, and there could have been other staged stuff to drive the point home (as mentioned by nealwainwright) BUT I still believe man landed on the moon.

As for doing it again, well when there is economic incentive to do it, it will happen again. NASA for now would rather focus on Mars and other projects.

I know, it seems this topic comes back from time to time :)

It seems some people can't accept that humans could go to the moon.

It is not that they can't, just in 1969, I do not think we did. And I only had replied since I saw it was recently replied to today, that is all.

You are nothing but a bunch of liberal democrats.

(LOL!)

If people think this is fake and there are a lot of people who think NASA as a ploy to beat the space race campaign... trumped this up

We have the most powerful telescope in the world up in space the Hubble telescope why don't NASA point this to the Moon and show the looner landing pod is till on the Moon this will rid all suspicions forever and prove beyond reasonable doubt it was no fake...

Funny thing I heard a while back....While Republicans believe that they are right, Democrats toy with the idea they may be wrong. I would rather give it a chance than to later be known as ignorant.

(Bush-WMD)

And I agree if the landing pod is in fact still there please put an end to all the conspiracies and take a picture, the only reason I can tell that is good enough for why they have not is perhaps there is no picture to take.

I am not sure if it is true or not but I will not simply ignore what seems to be valid arguments.

"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." - Euripides

This yet another example of how we are daily manipulated by our rulers.

I think this so caled 'moon landing' was actaully a Hollywood movie production.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/3543/moonfake.htm

What is, isn't and what isn't, is

Tell us what you think.

Some other cover-ups are exposed here:

http://cpscrimes.tripod.com/infowars.htm

hon, it was real...i was there. the moon is covered in green cheese and there are little moonmen wearing tutus running around. the martians use the moon as a weekend getaway. there is a colony of venusians on the dark side. a joint exploration team made up of martians and moonmen recently left to colonize pluto.

get over it

And I agree if the landing pod is in fact still there please put an end to all the conspiracies and take a picture, the only reason I can tell that is good enough for why they have not is perhaps there is no picture to take.

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

Good Excuse.

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

True, although it is getting increasingly harder to fake photos being so many experts in the field, even for NASA.

I would suspect that some people, like you say, would just keep on thinking what they have and just say it is a fake. But for others it might change their mind.....It is not an all or nothing request, even if it was proven to not be a fake some would still not believe....some defence on NASA's part is all people are asking. But since they haven't one starts to wonder why?

foto's or video's proofs nothing.

in this time is the technisian so good, that they can you everything believe what they want.

even 'your' own eyes can see something that isn't true/there.

back to optic: i do not know, i wasn't even on earth when this happend.

I"ve never been to the moon therefore the moon doesn't even exist. Its just a colossus mind control satellite placed in orbit by the US and European governments to make us believe we landed on it and believe all the other conspiracies!...

GO ME I'M DEFYING THE GOVERNMENT..

pfft ;)

The Moon Landing was real for the simple facts that are:

a) Faking it would just be stupid, it would obviiousely come out one day.

b) The USSR never called us on it. They had the technology to know wether or not we went and I guarantee you they were watching in 1969. Believe you me if we didn't go they would have been the first ones to call us on it.

c) They have pieces of the moon back on earth.

d) You're all gullible because you question everything, even the obviousely true, in your blind quest to make yourself unignorent, but while doing so refuse to believe even the obviousely true. You're like the opposite of a lemming. Imagine a bunch of Lemmings telling you not to try and play with a lion, but you, not believing them because after all they're lemmings, decide to go against the majority and play with the lion and get eaten. That's what this reminds me of.

The Moon Landing was real for the simple facts that are:

a) Faking it would just be stupid, it would obviiousely come out one day.

b) The USSR never called us on it. They had the technology to know wether or not we went and I guarantee you they were watching in 1969. Believe you me if we didn't go they would have been the first ones to call us on it.

c) They have pieces of the moon back on earth.

d) You're all gullible because you question everything, even the obviousely true, in your blind quest to make yourself unignorent, but while doing so refuse to believe even the obviousely true. You're like the opposite of a lemming. Imagine a bunch of Lemmings telling you not to try and play with a lion, but you, not believing them because after all they're lemmings, decide to go against the majority and play with the lion and get eaten. That's what this reminds me of.

I love lemmings. They are so cute.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!