Was the moon landing faked ? I think so


Recommended Posts

the only argument for it being fake, and i mean only, is the amount of radiation they'd be exposed to. and well, they have suits for that kind of thing

Did you see the kinds of suits they wore? It was like having a thin layer of tin foil over you. I've seen pictures of their "space suits" and seen documentaries with scientists literally laughing about the fact that if these astronauts had gone through a radiation belt, with those suits on, they would have died instantaneously.

P.S. The russians still say it is impossible even today. Why not do it again? Anyone???

I am a believer that it was faked. If anyone has ever watched that one video that was on like ABC or NBC or whatever awhile ago, I believe what was documented on that video. Just what they explained and into detail too, just makes me think it was fake. It is one of those things that will probably never be revealed as being faked, but oh man, I would love to be alive that day if it ever happens :p

To non believers, it is your own opinion to believe it or not, if someone can provide the video, unless it has been mentioned in this thread, I recommend if you have time to spear to watch this, that you do. Or of course, just go read websites online as I see many links in here anyhow.

I think it still happened. I saw the "documentary" on the conspiracy and had doubts, but then I also looked at the replies given after (like the site soppychunk refers to) and came to the conclusion that it really did happen.

Of course, it was the Cold War, and there could have been other staged stuff to drive the point home (as mentioned by nealwainwright) BUT I still believe man landed on the moon.

As for doing it again, well when there is economic incentive to do it, it will happen again. NASA for now would rather focus on Mars and other projects.

I know, it seems this topic comes back from time to time :)

It seems some people can't accept that humans could go to the moon.

It is not that they can't, just in 1969, I do not think we did. And I only had replied since I saw it was recently replied to today, that is all.

You are nothing but a bunch of liberal democrats.

(LOL!)

If people think this is fake and there are a lot of people who think NASA as a ploy to beat the space race campaign... trumped this up

We have the most powerful telescope in the world up in space the Hubble telescope why don't NASA point this to the Moon and show the looner landing pod is till on the Moon this will rid all suspicions forever and prove beyond reasonable doubt it was no fake...

Funny thing I heard a while back....While Republicans believe that they are right, Democrats toy with the idea they may be wrong. I would rather give it a chance than to later be known as ignorant.

(Bush-WMD)

And I agree if the landing pod is in fact still there please put an end to all the conspiracies and take a picture, the only reason I can tell that is good enough for why they have not is perhaps there is no picture to take.

I am not sure if it is true or not but I will not simply ignore what seems to be valid arguments.

"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." - Euripides

This yet another example of how we are daily manipulated by our rulers.

I think this so caled 'moon landing' was actaully a Hollywood movie production.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/3543/moonfake.htm

What is, isn't and what isn't, is

Tell us what you think.

Some other cover-ups are exposed here:

http://cpscrimes.tripod.com/infowars.htm

hon, it was real...i was there. the moon is covered in green cheese and there are little moonmen wearing tutus running around. the martians use the moon as a weekend getaway. there is a colony of venusians on the dark side. a joint exploration team made up of martians and moonmen recently left to colonize pluto.

get over it

And I agree if the landing pod is in fact still there please put an end to all the conspiracies and take a picture, the only reason I can tell that is good enough for why they have not is perhaps there is no picture to take.

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

Good Excuse.

Cause there are people out there that will say that photo is faked, done up in photoshop.

No matter what you tell some people, they keep thinking something else, even if your right

e.g. "Im right cause i said i was, if you dont belive me your just not open-minded"

True, although it is getting increasingly harder to fake photos being so many experts in the field, even for NASA.

I would suspect that some people, like you say, would just keep on thinking what they have and just say it is a fake. But for others it might change their mind.....It is not an all or nothing request, even if it was proven to not be a fake some would still not believe....some defence on NASA's part is all people are asking. But since they haven't one starts to wonder why?

foto's or video's proofs nothing.

in this time is the technisian so good, that they can you everything believe what they want.

even 'your' own eyes can see something that isn't true/there.

back to optic: i do not know, i wasn't even on earth when this happend.

I"ve never been to the moon therefore the moon doesn't even exist. Its just a colossus mind control satellite placed in orbit by the US and European governments to make us believe we landed on it and believe all the other conspiracies!...

GO ME I'M DEFYING THE GOVERNMENT..

pfft ;)

The Moon Landing was real for the simple facts that are:

a) Faking it would just be stupid, it would obviiousely come out one day.

b) The USSR never called us on it. They had the technology to know wether or not we went and I guarantee you they were watching in 1969. Believe you me if we didn't go they would have been the first ones to call us on it.

c) They have pieces of the moon back on earth.

d) You're all gullible because you question everything, even the obviousely true, in your blind quest to make yourself unignorent, but while doing so refuse to believe even the obviousely true. You're like the opposite of a lemming. Imagine a bunch of Lemmings telling you not to try and play with a lion, but you, not believing them because after all they're lemmings, decide to go against the majority and play with the lion and get eaten. That's what this reminds me of.

The Moon Landing was real for the simple facts that are:

a) Faking it would just be stupid, it would obviiousely come out one day.

b) The USSR never called us on it. They had the technology to know wether or not we went and I guarantee you they were watching in 1969. Believe you me if we didn't go they would have been the first ones to call us on it.

c) They have pieces of the moon back on earth.

d) You're all gullible because you question everything, even the obviousely true, in your blind quest to make yourself unignorent, but while doing so refuse to believe even the obviousely true. You're like the opposite of a lemming. Imagine a bunch of Lemmings telling you not to try and play with a lion, but you, not believing them because after all they're lemmings, decide to go against the majority and play with the lion and get eaten. That's what this reminds me of.

I love lemmings. They are so cute.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!