Was the moon landing faked ? I think so


Recommended Posts

way to trust a geocities page as a source for your conspiracy theory that has been debated for years... :sleep:

:no:

hey brilliancy...

read the whole thread before you post...I am AGAINST those who think it was faked...

some people...

NO it was not fake, whoever came up with this bull**** is an idiot in the first place for even trying to say it was faked. Rediculous. I don't see how ANYone can believe that crap.

I love SintaX. I, of course, would be flamed to death for that post...

I am not hear to debate the fact that they moon Landing was faked or not.

However I do find it very interesting that so many people are convinced that it was not fake, and like I said who the hell knows if it was or not, just because we have been told it is real. To put such faith in the US Government and to believe that it was indeed real because They said it is, is just someone who is for lack of a better description, misinformed.

If you believe everything the Government says just because they are the Government, then They have you exactly where they want you to be... a complacent, mind washed member of Society whom just accepts everything at face value, and never looks beneath the surface.

Am I A Conspiracy Theorist? NO

Am I someone Who Does not trust the Powers That Be? YES. Damn Straight I Am. All with good reason I might add...

I am not going to go on and on with all of the reasons why, because I could easily write a Novel doing so (and since many others already have why bother), all I am saying is people... things are not True just because we are told they are.

Google Noam Chomsky. He is just one of many examples of people questioning the state of the world we live in. If you are truly interested PM me, I have some mp3's of lectures he has given as well...

I am not hear to debate the fact that they moon Landing was faked or not.

However I do find it very interesting that so many people are convinced that it was not fake, and like I said who the hell knows if it was or not, just because we have been told it is real. To put such faith in the US Government and to believe that it was indeed real because They said it is, is just someone who is for lack of a better description, misinformed.

If you believe everything the Government says just because they are the Government, then They have you exactly where they want you to be... a complacent, mind washed member of Society whom just accepts everything at face value, and never looks beneath the surface.

Am I A Conspiracy Theorist? NO

Am I someone Who Does not trust the Powers That Be? YES. Damn Straight I Am. All with good reason I might add...

I am not going to go on and on with all of the reasons why, because I could easily write a Novel doing so (and since many others already have why bother), all I am saying is people... things are not True just because we are told they are.

Google Noam Chomsky. He is just one of many examples of people questioning the state of the world we live in. If you are truly interested PM me, I have some mp3's of lectures he has given as well...

Right ON! :punk:

I don't know how many neowinians reading this post live in the UK, but there was a good programme on channel 5 a few wees back about the faked (apparently?) moon landings. There was this one guy who worked with NASA on it who insisted they were fake and claimed to have had the CIA try to assassinate him a few times.

I was quite convinced that the lunar landings were faked - they showed a photograph in which a moon rock with neil amstrong (or buzz aldrin) standing by it with the letter C written on it. There were also no stars on the photos.

Im still not convinced that they ever did land on a moon...im sure it was one great big NASA cover-up in order to make the russians thing that the USA had beaten them in the space race.

I don't know how many neowinians reading this post live in the UK, but there was a good programme on channel 5 a few wees back about the faked (apparently?) moon landings. There was this one guy who worked with NASA on it who insisted they were fake and claimed to have had the CIA try to assassinate him a few times.

I was quite convinced that the lunar landings were faked - they showed a photograph in which a moon rock with neil amstrong (or buzz aldrin) standing by it with the letter C written on it. There were also no stars on the photos.

Im still not convinced that they ever did land on a moon...im sure it was one great big NASA cover-up in order to make the russians thing that the USA had beaten them in the space race.

yes. you would know. some scientist guy somewhere on some television special said someone tried to kill him somewhere forseeing something and going to say something else because of something that was supposedly said somewhere.

great points!

I think it was faked. :yes:

There is no valid proof that it was real yet there are facts that state the opposite. :hmmm:

Somehow I'm also starting to doubt about the Mars landings. :whistle: It's an easy way to account for a lot of money that can be used for other purposes... :shifty:

  • 3 weeks later...

I know this topic is like dead but I felt the need to breathe some new life into it. I don't know if it was ever mentioned but it's kinda obvious, with our satelites up there, why have we never seen a photo of the flag on the moon? Did they take it off when they left or did they leave it. Also their footprints or anything like that, if they are powerful enough to see other planets clearly I think we can see some footprints on the moon. Also another obvious one is the wind on the flag, how the hell can it be straight unless something is blowing it? My questions may be ignorant with simply answers, if so please tell me they are driving me nuts.

I know this topic is like dead but I felt the need to breathe some new life into it. I don't know if it was ever mentioned but it's kinda obvious, with our satelites up there, why have we never seen a photo of the flag on the moon? Did they take it off when they left or did they leave it. Also their footprints or anything like that, if they are powerful enough to see other planets clearly I think we can see some footprints on the moon. Also another obvious one is the wind on the flag, how the hell can it be straight unless something is blowing it? My questions may be ignorant with simply answers, if so please tell me they are driving me nuts.

Our telescopes are so powerful that we have been able to see rover tracks and footprints on the moon.

But of course people will just tell you that a secret mission was launched in the 80's to finally put those there. :ninja: :alien: :ninja:

:p

For you conspiracy theorists out there, read this page (Moon Hoax section) which is maintained by an ACTUAL astronomer that discounts all the bull**** the Moon Hoax conspiracy theorists disseminate. Funny how someone in a position to really study and understand what happened, and how it happened, can factually refute point by point all the ramblings of conspiracy theorists...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hi all. I have a seven year old Acer laptop which according to Acer website can't receive the new MS updates. This device lives in my bedroom and is purely a consumption device. No gaming, no nothing. I have followed online instructions and turned off secure boot which now gives me a green tick in W11 Security. Now, I have MWB Premium now for several years and I'm reasonably careful with my online activity with this laptop. I'm also not a gamer in any way so I'm not asking much from this laptop. Given that, am I safe to continue using this device given I've turned off secure boot? That's it, that's my question.
    • finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!