Was the moon landing faked ? I think so

By enlightener
in It's a Conspiracy!

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

BOOGMaster

Posted
Posted
way to trust a geocities page as a source for your conspiracy theory that has been debated for years... :sleep:

:no:

hey brilliancy...

read the whole thread before you post...I am AGAINST those who think it was faked...

some people...

Mentor

BOOGMaster

Posted
Posted
NO it was not fake, whoever came up with this bull**** is an idiot in the first place for even trying to say it was faked. Rediculous. I don't see how ANYone can believe that crap.

I love SintaX. I, of course, would be flamed to death for that post...

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I am not hear to debate the fact that they moon Landing was faked or not.

However I do find it very interesting that so many people are convinced that it was not fake, and like I said who the hell knows if it was or not, just because we have been told it is real. To put such faith in the US Government and to believe that it was indeed real because They said it is, is just someone who is for lack of a better description, misinformed.

If you believe everything the Government says just because they are the Government, then They have you exactly where they want you to be... a complacent, mind washed member of Society whom just accepts everything at face value, and never looks beneath the surface.

Am I A Conspiracy Theorist? NO

Am I someone Who Does not trust the Powers That Be? YES. Damn Straight I Am. All with good reason I might add...

I am not going to go on and on with all of the reasons why, because I could easily write a Novel doing so (and since many others already have why bother), all I am saying is people... things are not True just because we are told they are.

Google Noam Chomsky. He is just one of many examples of people questioning the state of the world we live in. If you are truly interested PM me, I have some mp3's of lectures he has given as well...

Proficient

duhk

Posted
Posted
I am not hear to debate the fact that they moon Landing was faked or not.

However I do find it very interesting that so many people are convinced that it was not fake, and like I said who the hell knows if it was or not, just because we have been told it is real. To put such faith in the US Government and to believe that it was indeed real because They said it is, is just someone who is for lack of a better description, misinformed.

If you believe everything the Government says just because they are the Government, then They have you exactly where they want you to be... a complacent, mind washed member of Society whom just accepts everything at face value, and never looks beneath the surface.

Am I A Conspiracy Theorist? NO

Am I someone Who Does not trust the Powers That Be? YES. Damn Straight I Am. All with good reason I might add...

I am not going to go on and on with all of the reasons why, because I could easily write a Novel doing so (and since many others already have why bother), all I am saying is people... things are not True just because we are told they are.

Google Noam Chomsky. He is just one of many examples of people questioning the state of the world we live in. If you are truly interested PM me, I have some mp3's of lectures he has given as well...

Right ON! :punk:

Community Regular

mpat1024

Posted
Posted

I don't know how many neowinians reading this post live in the UK, but there was a good programme on channel 5 a few wees back about the faked (apparently?) moon landings. There was this one guy who worked with NASA on it who insisted they were fake and claimed to have had the CIA try to assassinate him a few times.

I was quite convinced that the lunar landings were faked - they showed a photograph in which a moon rock with neil amstrong (or buzz aldrin) standing by it with the letter C written on it. There were also no stars on the photos.

Im still not convinced that they ever did land on a moon...im sure it was one great big NASA cover-up in order to make the russians thing that the USA had beaten them in the space race.

Mentor

BOOGMaster

Posted
Posted
I don't know how many neowinians reading this post live in the UK, but there was a good programme on channel 5 a few wees back about the faked (apparently?) moon landings. There was this one guy who worked with NASA on it who insisted they were fake and claimed to have had the CIA try to assassinate him a few times.

I was quite convinced that the lunar landings were faked - they showed a photograph in which a moon rock with neil amstrong (or buzz aldrin) standing by it with the letter C written on it. There were also no stars on the photos.

Im still not convinced that they ever did land on a moon...im sure it was one great big NASA cover-up in order to make the russians thing that the USA had beaten them in the space race.

yes. you would know. some scientist guy somewhere on some television special said someone tried to kill him somewhere forseeing something and going to say something else because of something that was supposedly said somewhere.

great points!

Veteran

VGVL

Posted
Posted

I think it was faked. :yes:

There is no valid proof that it was real yet there are facts that state the opposite. :hmmm:

Somehow I'm also starting to doubt about the Mars landings. :whistle: It's an easy way to account for a lot of money that can be used for other purposes... :shifty:

  • 3 weeks later...
Grand Master

Xero

Posted
Posted

I know this topic is like dead but I felt the need to breathe some new life into it. I don't know if it was ever mentioned but it's kinda obvious, with our satelites up there, why have we never seen a photo of the flag on the moon? Did they take it off when they left or did they leave it. Also their footprints or anything like that, if they are powerful enough to see other planets clearly I think we can see some footprints on the moon. Also another obvious one is the wind on the flag, how the hell can it be straight unless something is blowing it? My questions may be ignorant with simply answers, if so please tell me they are driving me nuts.

Grand Master

neoufo51

Posted
Posted
I know this topic is like dead but I felt the need to breathe some new life into it. I don't know if it was ever mentioned but it's kinda obvious, with our satelites up there, why have we never seen a photo of the flag on the moon? Did they take it off when they left or did they leave it. Also their footprints or anything like that, if they are powerful enough to see other planets clearly I think we can see some footprints on the moon. Also another obvious one is the wind on the flag, how the hell can it be straight unless something is blowing it? My questions may be ignorant with simply answers, if so please tell me they are driving me nuts.

Our telescopes are so powerful that we have been able to see rover tracks and footprints on the moon.

But of course people will just tell you that a secret mission was launched in the 80's to finally put those there. :ninja: :alien: :ninja:

:p

Contributor

efishta

Posted
Posted

For you conspiracy theorists out there, read this page (Moon Hoax section) which is maintained by an ACTUAL astronomer that discounts all the bull**** the Moon Hoax conspiracy theorists disseminate. Funny how someone in a position to really study and understand what happened, and how it happened, can factually refute point by point all the ramblings of conspiracy theorists...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic

      By +Edouard · Posted

      I'm so conflicted with the Google Search AI summaries. On one hand I don't like how it's harming smaller websites by greatly reducing traffic which will harm us all in the long run but on the other hand those AI summaries often give me the information I'm after. I have never once clicked on 'show me more' though and never will.
    • Microsoft raises Xbox console prices by up to $150, discontinues 2TB version

      By qbrick · Posted

      Not a single company as small or large it may be is obligated to subsidize its products and sell them at a loss. Your way of thinking is socialist and as a West German with a German brother state but impoverished by state dictatorship and a socialist command economy situated to the East i can tell you - this kind of thinking very quickly leads to products not being produced anymore at all.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji The iPhone Fold is one of the most anticipated tech products expected to debut this fall. It will be Apple’s first foldable iPhone, ushering in a new product category for the company. While the first generation has yet to hit the shelves, a new leak suggests Apple has already begun work on its successor. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the second-generation iPhone Fold has already been confirmed, meaning Apple could launch a successor in fall 2027. The foldable iPhone is also reportedly referred to as the “iPhone Ultra,” though it remains unclear whether Apple will ultimately choose that branding, especially as Samsung is rumored to rename the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as the Galaxy Z Fold Ultra this year. The leaker also claims that the second-generation foldable will feature a wider folding display while reusing the same screen found in the first generation. Apple’s first foldable iPhone is expected to feature a 7.8-inch inner display and a 5.3-inch outer screen in a passport-style form factor. It has already been reported that Apple plans to change its iPhone release cycle in 2026 to spread launches throughout the year. Under this strategy, the iPhone Fold is expected to debut this fall alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. The standard iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2 are expected to arrive later in 2026 or in early 2027. Speaking of the iPhone Air, Digital Chat Station says Apple remains undecided about a third-generation model. The company is reportedly waiting to see how the iPhone Air 2 performs in the market, and if sales disappoint, a successor may never materialize. As we reported this week, the iPhone Air has not been scrapped from Apple’s plans. The second-generation model is reportedly scheduled for spring 2027 and could introduce upgrades such as an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography and improved battery life.
    • Sony announces Bungie layoffs that will affect "significant number of employees"

      By daryld · Posted

      ahh yes the good old your opinion differs from mine so you are therefore insane lol destiny 1 had no agenda pushing and was a massive success of a game, if you clearly look online the team for some reason thought they had too many men on the team and went on a woman and dei recruitment drive and we all know how destiny 2 performed from then on in
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers

      By Nas · Posted

      The limited imaginations and business acumen of non-dominant players is simply that: the abject lack of creative business acumen. Businesses often want to operate in a financially-rewarding marketplace (free market economics) and/or exit/cash-out at maximal financial recompense. Money is their incentive; regulations are both their obstacles and their tools; politics is their means of influencing the marketplace. Google, in this story's example, is crying that AWS and Azure are "too dominant" -- cuz Google Cloud is not printing as much money as Alphabet wants (although it is still dramatically more than they actually need). The EU DMA should truly follow-the-money and treat the EU as its own sovereign nation in order to protect European market players: Domestic entities are exempt from market-influence regulations until absolute monopoly is achieved; Foreign (non-EU/non-Euro) entities are all regulated via stricter DMA measures whereby regulated partnership with independent domestic entity becomes the only way for foreign entities to 'tip the scale' for favorable financial remunerations. Basically create a dual-track aligning with China's foreign investment models. In my eyes, this is the only way to properly protect the European marketplace beyond the current dot-com/ai-bubble/social-media crazes.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Vistor earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      406
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      131
    4. 4
      Xenon
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!