Are You a Console or PC Gamer?  

2090 members have voted

  1. 1. Are You a Console or PC Gamer?

    • Console (Xbox, PS2, Gamecube, other, etc)
      336
    • Computer (PC/Mac/linux)
      1101
    • Both
      653


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been a console gamer since I first got my SEGA Master System. I currently have a Xbox 360 and prefer it for most games (sports, racing, etc...). Admitedly the PC is better for FPS games but I have neither the funds nor the inclination to upgrade my graphics cards in order to play the latest games.

  • 3 weeks later...

I prefer the PC for many reasons.

The controls. Console gamers will say they can do just as much with a controler than a mouse and keyboard, but thats just because they got used to it, whereas First Person Shooters played with a mouse are simpler, and more realistic (as you dont have to hold the paddle as your aim moves, your aim moves as you move your mouse).

I'd need a new TV. I've got an old CRT TV with a pretty small screen. I wouldn't buy a new one because I don't have cable or satellite (antenna FTW).

You dont need a supercomputer. Pentium D840 from early 2005, 2gb of 667mhz memory and a Radeon 2600 can handle Bioshock at maximum specs, Crysis and COD4 at medium-high. This computer isn't worth alot of money (around 360$, I'd say) , and it plays games from late 2007-2008 pretty darn well. Its getting old now, but remember that most of it is made up of 2005 hardware. You certainly don't have to buy hardware every few months to be able to play games.

Consoles performance gets old fast. When the seventh generation consoles came out, they seemed to leave PCs in the dust, but now PC games have just as good graphics (at significantly higher resolutions too!). The thing is a new generation of consoles is only released every five years or so, and the old one loses its appeal compared to the quality of PCs. Think about 2004-2005, the games on the PC, like Half-life 2 among others, had clearly superior graphics. No doubt console game developers must've needed alot of extra effort to try to make their games look good on aging hardware.

  • 1 month later...

I'd say PC is very attractive to play games but consoles also have it's better uses in gaming - racing and puzzles.

Many shooting game makers lack the acknowledge of controller customization for example I personally feel better at playing FPS on Xbox360 if the left stick is mainly used for looking up and down and skaifing and the right stick assigned to walking forward and look left and right (the typical of Halo CE Xbox controller setup).

My computer does suck at gaming but luckily can play TF2 and other Valve games on it great.

  • 2 weeks later...
PC gaming all the way baby! I think the last consoles I owned were the SNES and a Sega Genesis w/the 32x add-on.

Mines the PS2. I actually think the PC can out beat a console, even at gaming, you would just have to reallly stress that puppy up with the latest and best hardware; Skulltrail mobo, dual QX9775, 8GBs of RAM, 3xSLI 9800GTX, 1TB HDD, Blu-ray drive, T1 internet connection. I'll be damned if that rig can't beat both the PS3 and the XBOX 360... put together! :laugh:

I much prefer PC Gaming, mainly as my favourite genre is RTS :p

The only real thing which annoys me with PC Gaming is the amount of DRM which is being pushed onto us at the moment.

If your created a game, and saw thousands of gamers had your game but your income did not increase (meaning they didn't pay), wouldn't you increase the DRM on your upcomming games? Or better yet, update the game while introducing newer and better security against piraters.

i used to be console until all the hidden costs of them got the better of me, games for consoles are ridiculously over-priced compared to there pc counterparts.

PC's aren't meant for gaming, they were originally designed for solving problems the human mind could not calculate rapidly; hence the name, "computer." Consoles are designed for gaming and only gaming; Sony added the feature of multimedia playback in their PS2, (DVD Video, Music CD capabilities) which was then adapted onward to the PS3 and Microsoft's XBOX 360.

PC gaming is somewhat flawed because it does not dedicate itself to the gaming, it still calculates the rest of the operating system while you play, which is where computer lag usually comes from.

Both, really. For the past several years, it was mainly console (GameCube/PS2) because my old laptop sucked. But back when it was new (and even before that on my old Pentium II Dell), i played a lot of PC games in the late 90s on to about 2003 (when the laptop started feeling its age). About 9 months ago, I built a new gaming PC and have mainly been playing PC games since (a combination of playing catchup and nothing really noteworthy coming out on the PS2). On theo ther hand, I've been a console gamer since I was 4 (meaning about 21 years).

So I just voted both. :p

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

BOTH!

but for various reasons.

PC:

Customization, smoothness and accuracy of controls. You can't beat that.

Graphics. A pro and a con. While games will run longer on an older hardware, you have to upgrade to get the best for the newer games, unless you overclock with confidance then you get real bang for your buck.

Multi Player. I find PC gamers much more social and competent when working in teams.

Console:

Cheaper, in some cases.

Specialization. Like an apple, it's components are mostly made specifically for the console to work like a single entity (in theory).

Graphics: while hardware does get older b4 a new console comes out, graphics don't suffer much, if any. Just look at what Nintendo did with Mario and Mario 3. Huge diffrence with the graphics on the same hardware. Same with PS1.

Multiplayer: 4 ppl can't play on one PC.

I say consoles because they are designed just for games.

PCs on the other hand can always be upgraded but will cost you a lot more money than a simple console.

($300 Xbox 360 + $200 for 4 games = $500 whereas a good gaming PC is $800+)

Ironically, I'm a PC gamer because I can't afford a console. :laugh:

  • 2 weeks later...

i have a ps2 but i rarely play it. i prefere playing games on my computer because when i get bored of playing games i can straight away do other thimngs without having to switch of the console and go to my computer. i can also be on msn and stuff while i'm playing games.

i also prefere the controls on pc's instead of consoles. especially with first person shooters. imagine trying to snipe with a bloody console control. with a pc you use the mouse to snipe which is much more accurate.

PC is good for the power it can deliver, and ability to play any sort of media with no real restraint on codecs with many extra functions but may fail on price point while Consoles have great ease of use and are quite relatively cheap. Right now just playing on the PS3 but will set up a powerful PC once I graduate and start working =)

And PC are better for some games mostly because developers dont have keyboard support. PS3 and Xbox 360 controllers both work on the PC which is great =). Cant wait to play PES 2009 on 1080p with my friend on his PC, him using a Xbox 360 controller and I will be using the PS3 remote =)

  • 1 month later...
PC's are only good if you can afford a top-of-the line system every few years. Other than that, you can get a great experience with just a console and not have to worry about it not living up to the performance demands of a game.

I agree. I've actually quit PC gaming altogether. So tired of having to upgrade all the time. I'm now considering a console instead and might leap on the PS3 when it drops to $299 in April.

Consider that I spent $534 on my old Radeon X1900XT, $383 on a Radeon X800XT All-In-Wonder and $369 on the Radeon 9700 Pro before that. What a waste of money.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!