Recommended Posts

@ Zalmanleib

"Autostreamer fails on SP2 final

capcab.exe crashes and autostreamer claims sp is unknown and the next button is grayed out"

I had same error. Took a shot at changing the name of the folder SP2 was in. All I did was remove the spaces in the folder name, and tried Autostreamer again. It worked!!! I have no idea why or if it is repeatable, but .... after Shabbos, you might want to give it a try.

Downloaded the program, and tired to slipstream Windows XP SP-2 RTM (Release to manufacturing) version to my Windows XP CD that has Windows XP SP-1 already slipstreamed. I don't have an original CD.

Anyways I insert the CD (Windows XP Pro Corp.) and run the program, I click next, then I get an error: "Run-time error "76". Path not found, then the program closes.

Any help? thanks

could this maybe advanced to stream microsoft office service packs as well. :) i would so love that. i always have trouble with office sp's rather than the windows ones.

BTW great work! :D

Edited by Cierro
However fails to integrate the SP2 files on my Dell Win XP SP1a reinstall CD. The resulting iso is simply a copy of the Dell CD.

Most of those reinstall CD's contain images that restore the whole system, not just XP. I think the Dell's have customized files that look at the hardware to verify it is a Dell system, otherwise it will fail. If SP2 doesn't like it, then it will not integrate. I has similar problems with non-sp2 iso's being created when I tried to use Autostreamer on a Windows 2000 workstation. It appeared to have worked, but the iso was not integrated.

Of all the runtime errors noted in this thread, instances like this are not reported.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!