[Review] Logitech z-5500


Recommended Posts

A 3.5MM MiniJack to RCA Y-Splitter.

And for the other question.  Ther eis a hiss at high volume but that is normal on speakers.  Almost, if not all speakers do that.  Its not very noticable.  God the audigy makes these speakers less good.  God damn audigy.  Me wants M-Audio.

584757771[/snapback]

So Logitech sells this system without all the parts needed to connect it to a standard sound card?

First off, i got the Z-680's a long time ago, (in fact that Input+Settings thing doesn't show me a firmware version... in fact shows nothing hehe) but i have been very happy with them :)

I do agree with them not being perfect for music however, for instance on my set if you put all volumes on "middle" settings and play "Black Eyed Peas - Lets Get Retared" the bass is *very* distored (after some testing it seems to be the higher range of the crossover at higher volmes and certain freq). I do of course just have a seperate equilaiser setting for music now ;)

Also the "hiss" everyone talks about doesn't really seem to be a problem for me, if i turn them on and put my ear right next to the speaker i can hear it, 4 inchs away... can't hear it, and as the latest control centers have this fixed anyways, i think the Z-5500 would certianly not suffer from it...in fact if you *have* to think of the 5500 as a better 680 set... think of it as a bigger, better "refined" set. everything about the specs and reviews is bigger/better/clearer than the 680s

I am looking to upgrade and i have my Z-680s connected to my PC, HD top box and DVD Player/XBOX (last two share optical, HD box on the coax, PC uses the 3x2 stereo mini jacks to a Herc Game Theater XP 7.1) i also have my rears and fronts on the walls.... (althrough strictly in dolby digital setups, they arn't rears, they are "side" speakers... but i dont care *that* much... lol)

what i would really like to know is, if i take down my 680s... would the 5500's fit in the same wall mounted positions? what i did was swivel the stands and screw them in through the two holes on the stand

from reading all the specs the main thing i loved was "distortion free bass" thats what i wanna have :)

im from australia tho, and aparently we have to wait till nov for the first shipment, my syd suppler got 1025 units and have sold 698 already on "pre-order" hehe, not bad going really, $499 AUD

So Logitech sells this system without all the parts needed to connect it to a standard sound card?

584759714[/snapback]

No they do, this is an issue involving Creative. They are putting a proprietary connector on the card that is NOT standard.

Standard would be Optical or Coax out, Creative uses the Digital Minijack and only ships the adaptor with their OWN speaker systems and will not sell the adaptor separately.

No they do, this is an issue involving Creative. They are putting a proprietary connector on the card that is NOT standard.

Standard would be Optical or Coax out, Creative uses the Digital Minijack and only ships the adaptor with their OWN speaker systems and will not sell the adaptor separately.

584763652[/snapback]

So is that just with the Audigy 2? :unsure:

Hey my first post. Just a few questions.

I want to get a speaker system hookup for my ps2 and dvd player. i just dont know enough about hooking up so il ask these questions.

1. since these speakers dont use speakerwire how long are the cables that come with them, liquid gave 25' as the length for the rear channels. is that in feet? and how long are the wires for the front channels

2. Also is possible to hook a av reciever to this system.

3. how do you use the surround sound feature, from dvds and video games off the ps2 or a dvd player.

4.  would you recommend using the z-5500 for a home theather system?

5. how would i try to hook up my tv to the system. I do have a headphoen jack in the front of the tv but i was hoping their was a alternate option.

584758692[/snapback]

1) no idea whatsoever hehe

2) if you mean can you connect normal stereo inputs from the RCA red/white/yellow, then yes. the 3 stereo mini jacks work as either 6 speaker input for say a PC, or as 3 seperate stereo inputs. You will of course need RCA -> Stereo Mini Jack connectors :), this is of course another + from the 680s as they can't do that.... its early so maybe i got what you were talking about wrong here

3) for surround sound to work correctly, you need to get information to all 6 speakers at once, and for dolby digital and DTS you need a decoder aswell. the easy way is to use the Optical out on your PS2 or DVD player and connect that to the speakers (using of course optical cable from a store, doesn't come with the speakers). Now i believe the PS2 doesn't have an Coax digital out... but your dvd player might.... so if your lucky you can connect both at the same time :)

also, like the XBOX, you should will be able to use the optical out for all sound on the ps2, not just games/dvd's that use surround sound

4) Absolutely, with support for DTS 96/24 (Studio quality sound) its even more viable than the 680's are as a HT system

Im just wondering, if you connect 2 sets of the Logitech Z-5500 5.1 speakers, and make a 10.2 system, that is, u have a set of speakers near the floor, and the other set near the ceiling, that will create a more imerssive enviroment. But how do you connect these two sets together, like into a DVD player or PC sound card. Im in Australia, so I gotta wait until November 15, for them to be released, and Im getting one set. If its mad, I'll get another, but how do i connect them?????

Im just wondering, if you connect 2 sets of the Logitech Z-5500 5.1 speakers, and make a 10.2 system, that is, u have a set of speakers near the floor, and the other set near the ceiling, that will create a more imerssive enviroment. But how do you connect these two sets together, like into a DVD player or PC sound card. Im in Australia, so I gotta wait until November 15, for them to be released, and Im getting one set. If its mad, I'll get another, but how do i connect them?????

584772518[/snapback]

No that wouldn't work.

1. I just wouldn't work

2. Name a 10.2 channnel source... ;)

Liquid,

It seems like you only use the digital in with no analog input on your speaker? In creative sound card, the digital out is either dolby digital or DTS. If you need all 6 channels to do digital out, you need 2 digital out right (like connecting to creative dtt-3500)

It seems like you do a real-time dolby encoding on your sound card, so you can send dolby signal to your speaker (to overcome the issues above). Is that correct? But by doing so, i mean, Dolby is pretty compressed anyway, isn't it better to just connect audio card to speaker with both 6 channels direct + digital out? So if you play games or do normal work, use 6 channels direct, if you watch movie then switch to digital out.

P.S. is the headphone jack on the back of the control panel?

Could you take some shots of the back of the control center and, if possible, the back of your sound card?  I want to see how it's connected exactly.

584776839[/snapback]

Will do ASAP, I modded my audigy plat deck now to use the Coax out on it so i just have a cable coming from inside my computer lol.

AWWK! My mom has my camera, I have to wait till she gets home.

No they do, this is an issue involving Creative. They are putting a proprietary connector on the card that is NOT standard.

Standard would be Optical or Coax out, Creative uses the Digital Minijack and only ships the adaptor with their OWN speaker systems and will not sell the adaptor separately.

584763652[/snapback]

I don't have an Audigy 2, but it seems to be a regular optical mini-jack. An adapter to connect up a regular optical cable to one of these is about ?2, and most optical cables come with the adapter now. Mine is over a year old, and was a cheap ?10 cable (quality doesn't matter; it's digital and optical doesn't need shielding) and it still came with the adapter. Infact I'm using it right now with my iMac.

First off, i got the Z-680's a long time ago, (in fact that Input+Settings thing doesn't show me a firmware version... in fact shows nothing hehe) but i have been very happy with the:):)

Hold down input / settings on the reciever unit for 5-10 seconds and it'll tell you. This does not work with the remote, you need to press the buttons on the actual unit. (when it is in standby)

Doing this will reset all your settings though, so make a note beforehand if you've spent a while tweaking the system.

I do agree with them not being perfect for music however, for instance on my set if you put all volumes on "middle" settings and play "Black Eyed Peas - Lets Get Retared" the bass is *very* distored (after some testing it seems to be the higher range of the crossover at higher volmes and certain freq). I do of course just have a seperate equilaiser setting for music no;);)

The bass level on the z680s should be set to one bar from off, and anything higher than three bars will distort at higher volumesHoweverb> even at its lowest setting some would argue that it is putting out too much bass. I know I wish there was somewhere inbetween that and zero at times.

Bass is not supposed to drown out the other sounds (like it does when you start approaching the midway point on the setting) it is supposed to accompany it. However most people just think the louder it is the better it is...

Also the "hiss" everyone talks about doesn't really seem to be a problem for me, if i turn them on and put my ear right next to the speaker i can hear it, 4 inchs away... can't hear it, and as the latest control centers have this fixed anyways, i think the Z-5500 would certianly not suffer from it...in fact if you *have* to think of the 5500 as a better 680 set... think of it as a bigger, better "refined" set. everything about the specs and reviews is bigger/better/clearer than the 680s

There was only a hiss "issue" pre 1.1.2 firmware, it has been fixed. There is still some degree of white noise (hiss) when the speakers are on, particularly noticable when nothing is playing, but this is typical of a powerful speaker system.

from reading all the specs the main thing i loved was "distortion free bass" thats what i wanna hav:):)

For the price, I guarantee you that it will not be "distortion free bass" It may not distort until higher levels, but it will definitely distort. Different people have different impressions of what actuallisi> distortion. For example, you said you only notice it when it's set half-way or above. I notice it on anything louder than one bar when the system is at higher volumes, however this is not a problem as even the lowest setting is too high at these levels in many cases (especially from analogue sources as they tend to have "muddy" bass.

The speaker cabling is the main reason I won't be upgrading though. The speakers may be slightly improved, and certainly look a bit nicer (although I think the z680s will actually look better in my setup than these) but the fact that it uses RCA cables means that there will be quite an extra cost added on to them, as the cables they come with are too short for me. (and I have a small room) Had they used standard speaker wire like the z680 I would probably have picked them up, but I have already spent over ?100 on the wiring in my room, and am not prepared to do the same again for inferior cables.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!