578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

The thing that everyone seems to forget about these browser flame wars is that Firefox is an infant compared to Opera and IE. Opera and IE should be leaps and bounds ahead of Firefox in every aspect of the browser world, but they aren't. Firefox is comparable and in some instances, better than IE and Opera. Atleast Opera still cares about their browser, but the fee will forever hold it back (yes, I know technically that its free, but who wants a third of their browser window filled with ads?) . IE, on the other hand, has basically been the same browser for the past few years (yes, they added a popup blocker and a few other band aids, big deal!). Until Microsoft starts to care about IE again and you can surf with it without getting loaded with BHO's, viruses and spyware and until Opera is totally free and free of ads, Firefox will continue its climb to the top.

The thing that everyone seems to forget about these browser flame wars is that Firefox is an infant compared to Opera and IE.  Opera and IE should be leaps and bounds ahead of Firefox in every aspect of the browser world, but they aren't.  Firefox is comparable and in some instances, better than IE and Opera.  Atleast Opera still cares about their browser, but the fee will forever hold it back (yes, I know technically that its free, but who wants a third of their browser window filled with ads?) .  IE, on the other hand, has basically been the same browser for the past few years (yes, they added a popup blocker and a few other band aids, big deal!).  Until Microsoft starts to care about IE again and you can surf with it without getting loaded with BHO's, viruses and spyware and until Opera is totally free and free of ads, Firefox will continue its climb to the top.

585404779[/snapback]

As has been covered COUNTLESS times in this thread is that Opera 6 was a complete rewrite, so Opera is not THAT much older. You also seem to forget that Firefox is built on Mozilla, which owes some of it's origins to good ol' Netscape. (Try reading back a couple of pages :rolleyes:)

Interesting how these "geek wars" keep reinventing themselves. I guess this is something like the third browser war, the first being Mosaic vs. Netscape, then Netscape vs. IE, and now Opera vs. Firefox. Personally I enjoyed far more the PC vs. Mac war, and not to forget the Windows vs. UNIX/Linux wars.

As has been covered COUNTLESS times in this thread  is that Opera 6 was a complete rewrite, so Opera is not THAT much older. You also seem to forget that Firefox is built on Mozilla, which owes some of it's origins to good ol' Netscape. (Try reading back a couple of pages :rolleyes:)

585404827[/snapback]

Rewrite or not they still charge to use it (again, I know that its free with the ads) and there are quite a few things that are still the same which makes it an updated browser, not 100% new. Opera IS better than IE. Yes, Firefox has some Mozilla (Netscape) in it. but, download all three sometime and tell me what they have in common. Netscape and Mozilla are "heavy" browsers that are almost non customizable and fairly slow compared to Opera, IE and Firefox.

Rewrite or not they still charge to use it (again, I know that its free with the ads) and there are quite a few things that are still the same which makes it an updated browser, not 100% new.  Opera IS better than IE.  Yes, Firefox has some Mozilla (Netscape) in it.  but, download all three sometime and tell me what they have in common.  Netscape and Mozilla are "heavy" browsers that are almost non customizable and fairly slow compared to Opera, IE and Firefox.

585404922[/snapback]

Actually, they rewrote a LOT with 7.0 and even more with 8.0.

Firefox was based off of mozilla, which was based off of netscape. It's code-base is quite old, as is shown by comments on the code from the 1990s. Firefox makes complete use of The Gecko Rendering engine (Mozilla) and XUL (Mozilla). They only new thing they really offered is the plug-in system (which is definately nice).

Your argument has been refuted before and is FUD. Stop.

Actually, they rewrote a LOT with 7.0 and even more with 8.0.

Firefox was based off of mozilla, which was based off of netscape.  It's code-base is quite old, as is shown by comments on the code from the 1990s.  Firefox makes complete use of The Gecko Rendering engine (Mozilla) and XUL (Mozilla).  They only new thing they really offered is the plug-in system (which is definately nice). 

Your argument has been refuted before and is FUD.  Stop.

585404951[/snapback]

I never said that Firefox wasn't Mozilla, I know that, my diploma says I know these things :D . If a Ford F-150 has the same motor in it as the Mustang, does that make the F-150 as fast as the Mustang? No. Because the F-150 is heavier and bloated. I've tested the Mozilla based browsers and Opera at my computer shop and Firefox is a third faster than Netscape and Mozilla and twice as fastt as IE and slightly faster than Opera.

(Thought I'd throw Opera in because you are an Opera user).

Your diploma says you graduated, nothing more. Don't act like it makes you know more than anyone else. Of course Firefox is faster than Mozilla! No one is arguing that! They did a wonderful job stripping down Netscape.

But that does not change the fact that it's core is Mozilla code. It's rendering engine and UI engine ARE mozilla code, plain and simple fact. Your F150/mustang argument holds no water.

Again, the point we are refuting of yours is that Opera is "older code" and should be "more mature" and firefox is "new" and "still maturing". I think it's already been shown in this thread to be false.

The thing that everyone seems to forget about these browser flame wars is that Firefox is an infant compared to Opera and IE.  Opera and IE should be leaps and bounds ahead of Firefox in every aspect of the browser world, but they aren't.  Firefox is comparable and in some instances, better than IE and Opera.  Atleast Opera still cares about their browser, but the fee will forever hold it back (yes, I know technically that its free, but who wants a third of their browser window filled with ads?) .  IE, on the other hand, has basically been the same browser for the past few years (yes, they added a popup blocker and a few other band aids, big deal!).  Until Microsoft starts to care about IE again and you can surf with it without getting loaded with BHO's, viruses and spyware and until Opera is totally free and free of ads, Firefox will continue its climb to the top.

585404779[/snapback]

You don't know what you're talking about.

FF infant compared to Opera or IE? The argument has been debunked many times.

A third of browser window filled with ads in Opera? I thought your diploma said you should know this thing.

Firefox will continue its climb to the top? What's your point? Market share does not represent quality.

I never said that Firefox wasn't Mozilla, I know that, my diploma says I know these things  :D .

585405038[/snapback]

Let's just shut down Neowin, you guys. This fellow has a diploma.

A DIPLOMA! DO YOU REALISE THE INCREDIBLE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS? HE'S MENTIONED IT SIX TIMES IN THIS THREAD ALONE. THAT'S HOW COOL IT IS, YOU GUYS.

Now let's all stop arguing, realise what feeble minds we truly have, and just bow. And be thankful that we have such a wise, distinguished academic amongst us.

Netscape and Mozilla are "heavy" browsers that are almost non customizable and fairly slow compared to Opera, IE and Firefox.

585404922[/snapback]

Firefox is Mozilla, << removed >>. Your diploma mustn't be very good, as you can't see that it's called MOZILLA Firefox.

I mean......your posts are the dumbest things that I have read today....if I had less self control and was a little more tired I'd probably tell you to << removed >>.

Instead, I'm going to recommend for you to sue the Education establishment.

Edited by markjensen
Let's just shut down Neowin, you guys. This fellow has a diploma.

A DIPLOMA! DO YOU REALISE THE INCREDIBLE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS? HE'S MENTIONED IT SIX TIMES IN THIS THREAD ALONE. THAT'S HOW COOL IT IS, YOU GUYS.

Now let's all stop arguing, realise what feeble minds we truly have, and just bow. And be thankful that we have such a wise, distinguished academic amongst us.

585405959[/snapback]

:rofl: Long live todbran!!!

overall speed wise ... opera is probably best... but for me i like firefox cause it's free and i like it's interface better and it's cleaner and simpler than opera is.

although after a few tweaks etc... i could argue that firefox is close if not he same as opera.

just my thoughts.

The thing that everyone seems to forget about these browser flame wars is that Firefox is an infant compared to Opera and IE.  Opera and IE should be leaps and bounds ahead of Firefox in every aspect of the browser world, but they aren't.  Firefox is comparable and in some instances, better than IE and Opera.

What you are conveniently ignoring is that while Opera has gradually improved over time, and added new things as necessary, Firefox has been able to add all these things in one go because Opera already invented them. Software is not like people, that mature, and everyone takes a lot of time to learn new things, etc. Browsers are software. It gets the features you program it to get, and you can do everything in one go.

And of course, Firefox is based on Mozilla, which is several years old. And Opera 7 was a complete rewrite.

So yours is simply a nonsensical argument which does not hold water, and it kind of shows how little you understand about software development :no:

Atleast Opera still cares about their browser, but the fee will forever hold it back (yes, I know technically that its free, but who wants a third of their browser window filled with ads?) .

This is a pure troll. The ad does not take up a third of the screen.

although after a few tweaks etc... i could argue that firefox is close if not he same as opera.

585406978[/snapback]

Heh, yeah :)

Here's my Opera, although it should have more stuff in the personal bar, but it's the basic layout I use. However, there are disadvantages with this browser, not in speed, but in lack of extension support (and no, it doesn't come with everything I want pre-packaged; I think that's not a good thing to aim for either since it becomes cluttered if they try to please everyone).

Firefox is Mozilla, idiot. Your diploma mustn't be very good, as you can't see that it's called MOZILLA Firefox.

No, Seamonkey is one browser, Firefox another. What people generally mean with "Mozilla" when speaking of browsers, they mean the browser code named Seamonkey part of the Mozilla Suite, which is everything but Firefox. Both are made by the same team though, but just like MICROSOFT Outlook and MICROSOFT Word aren't the same apps, these aren't either. Firefox branched of Seamonkey a long time ago now and have unique features, and vice versa. Firefox isn't a subset / "light" version of Seamonkey either. And please stop insulting people, this thread is bad enough already.

post-21023-1107437483_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jugalator
Really?

Doesn't sound quite like it. Make up your mind...?:whistle::

585126164[/snapback]

I never said that Firefox wasn't Mozilla, I know that, my diploma says I know these things?:D:D .?  If a Ford F-150 has the same motor in it as the Mustang, does that make the F-150 as fast as the Mustang?? No.? Because the F-150 is heavier and bloated.? I've tested the Mozilla based browsers and Opera at my computer shop and Firefox is a third faster than Netscape and Mozilla and twice as fastt as IE and slightly faster than Opera.

(Thought I'd throw Opera in because you are an Opera user).

585405038[/snapback]

Oh..look who'se back.

Click on the snapback in the initial quote and see, maybe you forgot to answer:rolleyes:leyes:

I know it's most likely been said but if Opera would lower it's price say to about 20 bucks i think it would be more popular.

585407848[/snapback]

It's $20 for students.
I guess , opera must be an open source application like FF, then it will be more popular and better.

Just my opinion  :)

585408677[/snapback]

More popular? Maybe. Better? No. Open source != better.
I guess , opera must be an open source application like FF, then it will be more popular and better.

Just my opinion  :)

585408677[/snapback]

Open-source doesn't say anything about quality. To me, Opera is far better than Firefox. So by your logic, Firefox would be better if it was closed-source?

Open-source doesn't say anything about quality. To me, Opera is far better than Firefox. So by your logic, Firefox would be better if it was closed-source?

585412032[/snapback]

I dint mean that..., most of them wont go for opera because it is not free...many of the post there in the thread shows light on this....

Just want to tell that it will become more popular.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!