Ashlee Simpson SNL Disaster


Is Ashlee Simpson's lip synching messup going to ruin her career permanently ?  

457 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Ashlee Simpson's lip synching messup going to ruin her career permanently ?

    • Yes, Ashlee is ruined, and she'll never recover
      293
    • No, Ashlee will bounce back
      164


Recommended Posts

I can see why they would record the live preformances, but record the whole damn thing, not just the audio. It looks cheesy and unprofessional. To me, if they were to record it, they should do the whole thing(video, as well as audio). So in this case, it looks like she was lipsyching because she sucks.

The fact that she does not write her own songs scores one for us as well. At least I would have believed the idea that they recorded it for safety purposes rather than sucky purposes a little more.

The point its, she has very little talent. If she cannot write her own music, whos to say she cannot SING her own music as well?

Washington Here....

ooooo, She blamed the band. If you look at the tape, there is a time when the gutar players arn't even playing. :(

And, they faded out her vocals when they realized she missed it.

It's one thing to mess up, it's another thing to blame it on someone else.

I be the band is pi$$ed.

I think I heard her say "My band started playing the wrong song."

I'm sorry, but how does the entire band make a mistake of playing a completely different song? Wouldn't it be more like one member messing up, like, say...Ashlee Simpson?

explain in a little bit :rolleyes: ... crap pop singers have been lip syncing for years , this is why i have no respect for them, they are fake, phonies and liars. I absoluetly despise them as dirt...

584796090[/snapback]

after reading this whole thread, i find it funny that you guys don't listen to pop. pop is still music regardless what genre it be. like this kid i quoted. he listens to a band that does nothing but scream like b*tches and wrestle each other on stage, wearing mask like it's wwe. it's a gimmick.

back to the topic

her pride must be hurt after that mishappen.

I'd hate to be the realist here but didn't she do "Pieces of Me" earlier in the show? The song on the SNL video is the begining to "Pieces of Me" (On a Monday and I'm waiting...) and I find it unlikely that she would do the same song twice, even if she is an one-hit wonder. You can even see her do a "WTF wince" when she hears the begining to "Pieces of Me" instead of whatever song she was going to actually sing. In a related topic, I'm a big fan of the groupthink displayed here, half the posts in this thread consists of some variation on the word "0wned"...it's like a l33t-speak feeding frenzy. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if some people didn't even see the video, they just saw "0wned" in a couple of posts, read the topic title ("Ashlee Simpson caught LIPSYNCHING on SNL" isn't entirely objective), and they decided to add to the discussion by cerebrally stating that she got 0wned. If any one actually saw the show, it would be obvious that it was a technical issue, not an issue of lipsyncing.

If you watch the beginning, you'll notice it says "Broadcast from a previous live recording". All the acting is done live, but it's recorded before (just like late night shows).

Or at least that's what I assumed from what I read.

584796042[/snapback]

no ive watched a documentary on the show... its truely live

I'd hate to be the realist here but didn't she do "Pieces of Me" earlier in the show? The song on the SNL video is the begining to "Pieces of Me" (On a Monday and I'm waiting...) and I find it unlikely that she would do the same song twice, even if she is an one-hit wonder. You can even see her do a "WTF wince" when she hears the begining to "Pieces of Me" instead of whatever song she was going to actually sing. In a related topic, I'm a big fan of the groupthink displayed here, half the posts in this thread consists of some variation on the word "0wned"...it's like a l33t-speak feeding frenzy. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if some people didn't even see the video, they just saw "0wned" in a couple of posts, read the topic title ("Ashlee Simpson caught LIPSYNCHING on SNL" isn't entirely objective), and they decided to add to the discussion by cerebrally stating that she got 0wned. If any one actually saw the show, it would be obvious that it was a technical issue, not an issue of lipsyncing.

584796216[/snapback]

Ok so the SNL guys screwed up with the sound. Oh wait. What were they playing incorrectly? A recording of her voice for her to synchronize her lips with.

Nobody is blaming lil' Ashlee; however, it's now clear that she really does have no talent.

Around here, in Portugal, I have NEVER seen a professional artist sing live on a TvShow. They always do that lipsync crap.

I once went to an Award Show for some radio station, and I (and everyone for that matter) could clearly notice that the band' instruments weren't even pluged-in anywhere. There were absolutely no wires whatsoever on stage. Blah... so ****ing fake. :angry:

ps: I'd still pork her too :yes:

Well she didnt sing after the technical problem, whether new or not, its her song [Or the songwriters] and she's payed to perform. And that was a really silly dance just before her voice came out. The band did the proper thing and continued playing, she could at least just stand there and go through it all. Joe Satriani did that once only his equipment wasnt properly plugged in, but he stood there anyway.

LOL not at her but all of you... If any of you bothered to watch the whole show.. you would have caught on to the fact that the music in her second performance just happed to be the same song from her first performance.. and if you saw the first performance.. the vocals are supposed to sound like 2 of her singing and to get that effect in a live performance on a show like that you play a track while the singer sings the same track. In a studio the artist would record the track once then sing with it during playback while recording the second track, also having the first track on a slight time delay. Makes for a nice effect.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!