Dell UltraSharp 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD


Recommended Posts

Btw, a great resolution to run at if you can't run the game in widescreen is 1400x1050. You'll just have small bars on the sides and nothing on top or bottom. Might have to edit a game's files for it (sometimes), but it works pretty well in the odd case where you can't run 1680x1050 in the game for whatever reason.

After reading this topic for weeks now, I order mine because my old CRT whats to see old manitu soon.

Well one box, everything stored in there, nothing what was impressive yet.

After I put it on my table, I reallly realized how big a CRT could be and how much space I now have left on my table - this is just amazing!

The first difference is, you have so much space on the desktop, it is like "I don't know what to put there and there...and there!"

First I had to try and because I am really addicted to it at the moment: World of Warcraft. I moved all the sliders in den Options of the game and the driver dialog to maximum.

What I saw, was just :woot: Absolutly!

It is like sitting in the cinema in the first row, right in front the screen, but with the differents, it is not only big, but sharp und colorfull aswell. Amazing.

Because I use Photoshop often, I didn't try that on this screen yet and I have to try and see Half-Life 2 and some mods like DoD.

Never want to switch to something that is smaller than this lovely piece of technic :D

After reading this topic for weeks now, I order mine because my old CRT whats to see old manitu soon.

Well one box, everything stored in there, nothing what was impressive yet.

After I put it on my table, I reallly realized how big a CRT could be and how much space I now have left on my table - this is just amazing!

The first difference is, you have so much space on the desktop, it is like "I don't know what to put there and there...and there!"

First I had to try and because I am really addicted to it at the moment: World of Warcraft. I moved all the sliders in den Options of the game and the driver dialog to maximum.

What I saw, was just :woot: Absolutly!

It is like sitting in the cinema in the first row, right in front the screen, but with the differents, it is not only big, but sharp und colorfull aswell. Amazing.

Because I use Photoshop often, I didn't try that on this screen yet and I have to try and see Half-Life 2 and some mods like DoD.

Never want to switch to something that is smaller than this lovely piece of technic :D

586003784[/snapback]

Heh cool :D Mine is being delivered today between 5pm and 9pm! (its 1:50pm now) argh wish it would hurry up. :p

Tomorrow between 5pm and 9pm for my delivery.... it'll be sitting next to a 19" Viewsonic that now gets to become my second monitor!

Mate got his last week though and I went to see it on Saturday. Within 15 minutes of getting there and gaming, vid watching + other tests, I'd bought the fella online. Can't wait to get my hands on it....

I have a question about the 2005fpw's scaling settings.

The monitor has 3 scaling options: 1:1, Fill, and Aspect.

According to Dell's product support website for the 2005fpw

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/moni...ing%20the%20OSD

The aspect ratio setting "Increases Vertical image size to fit screen and adjusts Horizontal size to maintain proportional image."

The 2005fpw isn't truly Widescreen - its native aspect ratio is 16:10, not 16:9. Therefore, what happens when I input a 16:9 signal (such as 1280x720) using the Aspect scaling setting? If the image is stretched vertically to fit the screen, how can the 2005fpw adjust the horizontal size to maintain a proportional image? Does the 2005fpw simply cut off the left and right edges of the image, sacrificing more than 10% of the picture?

Of course, intuition would suggest that when a 16:9 signal is sent to a 2005fpw, the monitor should increase the horizontal image size to fit the screen, while adjusting the vertical size to maintain a proportional image (assuming scaling is set to Aspect). Dell's product documentation, however, contradicts this assessment.

I'm considering the 2005fpw, in part, because I want a monitor that can display a 720p High Definition signal (from VGA or DVI, of course) with a widescreen aspect ratio. The other 2 scaling options are undesirable, as 1:1 results in black bars covering nearly half of the monitor's area, and Fill results in a distorted, softened picture. Typical LCD monitors with a 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio provide too small a picture when set to maintain a widescreen aspect ratio of a 720p signal.

I'm hoping Dell's product documentation is inaccurate, and I would appreciate any knowledge 2005fpw owners can offer about how the monitor handles a 16:9 picture when set to maintain Aspect ratio.

I have a question about the 2005fpw's scaling settings.

The monitor has 3 scaling options: 1:1, Fill, and Aspect.

According to Dell's product support website for the 2005fpw

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/moni...ing%20the%20OSD

The aspect ratio setting "Increases Vertical image size to fit screen and adjusts Horizontal size to maintain proportional image."

The 2005fpw isn't truly Widescreen - its native aspect ratio is 16:10, not 16:9.  Therefore, what happens when I input a 16:9 signal (such as 1280x720) using the Aspect scaling setting?  If the image is stretched vertically to fit the screen, how can the 2005fpw adjust the horizontal size to maintain a proportional image?  Does the 2005fpw simply cut off the left and right edges of the image, sacrificing more than 10% of the picture?

Of course, intuition would suggest that when a 16:9 signal is sent to a 2005fpw, the monitor should increase the horizontal image size to fit the screen, while adjusting the vertical size to maintain a proportional image (assuming scaling is set to Aspect).  Dell's product documentation, however, contradicts this assessment.

I'm considering the 2005fpw, in part, because I want a monitor that can display a 720p High Definition signal (from VGA or DVI, of course) with a widescreen aspect ratio.  The other 2 scaling options are undesirable, as 1:1 results in black bars covering nearly half of the monitor's area, and Fill results in a distorted, softened picture.  Typical LCD monitors with a 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio provide too small a picture when set to maintain a widescreen aspect ratio of a 720p signal.

I'm hoping Dell's product documentation is inaccurate, and I would appreciate any knowledge 2005fpw owners can offer about how the monitor handles a 16:9 picture when set to maintain Aspect ratio.

586028365[/snapback]

aspect keeps the aspect ratio in check, so if youre playing Xbox360 with 720p, it will basically stretch the image until it hits the sides of the screens (while maintaining the aspect ratio of course), and there will be black bars on the top and bottom.

Fill means it will fill up the WHOLE screen, it will stretch it as much as it needs to, both horizontally and vertically, this will result in a distorted image. If youre doing 720p it means the picture will be elongated to strech to the top and bottom of the screen.

1:1 means youre getting exactly 1280x720 pixels, which means a much smaller black box than 1680x1050 native resolution.

I have a question about the 2005fpw's scaling settings.

The monitor has 3 scaling options: 1:1, Fill, and Aspect.

etc etc

586028365[/snapback]

Aspect = stretched with black bars to maintain aspect ratio

There's nothing contradictory, it stretches the image until either the sides or the top/bottom hit the edge of the screen, anything not filled in has black bars.

Any ratio wider than 16:10 (e.g. 16:9) has black bars on the top and bottom, any ratio narrower (e.g. 4:3) will have black bars on the sides.

Just got mine for $430 USD Shipped.

I don't know what to think of it. It's sexy for sure, but.... i don't know if it's big enough?

I just sold my 19" BenQ 937s for this, and that was a BEAUTIFUL monitor. I'm not sure if I should feel down for doing that or not. The 19" looked a lot bigger. The Dell has higher resolution, so it looks very slick, but then again, the BenQ wasn't all that bad either.

I've only had it for a couple of hours, maybe I'll get used to it and fall more in love with it once I start playing around more.

Now... someone link me to a good website where you can get nice widescreen desktop wallpapers.

Thanks

:ninja:

Aww, my 17" CRT just died... I was expecting to get a 2005FPW after I move house, but I guess that isn't happening... I go to the Dell site and it seems to be that the 2005FPW have 16ms response time. I read somewhere in this thread where something like "Grey on grey has 12ms reponse time, black on black has 16ms response time" what is that supposed to mean? Will I be able to pick on up from Dell in Australia with 12ms?

Thanks

I just received mine a few weeks ago, May 05 Rev02 w/ no dead/stuck pixels or backlight issues so I was very happy. However, I have recently noticed another problem that I haven't seen anyone else have: I get scrolling lines on the left side of the monitor about 2 inches long and moving from top to bottomthat appear to be "behind" the screen. They seem almost like interference or AC hum bars but I'm almost sure they are not. I have tried 2 seperate battery backups, an AC line noise filter, two different power supplies, three different video cards, a completely different computer, and a $100 Monster DVI cable. The problem only appears when using the DVI connection when connected to either my X850XT or 6800GT, but DOES NOT appear when connected through DVI to my GeForce Ti 4600. When connected through the D-Sub cable the problem dissapears completely, which seems very odd to me. I have tried everything I can think of, but does anyone have any more ideas? I've had the monitor for 2 weeks so I'll try for a replacement, but I like this one so hopefully I can fix the problem somehow. Are there any tweaks for vertical or horizontal refresh rates perhaps? I cannot for the life of me figure out what is going on...

Aww, my 17" CRT just died... I was expecting to get a 2005FPW after I move house, but I guess that isn't happening... I go to the Dell site and it seems to be that the 2005FPW have 16ms response time. I read somewhere in this thread where something like "Grey on grey has 12ms reponse time, black on black has 16ms response time" what is that supposed to mean? Will I be able to pick on up from Dell in Australia with 12ms?

Thanks

586033934[/snapback]

What the quoted response times there mean are that for a single pixel to go from black - fully off, to colour, and back to black again it takes 16ms. Durning normal use tho most pixels are not going fully off and on again, more like from a grey halftone shade to colour and back to keep up with whats being displayed.

They just give you that extra grey to grey of 12ms stats as some manfactures only quote that one trying to make their pannel sound better. There is only one version of the 2005FPW and that has a true 16ms response time.

I've had mine since Janurary this year and have found it amazing in everything I have tried with it. Not a bad word to say about it.

Hope that clears it up for you.

Nick

Thanks, Nick, for that response, it certainly cleared everything up for me. haha

So, there's no problems with ghosting or anything?

586034807[/snapback]

No problems mate, glad to be of help.

Certainly no ghosting, that I've seen. I have got 1 dead pixel, stuck on grey, but it's just on the top edge of the task bar about 2inches in from the bottom left - so I never see it. I know I could send it back, and may well do if any more occur, but for now it's fine without any hassle.

Got for it, you know you want one :yes:

Nick

No problems mate, glad to be of help.

Certainly no ghosting, that I've seen. I have got 1 dead pixel, stuck on grey, but it's just on the top edge of the task bar about 2inches in from the bottom left - so I never see it. I know I could send it back, and may well do if any more occur, but for now it's fine without any hassle.

Got for it, you know you want one  :yes:

Nick

586037170[/snapback]

no ghosting that you can see if you're just playing normal speed games. Load up Half Life or any other game and move the mouse REAL fast, you'll see ghosting. But then again, not often do you move that mouse THAT fast to notice it. can't wait for battle field 2 to come out. that will tell tails

No problems mate, glad to be of help.

Certainly no ghosting, that I've seen. I have got 1 dead pixel, stuck on grey, but it's just on the top edge of the task bar about 2inches in from the bottom left - so I never see it. I know I could send it back, and may well do if any more occur, but for now it's fine without any hassle.

Got for it, you know you want one  :yes:

Nick

586037170[/snapback]

Sweet, I am going for one. This old CRT is so damn blurry. Thanks for the info :D

I have got 1 dead pixel, stuck on grey, but it's just on the top edge of the task bar about 2inches in from the bottom left - so I never see it.

I know I could send it back, [...]

586037170[/snapback]

I was wondering: can you really send the monitor back 'cause of one faulty pixel? First time I hear that.

I was wondering: can you really send the monitor back 'cause of one faulty pixel? First time I hear that.

586051091[/snapback]

just say you are unsatisfied with the monitor. under dell's "total satisfaction policy" they must take it back.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple has clarified Series 9 was left off the watchOS 27 compatibility list by mistake.
    • Signal accuses UK government of using child safety as cover for mass surveillance by David Uzondu Recently, the UK's Home Office announced a sweeping set of proposals to make Britain the "first country in the world" where children cannot share or view nude photos on their smart devices, an initiative that authorities claim will protect children from online predators and combat pornography. In response, Signal believes that while the government must keep children "safe" and "protected," it should do so through social services and education, not by "surveillance, funding cuts, and cover-ups." The company called the plan "dystopian" and warned that it violates everyone's fundamental right to privacy, arguing that scanning on the presumption of nudity will only strengthen the market dominance and data control of giant corporations like Apple and Google. The statement continues by accusing the government of hiding its true intentions under the guise of child safety. Signal argues that the Home Office is building an invisible surveillance infrastructure that remains ripe for exploitation by future administrations and authoritarian regimes. According to the company, this aggressive approach completely ignores the actual needs of young people, such as properly funded schools and mental health services. Tech companies like Apple and Google have a three-month window to implement these mandatory device-level filters across the United Kingdom. If these tech firms refuse to comply with the mandate, the government will pass emergency legislation to force them to comply, threatening massive fines and even going after the CEOs of these companies with criminal charges. The technology will work by blocking explicit images directly on the operating system of all smartphones and tablets by default. This system monitors the device camera and third-party apps to intercept nudity before anyone can upload or send the image. Adults can still view explicit content, but only after completing a strict age verification check to unlock their devices. Several bodies like the NSPCC and Barnardo's praised the Home Office's decision, arguing that device-level intervention stops the cycle of grooming before it starts. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also supported the policy, claiming that tech companies can implement on-device checks "without threatening privacy or collecting any data."
    • Did you watch the keynote? It is way beyond what is described in this article. Looks interesting. Now it is time for them to deliver unlike what happened in 24.
    • It pretty much has to be compatible with MS Office or it is going nowhere. The rest of the world runs office including Europe. If it is not compatible it will not survive.
    • Incredible deal gets you free NVMe 512GB SSD with AMD AM5 B850 motherboard for only $150 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week we covered the story of an interesting PC case wherein you can build two full-size computers inside it as in it can house and run an AMD and an Intel system simultaneously. Speaking of building PCs, these are hard times to make one for sure as prices are often very high except during flash sales or discounts. If you are in the market for a 1080p gaming PC then Nvidia's 8GB RTX 5060 Ti is currently on sale for just $330 and you get the latest James Bond game too, for free. Speaking of which, right now there is another incredible sale going on as we can get a free 512 GB NVMe SSD from TeamGroup in the form of the G50 alongside the purchase of an AMD B850 socket AM5 motherboard for only $150 (purchase link under the specs table down below). Getting an AM5 motherboard now in 2026 will be a wise investment for sure, especially since AMD confirmed its commitment to support the socket till at least 2029. The MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI is a micro-ATX motherboard that is compatible with AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors. Since it is AM5, the motherboard works with DDR5 memory and includes MSI’s Memory Boost technology, along with EXPO and XMP support. Connectivity features include built-in Wi-Fi 7 paired with a 5G LAN solution. The board offers a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot with MSI’s EZ M.2 Shield Frozr II thermal solution, that is said to help maintain SSD performance by providing ample cooling against overheating. The technical specifications of the MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI motherboard are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor Micro-ATX (mATX), 243.84 × 243.84 mm Chipset AMD B850 Socket AM5 Supported Processors AMD Ryzen 9000, 8000, and 7000 Series Desktop Processors Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Max Memory 256 GB Memory Speed DDR5 8200–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Display Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 (up to 4K 60Hz) 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (up to 4K 60Hz) PCIe Slots 1 × PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) 3 × PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) Audio Codec Realtek ALC897 Audio Channels 7.1-Channel High Definition Audio M.2 Slots 3 × M.2 slots M.2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_2: PCIe 4.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset) M.2 Device Sizes M.2_1: 2280/2260 M.2_2: 2280/2260 M.2_3: 2280 SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support SATA: RAID 0, 1, 10 NVMe: RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 2 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126VB 5Gb Ethernet Wireless Networking Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Tri-band 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz MU-MIMO, MLO, 4KQAM Up to 2.9Gbps Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 1 × CPU Power 1 × PCIe Power (8-pin) Cooling Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan/Pump 3 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable RGB Gen2 (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Additional Internal Headers 2 × Front Panel (JFP) 1 × Chassis Intrusion (JCI) 1 × Front Audio (JAUD) 1 × COM Port (JCOM) 1 × JDASH Tuning Controller 1 × TPM 2.0 Header The free TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe SSD is a PCIe Gen4 and as such it promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 5,000 MB/s, helping accelerate game loading, file transfers, and everyday computing tasks. The SSD features an InnoGrit controller and SLC caching technology to support consistent performance. An ultra-thin, patented graphene heatsink is included to aid in heat dissipation. The NAND flash is based on TLC which means it has plenty of endurance up its sleeve. The random performance may not be as amazing as other drives with DRAM though. Still it should be very good since it can access system memory via HMB to use it as its DRAM cache. The technical specifications of the TeamGroup 512GB G50 NVMe SSD are given in the table below: Specification Value Model / Part Number TM8FFE512G0C129 Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen4x4 with NVMe Sequential Read Speed Up to 5,000 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 2,500 MB/s Endurance (TBW) 325 TBW DRAM Cache No Cache Technology SLC Cache Controller InnoGrit Controller Solution Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Weight 7 g Dimensions 80.0 × 22.0 × 3.7 mm Vibration Resistance 80 Hz ~ 2,000 Hz / 20G Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5 ms MTBF 3,000,000 hours Get it at the link below: MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI AM5 AMD motherboard + Team Group T-FORCE G50 TM8FFE512G0C129 512GB SSD (free gift): $149.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) This Newegg deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      226
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!