Recommended Posts

My PVE Retri gear is gonna see some mad increases, at present im at 1850AP / 25.4% crit unbuffed. Can see it reaching 2k Ap easily with some gear swaps, and with the 3% crit increase coming im gonna balance my gear down so im at the 25% (dont care for 28% crit) and use the off set crit to boost ap and hit rating up.

At mo im threat capping like a freak when I go ret for anything be it Kara or 5 mans, so its gonna be nice to be able to push my full dps cycle without "You Have Aggro" flashin up all the time and having to use my bubble as a **** aggro reset.

PIMP MY RET PALLY!!

Btw if you have a retadin then http://cromfel.battlefield.fi is your safe haven :)

Thanks for the heads up! :)

As with any large patch to any game there is always bugs and probs. Even when tested on a PTR there are many more things that come out of the woodwork cme patch day when its applied to live servers.

Theres only ever half a dozen PTR servers compared to about 100 live servers. A PTR will see maybe a few thousand people play on it, whilst yet again on the live servers your talking maybe a few million.

Personally 2.3 has been good so far to me, lags been fine, got my ui working reasonably well and grabbed some new gears etc.

However I do share the pain, Im unable to vendor anything in stacks of more than 1, meaning I have to split stacks of say Netherweave cloth up into 1 piece at a time and vendor it that way. Its really annoying when u have 5 20stacks. Sadly its not caused by my addons instead seems to be a bug affecting people, hopefully with a hot fix coming soon.

But hey its to be expected, these things always happen with patches. In any game!

Count yourself lucky guys, I woke up this morning fired up the PC played Crysis for 5 mins then my gfx card thats only 4months old packed in, cant play wow, cant play nowt.

No ZA / SSC / 5 man nothing all i get is a bsod after about 10mins playtime

Apparently the bear mount is a 100% chance to drop from the 4th chest in the timed event so knowing that we're going to have a go at it this week. Give the time to clear (2 hours), the quality of rewards (tier-5 iLevel but very well itemized) and the badges/hour ratio (better than farming heroics, and more fun than karazhan) its a good way to kill an off-night.

You also make pretty good coin in there. I'd estimate I made about 50-60g for the full clear + shards/dust

That doesn't sound right. ?I'd assume it's the same drop rate as the ZG Raptor/Tiget mounts and the Karazahn horse. ?The only difference is that you get more than 1 chance at it dropping in a given instance. ?(A guildy got it from a vase)

I'll have to check tomorrow if they've done a full timed run though.

Season 3 starts today :). My alt is finally going to become my main once I get enough honor for some gear.

What guild are you in adamb10?

My raiding guild was <Sold Out> on arthas/mal'ganis, if you scroll down here our the kill dates for us: http://www.so-guild.com/pages/information.php. We did end up killing Kel'thuzad but TBC ended our reign and we decided to go casual. Now I'm back to my horde characters which i started in 2004 :p

As of recently I've been guild hoping. :p The first 3 guilds I was in when I first hit 70 disbanded so I hopped over to Critalin which at the time was attemping to kill Kael. Right now there in BT, there on teron gorefiend I think. I left because my gear wasnt good enough for SSC at the time. I've been in crappy guilds since then but now I found a new guild I like.

The progression on my server sucks(hakkar) as no one on it has killed Illidian yet and only recently has the horde ventured in BT. The guild is "reign", we just started trying to kill the loot reaver in TK on sunday(got it down to 60%), raiding gruuls tonight. :)

BTW yeah thats Bartender 3 in the screenshots.

Edited by Adamb10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!