Recommended Posts

I'm surprised they have not already given it a graphics overhaul considering its 3 years old and other MMO's like EVE and Second Life are improving there engines. Afterall it is a Subscription and if they bumped the graphics they could get a few more eye-candy seekers.

I'm happy to keep playing as it is however. I love the Art Style and for me that makes up for the low poly counts even if I am running with a wasted 8800GTX lol

Indeed you do. While I like the art style. They could do with bumping up the polly counts on mobs as well as bosses and improve the textures.

And risk the chance that some of the millions of people that play the game and are happy with the game, might suddenly find that their system can't support new gee-whiz-neato graphics updates? Yeah, good plan.

And risk the chance that some of the millions of people that play the game and are happy with the game, might suddenly find that their system can't support new gee-whiz-neato graphics updates? Yeah, good plan.

With EVE people can use both game engines at once on the same servers.

So older generation computer owners can run the older engine and play with people running the newer engine which has updated graphics. Blizzard could do the same thing by updating the client engine. In reality the clients only send information back its not like the engine being used to view that content will screw with someone elses perception of what the server is telling there client. Just like viewing a website with many different browsers. As Blizzard would be the ones making all the clients they know what to expect and like EVE can program for any oddities between client traffic.

So yes it is a good plan.

And risk the chance that some of the millions of people that play the game and are happy with the game, might suddenly find that their system can't support new gee-whiz-neato graphics updates? Yeah, good plan.

How about a new graphical setting called...

VERY HIGH!

:rolleyes:

LotRO supports it (look at their super rez textures) why blizzard can't I don't know.

WoTLK is getting a graphics improvement but I agree that something should be done. Like an above poster said, maybe have a very high setting(and give a warning for all the idiots that try it on there old pc's).

God why is eveyone obsessed with graphics. Wow looks the way it does as thats the intened graphical "style" of hte game its not meant to be a photo realistic effort.

Id rather we had a whole load of new content than a new set of high res textures or some mince like that. Which btw would probs increase wow`s hdd usage up a few gigabytes and in turn again mean some folk wouldnt / couldnt install it.

The sparkle of pretty gfx is only the first thing you go to in a game when ur gettin into it, for a few days u,ll be impressed then the novelty wears off as you get deeper into the gameplay at which point ur either hooked or realised youve bought a turd.

Yeah because good graphics and a good game are mutually exclusive....not!

I agree with you that pretty graphics alone do not make for a good game, but WoW has long established a formulae for a sucessful MMO experience and game.

It would be naive to think that future gamers are going to continue to choose WoW over some of the impressive MMOs emerging next year especially when newer games can easily replicate this formula whilst offering ever increasing options for the player coupled with the graphics.

I'm also pretty confident the number of users who could afford the extra HDD space for graphical improvements would vastly outweigh those who do not.

The sparkle of pretty gfx is only the first thing you go to in a game when ur gettin into it, for a few days u,ll be impressed then the novelty wears off as you get deeper into the gameplay at which point ur either hooked or realised youve bought a turd.

What's that got to do with WoW?

Blizzard's idea is to have it the way it is.. so you can run it on a low end machine, high end machine, and mac etc..

Let me put this again:

You still have HIGH, but then you have a new setting called VERY HIGH.

No one looses out.

God why is eveyone obsessed with graphics. Wow looks the way it does as thats the intened graphical "style" of hte game its not meant to be a photo realistic effort.

I know, I've mentioned that before but the game looks like it's aging badly. Paper mario has a simplistic look to it. But it still the manages to have some great textures.

Id rather we had a whole load of new content than a new set of high res textures or some mince like that.

To make textures you only need the artists. For new content you need programmers, play testers, designers. Now why they can't fit that in to the schedual while the programmers are working on fixing the content I don't know.

Which btw would probs increase wow`s hdd usage up a few gigabytes and in turn again mean some folk wouldnt / couldnt install it.

Seriously if you can't afford a new HD you can't afford WoW.

What's that got to do with WoW?

What hasnt it? Didnt you look at screens of wow and think "man that looks colourful bright and fun, the enviroments are nice etc etc i think i might give it a go once i find out more about gameplay"

I know, I've mentioned that before but the game looks like it's aging badly. Paper mario has a simplistic look to it. But it still the manages to have some great textures.

Couldnt the same be said for WOW, or does the fact Blizz wont up poly counts on 3D models compared to a 2D/3D game that would see less improvement annoy you?

To make textures you only need the artists. For new content you need programmers, play testers, designers. Now why they can't fit that in to the schedual while the programmers are working on fixing the content I don't know.

All of which Blizz have in abundance, and you dont just need artists for textures they too have to be coded in and optimized before programmers knock up a new set of gfx options and other tweaks to match the new textures. I.e why have high res textures on low res models. Not to mention the sheer volume of textures theyd need to go ack and incrase dpi / resolution on.

Seriously if you can't afford a new HD you can't afford WoW.

Well example, I was unemplyed for 6months I got ?180 a month to cloth feed and look after myself. I literally was able to pay my sub and no more. If id had to upgrade an HDD just to play the latest patch then I would of been ****ed as ?30-40 is still a lot of money to some people.

Im soz but the game looks fine to me, I dont worry about how it looks when Im playing wow at all. Im too busy doing other stuff, and tbh in many ways im still impressed by some of the gfx and scenery. If you wanta bad time try running wow on all its lowest gfx settings as I have been for 3 weeks now after my gfx card packed in playing Crysis.

What hasnt it? Didnt you look at screens of wow and think "man that looks colourful bright and fun, the enviroments are nice etc etc i think i might give it a go once i find out more about gameplay"

No.

I originally though: "Man, this looks like tripe but I'll give it a shot." Thankfully it was worth it. I pre-ordered it and picked up a beta key.

Couldnt the same be said for WOW, or does the fact Blizz wont up poly counts on 3D models compared to a 2D/3D game that would see less improvement annoy you?

Missing my point but that's internet debate for you.

All of which Blizz have in abundance, and you dont just need artists for textures they too have to be coded in and optimized before programmers knock up a new set of gfx options and other tweaks to match the new textures. I.e why have high res textures on low res models. Not to mention the sheer volume of textures theyd need to go ack and incrase dpi / resolution on.

Granted I made it seem a little simple. But If Mythic (a small company at the time) can do it with DAoC so can Blizzard. They have an abundance of talent. It's not like they are putting it to good use at the moment anyway. The new dungeon was simply more of the same.

Well example, I was unemplyed for 6months I got ?180 a month to cloth feed and look after myself. I literally was able to pay my sub and no more. If id had to upgrade an HDD just to play the latest patch then I would of been ****ed as ?30-40 is still a lot of money to some people.

Should have spent less time playing and more looking for a new job tbh:/:/

Anyway as I said, LotRO makes it an OPTIONAL install as many people can't run the settings at a moderate framerate.

Im soz but the game looks fine to me, I dont worry about how it looks when Im playing wow at all. Im too busy doing other stuff, and tbh in many ways im still impressed by some of the gfx and scenery.

That's great for you. You may be easily impressed. But compare WoW to the future MMOs like Warhammer & Conan and guess which will catch the eye quicker.

And risk the chance that some of the millions of people that play the game and are happy with the game, might suddenly find that their system can't support new gee-whiz-neato graphics updates? Yeah, good plan.

I agree

Just look at the GFX overhaul between Everquest and EverquestII.

also Bliz would be loosing out on a massive potential in not releasing WOW 2 which would pretty much do the same thing ;)

AARRGGGHHHH

"Optional" install and setting!!! :)

PS.

I've just re subscribed :) woooooo

Can anyone reccommend any good mods/addons please :):):)

Nothing. There are so many trojans/keyloggers going around its ridiculous. There have been reports from various TRUSTED websites that some trojans even make it through. For example:

http://www.mmo-champion.com (Read about it there)

http://www.wowinterface.com/forums/showthr...?threadid=13868 (Here too)

No.

I originally though: "Man, this looks like tripe but I'll give it a shot." Thankfully it was worth it. I pre-ordered it and picked up a beta key.

And that is obviously where you amd I differ. I saw it thot, ooh that looks like a beefed up and interesting game based on the WC3 art style and universe this could be good.

Missing my point but that's internet debate for you.

Without sounded like some trivial 2 bit forum troll. I think you may have missed mine. Paper Mario is delibretly 2d and a bit nah looking to reflect the art direction and premise of the game. Wow hasnt had major graphic updates for the same reason. Its still meant to resemble the WC3 universe the one game that many (non hardcore or older PC gaming) fans remember i.e most recent release outside WOW for the game universe.

Granted I made it seem a little simple. But If Mythic (a small company at the time) can do it with DAoC so can Blizzard. They have an abundance of talent. It's not like they are putting it to good use at the moment anyway. The new dungeon was simply more of the same.

What works for one company cant always be applied to another. Yes Blizz is bigger and has more resources espec with this Activis deal. You say they arent putting it to good use and that the new dungeon seemed samey. Well what do you want improved graphics and the "same" dungeon formula, or no major graphic updates and new and interesting gameplay elements to combat these "samey" dungeons.

Should have spent less time playing and more looking for a new job tbh.

What gives you the right to make comments like that? Do you know my circumstances or the level to which I was playing WOW vs the time I spent job hunting? No. I work in a specialist field within the design industry which see`s many more applicants than job postings and finding work after losing long term employment proved to a be a bit of a pain in the backside.

And that is obviously where you amd I differ. I saw it thot, ooh that looks like a beefed up and interesting game based on the WC3 art style and universe this could be good.

I played WC3 once and found it immensely dull. That maybe why.

Paper Mario is delibretly 2d and a bit nah looking to reflect the art direction and premise of the game. Wow hasnt had major graphic updates for the same reason. Its still meant to resemble the WC3 universe the one game that many (non hardcore or older PC gaming) fans remember i.e most recent release outside WOW for the game universe.

It can still resemble the WC3 universe with a graphical update. Hell blizz can turn the lore how they like ('lol spaceship'). What's wrong with making something have a bit more candy.

Well what do you want improved graphics and the "same" dungeon formula, or no major graphic updates and new and interesting gameplay elements to combat these "samey" dungeons.

Artists aren't game designers. Yes they will likely have a look in but nothing more than 'proof reading' so to speak.

What gives you the right to make comments like that?

You brought it up. Don't bring it up if you don't want someone to comment. Obviously this is going no where so lets leave it at that.

Nothing. There are so many trojans/keyloggers going around its ridiculous. There have been reports from various TRUSTED websites that some trojans even make it through. For example:

http://www.mmo-champion.com (Read about it there)

http://www.wowinterface.com/forums/showthr...?threadid=13868 (Here too)

Woah there Captn' Kneejerk! It appears hackers have circumvented the servers where the addons are hosted (WoWInterface and the old ui.worldofwar.net). Stick to WoWace for the time being and download only the zips. Don't run anything that holds and .exe in it.

Those complaining about outdated grahpics should look at some of the screenshots of the next expansion. While it's not a complete overhaul, the textures being used are significantly higher resolution than those currently while still retaining the overall feel.

ss37-hires.jpg

ss33-hires.jpg

ss36-hires.jpg

ss39.jpg

ss40.jpg

Nothing revolutionary, but an improvment over what's in currently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!