Recommended Posts

are any of u aware.. that the textures in WoW are hand painted ?

They aren't. They are first done in drawings then sent to computer graphics people....Half the time the stuff they draw on paper doesn't make it into the game. You can see this by looking at concept art and comparing it to the stuff thats actually in the game.

War hammers game play doesn't compare to the complexity of WoWs. Its going to be hyped like Hellgate London then turn out to be just as bad.

Wow I didn't realise you were in the beta. Had seen the new podcasts and realised Blizz is copying the siege RvR system from Mythics game, DAoC, in to their new expansion. :sleep:

At the end of the day gfx updates its safe to say the majority of us will probs keep playing

Aye, well the case is there is simply nothing else out there that competes for the time being.

Edited by Spookie
Wow I didn't realise you were in the beta. Had seen the new podcasts and realised Blizz is copying the siege RvR system from Mythics game, DAoC, in to their new expansion. :sleep:

Grats on a Guild Wars UI with a WoW concept.

I'll stick to WoW, I don't want to waste my life re-leveling again.

Edited by gregb0b
One thing i thought was quite weird, it took around 25 minutes to install off the 5 CDs, yet it took about 3 seconds (literally) to uninstall, is that right? :/

File copy operations from optical discs to hard drives take a lot longer than file delete operations. And I think the files are compressed on the discs, so the decompression also takes some time.

with a WoW concept.

WoW your first MMO? They copied off everyone else. They even stole Everquests designer. :rolleyes:

Warhammer is a game which is all about city sieges and RvR. It doesn't focus on PvE like WoW. So really. They don't have much in common when it comes to end game.

But this thread is about WoW so lets leave that there shall we? I don't want to be pointing out every new gameplay mechanic for the next two weeks!

Ah, makes sense. I would have kept it but i don't think i want to lose ?110/yr to something i can't even touch:pp

Why wouldn't you be able to touch it?:huh::

At lvl 10 uve got about 1/10 of ur abilitys seen about 0.1% of the game and its enviroments, probs not even run the 1st dungeon, not done any pvp, barely fought what can be called a boss. Many players still wont have joined a guild, the quests will be simplistic at best. No real porgression of proffessions or skills, barely scratched the talent system.

Yes I like wow but your basing your opinion on what is literally maybe 1-2hrs gameplay max. I think its fair to say that if we all did that then god knows how many games would pass under our radar as not being any good.

Hell I remember when i 1st played Tekken, hated it at 1st as I couldnt do anything and the comp always beat me, even after a good week of owning the game i was still in that position, but i stuck it out and forced myself to see what the fuss was about, eventually i started getting somewhere and no apart from Soul Calibur its one of my fave beat em ups ever.

Have to say if your attitude to games is "if im not hooked by the time ive played the 1st level" then maybe games arent the best thing, or shud be looking at arcade games rather than anything thats got any real length to it, as in many cases devs leave the best to last or atleast past the 50/75% mark.

Meh, the guy is right.

I had 3 level 70's and It's the same **** all through the game, grinding! 1 to 10 and you've experienced the game, except a few crappy dungeons, some ingame pixel "Epic items" and the odd PvP.

( You can see i lost the "WoW Spark" a long time ago :laugh: )

1. Any1 can recommend a reliable addons site? I know not all sites can be trusted.

2. any recommended complete UI (for Rogue if that makes difference). I have seen many UIs but never tried any cause I am not sure if they are practical or not.

Well if those that want to disagree with me want to spend their time running through cyber worlds, attacking cyber animals and fighting with other people you go do that, i'm not. That's my opinion, i'm entitled to it so that is WHY i posted 'Chaos'

Period.

fair enough. obviously many people out there disagree and to each their opinion.

and thnx for quitting cause that helps make the waiting times for BGs a bit less :p

Meh, the guy is right.

I had 3 level 70's and It's the same **** all through the game, grinding! 1 to 10 and you've experienced the game, except a few crappy dungeons, some ingame pixel "Epic items" and the odd PvP.

( You can see i lost the "WoW Spark" a long time ago :laugh: )

+1. You have seen all the game has to offer at 10. Same run here run there quests, combat is the same regardless of what you are fighting and playing waaaaaaay too long to try and get something with an unrealistic drop rate.

Oh, and Warhammer has been around since 1987. So even though the concept of Orcs, Dwarves etc came from D&D, they aren't copying WoW in any way.

(Oh, and D&D was influenced by Tolkein who started it all I guess.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!