Recommended Posts

I just got called a Ninja Looter because I ran through Razorfin Downs with a group .. didn't get anything through the run, and needed an item I can use at 37, and I'm 32.

They were all saying "Ur blacklisted" and stupid stuff like that..

I mean wtf? The only thing I get during the run is XP and a few Bone Moss and they're *****ing because I need an item I can use in five levels?!

That's BS.

If you took the item without letting anyone/giving anyone a chance to roll for it and without prior warning to anyone then that is ninja looting.

I mean wtf? The only thing I get during the run is XP and a few Bone Moss and they're *****ing because I need an item I can use in five levels?!

5-levels below the zone you're not contributing anything to the run.

  • You'd be decimated by crushing blows if you tried to tank.
  • You'd be unable to hit enemies with spells or melee often enough to make an appreciable damage contribution.
  • The level-based threat difference will make you a questionably valuable healer.

It sounds like you being allowed to tag-along by higher level players with the expectation that they'd be collecting

all the loot. Maybe someone was gearing a twink, leveling an alt, or trying to level enchanting and you were

invited for the party experience bonus.

What class do you play, what was the item, and what were the classes/level of other people in the group?

If you took the item without letting anyone/giving anyone a chance to roll for it and without prior warning to anyone then that is ninja looting.

I did let someone else roll on it though.. that's just it..

5-levels below the zone you're not contributing anything to the run.

I wasn't 5 levels below the instance.. the ARMOR was 5 levels below my wearing capability, however, I did contribute a whole lot of help. I used over 400 ammo doing damage to mobs om the instance. I didn't ninja loot.

Yup.

Now before you say "40 you get mail, you did ninja loot." .. the other person got at least 2 blues during the run, and I didn't get squit.

I felt like I honestly deserved something for all the ammo I used and damage I put out.

I also, told them to need roll for it as well.. and they did.. They lost.

Edited by Andrew-DB
I wasn't 5 levels below the instance.. the ARMOR was 5 levels below my wearing capability

The gear that drops in a dungeon is reflective of the level range of the zone. If the gear is level ilevel 40-42 (requires Level 37), and every boss in the zone is level 37, and you're 32: you're well below the zone. When attacking mobs that much higher level than you, your miss chance is rediculous.

however, I did contribute a whole lot of help. I used over 400 ammo doing damage to mobs om the instance. I didn't ninja loot.

I'm sure you used a lot of ammunition: I'm also sure many of your shots didn't land, that your presence made things much more dangerous,

Knowing you play a hunter and you rolled on a piece of armor that required level 37 to equip that narrows the list of likely candidates to:

  • Boar Champions Belt which is Shaman, Warrior, ret-paladin gear. Hunter's would prefer the AH trash Blackforge Girdle or the Arathi Basin PVP reward.
  • Deathchill Armor which is Shaman/Paladin heal-bot gear. Hunter's should be doing the Arathi quest for the Blood-tinged Armor.

If it was either of those items I wouldn't say it was a ninja loot, but it was certainly clueless. They're also mail so I'm assuming those probably weren't the item (because you said you could equip the item at 37). That brings us to:

  • Bonefingers: Not even remotely good for you.
  • Arachnid Gloves of the Monkey: You could make a case for these, any of the other versions are not suitable for a hunter.
  • Fleshhide Shoulders: I can see making a reasonable claim on these.

Anything else would be pretty much ninja looting.

the other person got at least 2 blues during the run, and I didn't get squit.

Good for them, I'm glad that the dungeon was dropping gear somebody could use. The fact that someone else was lucky is irrelevant. Even if someone got 10 pieces of loot unfairly, you're still screwing over 3 other people.

I felt like I honestly deserved something for all the ammo I used and damage I put out.

For example: the experience and quest completion help? 5 levels below the content: your contribution is marginal at best. Even if you were top DPS: that's what you're supposed to do. Showing up and doing your job doesn't entitle you to anything but a chance to roll fairly on loot you can use.

I also, told them to need roll for it as well.. and they did.. They lost.

If you didn't plan to take the item unfairly, why would you roll need instead of greed?

The gear that drops in a dungeon is reflective of the level range of the zone. If the gear is level ilevel 40-42 (requires Level 37), and every boss in the zone is level 37, and you're 32: you're well below the zone. When attacking mobs that much higher level than you, your miss chance is rediculous.

I'm sure you used a lot of ammunition: I'm also sure many of your shots didn't land, that your presence made things much more dangerous,

Knowing you play a hunter and you rolled on a piece of armor that required level 37 to equip that narrows the list of likely candidates to:

  • Boar Champions Belt which is Shaman, Warrior, ret-paladin gear. Hunter's would prefer the AH trash Blackforge Girdle or the Arathi Basin PVP reward.
  • Deathchill Armor which is Shaman/Paladin heal-bot gear. Hunter's should be doing the Arathi quest for the Blood-tinged Armor.

If it was either of those items I wouldn't say it was a ninja loot, but it was certainly clueless. They're also mail so I'm assuming those probably weren't the item (because you said you could equip the item at 37). That brings us to:

  • Bonefingers: Not even remotely good for you.
  • Arachnid Gloves of the Monkey: You could make a case for these, any of the other versions are not suitable for a hunter.
  • Fleshhide Shoulders: I can see making a reasonable claim on these.

Anything else would be pretty much ninja looting.

Good for them, I'm glad that the dungeon was dropping gear somebody could use. The fact that someone else was lucky is irrelevant. Even if someone got 10 pieces of loot unfairly, you're still screwing over 3 other people.

For example: the experience and quest completion help? 5 levels below the content: your contribution is marginal at best. Even if you were top DPS: that's what you're supposed to do. Showing up and doing your job doesn't entitle you to anything but a chance to roll fairly on loot you can use.

If you didn't plan to take the item unfairly, why would you roll need instead of greed?

Tbh at that level gear is much more broadly used, people dont seek specific items as they level or least i dont as it gets replaced soon. Aslong as it carrys 2/3rd stats that are viable to me id use it.

But the argument of ninja looting and taking an item as u feel u deserve it is a bit ludicrous, imagine me in a 25man i get 2nd on dps meter fighting a boss. The loot drops and instead of everyone bidding, i get it as i put in enuff effort to get 2nd on dps.

Sadly it dont work like that, Wow is team game and being selfish isnt kool. How do you know if the hunter next to you used 600 arrows then hed be more deserving etc etc. It just dont make sense

just out of curiosity.

is buy WoW gold against the TOS?

Yes, the chances of you getting busted though are slim to none.

So many of my real-life friends and players I know In-game has purchased gold at least once while playing, not one of them have been banned, suspended or warned.

I do hope they work out a system to punish or detect players buying gold, because it's incredibly pathetic and annoying.

Talking about gold, I arranged to do a gold transfer from Horde to the Alliance side and asked on the Realm Forums if someone could help out. A guy stepped forward and agreed to do the trade between characters, not only did he hold true to his word, I got almost 400g extra just because he wasn't using his Horde character. Nice to see there are some decent people out there still :)

If it was either of those items I wouldn't say it was a ninja loot, but it was certainly clueless. They're also mail so I'm assuming those probably weren't the item (because you said you could equip the item at 37). That brings us to:

  • Bonefingers: Not even remotely good for you.
  • Arachnid Gloves of the Monkey: You could make a case for these, any of the other versions are not suitable for a hunter.
  • Fleshhide Shoulders: I can see making a reasonable claim on these.

First of all, great post. :)

Second, the ones I hit need on was Fleshhide Shoulders.

Quick question: Coming from FFXI, looting/casting lots on items was a little different. You either cast lots [rolled] or passed on an item in a party.

Having just started on WoW and being in my first group the other day, I discovered that it's different here. There's a 'roll', 'greed', or 'pass'. What's the difference between rolling and greed?

Having just started on WoW and being in my first group the other day, I discovered that it's different here. There's a 'roll', 'greed', or 'pass'. What's the difference between rolling and greed?

The first option (the dice) is "need", the gold icon is "greed", and the cross is "pass". ;)

I used over 400 ammo doing damage to mobs om the instance.

ROFLMFAO

sorry you are a hunter stop bitching about ammo and STOP ****ing ninja looting crap hunter have a bad name as is in the game

normally rolling need means you put it on RIGHT THERE not in a "few lvls"

IF the other person already has a couple pieces and I can use it and its good for me, I'll roll for it too. Now if its not an upgrade or its not good for my class i'll just greed and let whomever have it. In the end its a lvl 37 item and will be replaced in 3 or 4 lvls anyway so its not really a big deal.

@yggdr: The dice is for need, which means obviously you NEED it for your character. The coin is for GREED meaning its not an upgrade or its not good for you but you'll just sell it. The X is for passing which means you dont care about the item at all.

Second, the ones I hit need on was Fleshhide Shoulders.

Great. Then the only way you could have been dishonest is if you had entered into an agreement that somebody else gets first chance at drops.

That's the sort of detail you'd mention so it sounds like you ran across a whiney druid. Even at end-game hunters wear leather pieces because Blizzard just refuses to itemize mail properly.

Great. Then the only way you could have been dishonest is if you had entered into an agreement that somebody else gets first chance at drops.

That's the sort of detail you'd mention so it sounds like you ran across a whiney druid. Even at end-game hunters wear leather pieces because Blizzard just refuses to itemize mail properly.

Yup. I was laughing my *** off when they told me I was a Ninja Looter.

The first option (the dice) is "need", the gold icon is "greed", and the cross is "pass". ;)

I knew that much, what I meant is... what's the difference between clicking need versus greed? How does it work?

I knew that much, what I meant is... what's the difference between clicking need versus greed? How does it work?

Exactly how it sounds. Need > greed. If everyone hits greed, and one person hits need. That one person gets it. Don't see how else to explain it, thought it would be easy to understand.

Need, you need it for upgrade.

Greed, you want it, but don't need it.

I mean, do you not get it? Its' one of the first things I picked up when playing, and one of things when I was noob I didn't need explained to me. Need > greed. Need if you need it, greed if you want it but don't need it.

I knew that much, what I meant is... what's the difference between clicking need versus greed? How does it work?

Ah, sorry I see now what you meant. I was in a hurry when I posted.

Slane had it right. Need > greed. If 4 roll greed one rolls need, the one rolling need wins by default. If more than one rolls w/e highest roll etc.

http://www.vimeo.com/1366644?pg=embed&...366644&hd=1

The Last Death Knight Quest in the starting chain from the starting area of the DK. Sorry for the slow fps at some poitns and bad editing/music :) anyways should be fun to watch.

The reason why i have 35k hp and hit for like 10k is you get a buff while doing that quest that increases your stats and damage. :) This is from WotLK beta.

http://www.vimeo.com/1367838

Dk play vid from beta NO DOWNtime on even con mobs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!