Recommended Posts

You do know Armory is an official part of World of Warcraft?

Here's the EU site; http://armory.wow-europe.com/index.xml

You don't even have to log in, you can just search for your character and link it from there.

Sorry, just being cautious. :)

Anyway, here's the link: http://armory.wow-europe.com/character-she...&n=Ethernet

whats the benefits of installing burning crusade in the early stages of the game? i'm only lvl 15 at the moment. i was in town over the weekend so i thought i'd buy it for future use...

i believe the real benefit is the advance from level 60 to 70... but since i'm way off, and will be for along time, should i wait?

whats the benefits of installing burning crusade in the early stages of the game? i'm only lvl 15 at the moment. i was in town over the weekend so i thought i'd buy it for future use...

i believe the real benefit is the advance from level 60 to 70... but since i'm way off, and will be for along time, should i wait?

Install it. Well, don't if you don't have free space. But there is no other reason why you shouldn't install it.

Sorry, just being cautious. :)

Anyway, here's the link: http://armory.wow-europe.com/character-she...&n=Ethernet

You claim you haven't played in over a year, yet you logged in 2 months ago.

The gear looks junky though, you do have some nice reputation in desirable factions though.

If it were me, and the Warrior was on a seperate account i'd sell it for $70-90, so 51-66 Euro?

The reputation drake is nice, but you're barely out of blues.

Now, off topic:

The way you are going about this, leads me to believe you bought that account if you do not know about WoWArmory, yet it shows you have been active in the last 2 months and you are 70.

And the terminology you used to describe the account, "(Has elite flying mount including dragon)" sounds like e-bay.

You would think after grinding that reputation mindlessly for a month or two you'd notice that it is called "Netherwing Drake"/"Netherwing" reputation, it is no easy thing to overcome in that gear to grind out completely exalted with Netherwing.

You'd be surprised at how oblivious people can be as well as how lucky. I've seen a guy running around with a piece of t6, and almost all greens. He told me he didn't know where he got the piece and said he had friends in a "higher guild that kills guys."

You'd be surprised at how oblivious people can be as well as how lucky. I've seen a guy running around with a piece of t6, and almost all greens. He told me he didn't know where he got the piece and said he had friends in a "higher guild that kills guys."

hahahaha

my guild kills guys too!

hahahaha

my guild kills guys too!

It was like a slap in the face, really.

Some poor chum running around aimlessly gets dragged into a relatively easy fight, like Azgalor, rolls on the gloves and for whatever reason wins. It makes me mad almost that good things happen to undeserving people, haha. I've downed Azgalor a bunch of times, yet I'm still in my t5 gloves. I'd bet the guy never even had t5, or t4 gloves for that matter!

Ah well, to each his own.

You'd be surprised at how oblivious people can be as well as how lucky. I've seen a guy running around with a piece of t6, and almost all greens. He told me he didn't know where he got the piece and said he had friends in a "higher guild that kills guys."

When we start seeing this, is when we know an expansion is coming soon. (WotLK Nov.13, as you know.)

I would see the same thing Pre-BC about a month or two before it is actually released.

People running around with T2 chest off Nef, and the rest completely greens, same story "Yeah my friend's guild needed help, so I got some loot that i'm not even sure what it does." Not in they're own words of course.

But I mean come on... Specifically flying over to the remote Netherwing isle in the corner of SMV to do dailies without even knowing what you are grinding / grinding for? It just sounds too... Unreal.

Crappy screenshot of the twins after we killed Felmyst the first time(which I was not present for the kill and prolly never will be).

I see you haven't downed the ledge boss ;)

Twins will stay a fairly hard encounter in 3.0: 90% of their damage is magic based, and for the most part it's either "fix it now or you die".

30% less health means much fewwer conflags and healing will be easier, but reverse strategy should at least have the same feeling. It's such a boring encounter when you use the reverse strategy, hopefully you'll be able to get past it quickly and see see M'uru while he's still fun.

I've downed Azgalor a bunch of times, yet I'm still in my t5 gloves. I'd bet the guy never even had t5, or t4 gloves for that matter!

For my chest slot, I went form level 58 blues, to AQ40 spell damage gear. After giving up on getting any healing gear I level tailoring.

I wore that level 58 epic until I had cleared Karazhan and Killed Magtheridon. I leveled tailoring to cap so I wasn't completely out-of-date.

We were farming Illidan before I got Tier 4 (and I picked up Tier 6 the day I gemmed Tier 4).

I lucked out and got the Sunwell pattern a few weeks ago so I guess I'm pretty much set until Tier 9.

If it weren't for crafting, I'd have worn a level 58 PVP reward until we killed Satura, and then I'd have worn

that for for weeks of Illidan farming. Another priest in my guild wore his Tier 2 robes just as long, meanwhile

mages had 2 or more full sets of Tier 4, 5 and 6.

The ledge boss owned us twice. Somebody falling off the ledge accidentially and pulling twins, not fun. We're doing the reverse strat where you kill sacrolash first I think(because it's the easiest) and from watching a video it doesnt seen that hard. Then again watching a video and actually doing the encounter are 2 different things.

For my chest slot, I went form level 58 blues, to AQ40 spell damage gear. After giving up on getting any healing gear I level tailoring.

I wore that level 58 epic until I had cleared Karazhan and Killed Magtheridon. I leveled tailoring to cap so I wasn't completely out-of-date.

We were farming Illidan before I got Tier 4 (and I picked up Tier 6 the day I gemmed Tier 4).

I lucked out and got the Sunwell pattern a few weeks ago so I guess I'm pretty much set until Tier 9.

If it weren't for crafting, I'd have worn a level 58 PVP reward until we killed Satura, and then I'd have worn

that for for weeks of Illidan farming. Another priest in my guild wore his Tier 2 robes just as long, meanwhile

mages had 2 or more full sets of Tier 4, 5 and 6.

AKA, Random is random. :p

The ledge boss owned us twice. Somebody falling off the ledge accidentially and pulling twins, not fun. We're doing the reverse strat where you kill sacrolash first I think(because it's the easiest) and from watching a video it doesnt seen that hard. Then again watching a video and actually doing the encounter are 2 different things.

Using the reverse strategy turns it into Barron Gheddon round 2. Assuming your healers aren't AFK and you have an appropriate number then you move all of the difficult work on to your tanks who are probably used to carrying the raid by this point.

The only skill required is "run away when you're going to kill everyone" and "don't fail at the ledge boss".

I'm not really sure if the reverse strategy is intended or not. The nonsense required to position correctly is pretty dumb, it makes the fight ridiculously easy for its place in progression, and it depends on a 'pathing exploit' to work. On the other hand: Firemaw (? the first drake in BWL) was one big LOS game and I don't think there was any other strategy used to kill him.

Instructor had a bit of an line-of-sight/range component but it was more of a "run away every 30 seconds" thing, rather than cheesing the whole fight with it.

I'm also reasonably convinced that the "run around in a field not standing in a fire" strategy wasn't the expected way to do Archimonde but I've never been able to get my hands on a cleared instance to try it.

You claim you haven't played in over a year, yet you logged in 2 months ago.

Now, off topic:

The way you are going about this, leads me to believe you bought that account if you do not know about WoWArmory, yet it shows you have been active in the last 2 months and you are 70.

And the terminology you used to describe the account, "(Has elite flying mount including dragon)" sounds like e-bay.

You would think after grinding that reputation mindlessly for a month or two you'd notice that it is called "Netherwing Drake"/"Netherwing" reputation, it is no easy thing to overcome in that gear to grind out completely exalted with Netherwing.

Yes, it's my account. I stopped playing it just over a year ago when I hit lvl 70 and done all the sinlge quests I could find, I just simply didn't have time for the group quests that last hours. I then let my eldest kid take over and have some fun (aswell as spunk all the gold I earnt along the way!).

how do i send 1 of them global messages or whatever they are?

they appear in red...

i got one the other day, someone asking if anyone wanted to help with a quest, i replied, and he invited me to group... but we were miles away, met up, and completed the quest..

how can i send those messages?

how do i send 1 of them global messages or whatever they are?

they appear in red...

i got one the other day, someone asking if anyone wanted to help with a quest, i replied, and he invited me to group... but we were miles away, met up, and completed the quest..

how can i send those messages?

/1 Bla Bla

Says Bla Bla in General (Entire zone).

/y Bla Bla

Yells Bla Bla, visible to everyone within an increased range when compared to /s

/w <username> Bla Bla

A private message to <username>; knows no boundaries except horde/alliance/realms.

/bg bla bla

Says bla bla to your entire battleground group.

/r woohoo

Replies to the last person who sent you a private message (Note : just pressing R is enough to open the reply box too :))

/p bla bla

Says bla bla to your party

That should pretty much clear all your doubts regarding tells.

I tried Kalecgos my first time today. Cant believe how easy it was from a tanking stand point. I got the whole portal rotation thing on my first attempt. The Demon did roflstomp me tho on the last attempt.

Heres a screenshot of damage taken from the demon using recount:

post-65970-1223441069.jpg

Edited by Adamb10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!