Recommended Posts

I'm saying you'd stay on your collective faction.. Horde or Alliance.. and be able to switch within the sub-factions.
We wanted to give everyone a very early heads-up that, in response to player requests, we’re developing a new service for World of Warcraft that will allow players to change their faction from Alliance to Horde or Horde to Alliance. There’s still much work to do and many details to iron out, but the basic idea is that players will be able to use the service to transform an existing character into a roughly equivalent character of the opposing faction on the same realm. Players who ended up creating and leveling up characters on the opposite factions from their friends have been asking for this type of functionality for some time, and we’re pleased to be getting closer to being able to deliver it.

As with all of the features and services we offer, we intend to incorporate the faction-change service in a way that won’t disrupt the gameplay experience on the realms, and there will be some rules involved with when and how the service can be used. The number of variables involved increases the complexity of implementing this service, but we plan to take the time needed to ensure that it lives up to expectations before officially rolling it out. We’ll go into much more detail on all of this here at http://www.WorldofWarcraft.com as development progresses. In the meantime, we wanted to let you know that because this type of functionality requires extensive internal testing well in advance of release, you may be seeing bits and pieces of the service in the test builds we use for the public test realms moving forward.

Source: http://blue.mmo-champion.com/1/18031079410...-the-works.html

I'm assuming everything you have as Alliance will be turned into the Horde equalivant. Probally be able to choose whatever race you want to be as there isn't a clear change between the two to line up. Though the only way they could implement it would be with some serious restrictions and heavily moderation as to not ruin the game with unbalance between the two factions.

And they've introduced raid extensions. You can extend raid numbers so they don't reset weekly. Which means a guild (Ensidia for example) who undoubtly is working hard to down Yogg-Saron with 0 Keepers (legitly) can extend there raid lockout so they don't have to clear all bosses previous and continue to fight only on Yogg. A nifty feature that probally wouldn't be utilize by too many guilds as gear from bosses can still be used for off-set. Still a nice change.

Edited by Slane
Source: http://blue.mmo-champion.com/1/18031079410...-the-works.html

I'm assuming everything you have as Alliance will be turned into the Horde equalivant. Probally be able to choose whatever race you want to be as there isn't a clear change between the two to line up. Though the only way they could implement it would be with some serious restrictions and heavily moderation as to not ruin the game with unbalance between the two factions.

If by "restrictions" you probably mean coining people for another $15-20 or something, yes :p

Honestly i like the idea of faction changes because it means they are working in the correct direction with rep translation and things however i hope that in the same tool they are going to make it possible for Race changes. I would love to be able to take my Orc Warlock and make him a blood elf. They just did not exist when i created him lol.

If by "restrictions" you probably mean coining people for another $15-20 or something, yes :p

You would have to pay for it (just like name changes and server changes) but I mean other restrictions other than monetary ( besides monetary restriction is artifical like restricting a boss to 1 hour a week on tries to make him seem "hard").

A few ideas I thought of:

  • Can only do a faction change if your server is balanced in terms of population. If Horde dominate on a server (vice-versa with Alliance) and Alliance are underpopulated, only Horde should be allowed to faction change to help bring balance to the server.
  • Once/if you do do a faction change you should be stuck on that realm for an extended amount of time (6 months a year). This is to prevent people from faction changing on there server and immediatly dipping out to a realm of there choosing and this toon won't be eligible for account transfer for the same time period.
  • To expand further on point one, Blizzard needs to have protocols in place to suspend service of faction changing if to many people are trying to do it or if the server population will become out of wack.
  • If you faction changed one toon and Blizzard has suspend faction changing to keep the population balance you should still be able to faction change alts on the same realm. Reason being if it's the same account it wouldn't affect active population, because you can only play one toon at a time per account.

I'm sure we could probally think of more restrictions that would need to be in place to control this feature.

I hate having Tuesdays off!

Argh

I went back for some reason... i guess the 3.2 was calling for me for some reason..

but I wanted to try horde though, I have been playing Alliance for so long I never really tried Horde before

Anyways I started a warrior and a DK (DK mainly to help moneywise with the warrior)

I have somewhat of newbie question, yeah after 4 years of playing....

like I am not 71 in outlands, and I am curious of instances, even with crappy gear (no defense gear at all), will i be able to tank an instance ? or should I just go in as dps?

Slane, I was considering that myself. Surely, they'll have population restrictions for jumping factions. At least, this will allow servers that are incredibly unbalanced like Illidan (we would pray for an Alliance to take a PvP objective just so we could cap it) to balance out by allowing free faction changes and such.

I am going to have to disagree with being on a 6 month transfer cooldown. If anything, it should be the same as the transfer cooldown right now which is only a month if I'm not mistaken. Anything longer is just a bit ridiculous. The idea behind all this is to allow players who have friends on another realm to be able to jump to them AND to their faction. Pain in the ass releveling toons just because you don't have an alliance side paladin and such... (as I'm doing now)

I do wonder how they'll do reputation changes. Some will need to be flipped while others can stay the same. Probably shouldn't be too hard I would imagine.

Overall, I just hope that I can choose the race that at least has my character's class. That is, a BE paladin shouldn't automatically become a human paladin. Should be at least a choice among the classes that you can choose. I'm also hoping you can change your characters looks and/or sex if anything...

I know this Faction Change thing is going to make a lot of long time WoW players annoyed but for me this is really excellent. A friend of mine has an Alliance Rogue lvl 70 and I have a Druid Horde lvl 76. They are on different servers but we can't play them together even if they were on the same Realm. So instead we both created Hunter Hordes on my Server and Ally Mages on his Server. But really we just want to get to the end game and play together in Battle Grounds and stuff. So this faction transfer is really great I'll switch to Alliance as soon as this available to play with my friend.

I am going to have to disagree with being on a 6 month transfer cooldown. If anything, it should be the same as the transfer cooldown right now which is only a month if I'm not mistaken. Anything longer is just a bit ridiculous. The idea behind all this is to allow players who have friends on another realm to be able to jump to them AND to their faction. Pain in the ass releveling toons just because you don't have an alliance side paladin and such... (as I'm doing now)

While the 6 month cooldown may be harsh, what if a bunch of Alliance players switched factions and all joined Horde on Illidan. Would that help out at all? What if a large number of Horde on Illidan all switched to Alliance, in which case to balance the active population but the majority of them transfered off and you ended in the same situation just with less overall numbers all around? There has to be balance to do it. It would destroy realms if you could just switch and end up within or month or so xsfer off.

While it's problem way to early to speculate on it, I can see this a major way of ruining the game further if there isn't some strict restrictions all around the service.

do any of you play on private servers?

No and you want to leave this thread, asap if you want to discuss that.

My guild is on Shattered Halls the where prices are ridiculous and the Horde/Alliance ratio is 80/1 anything that would help people to switch sides is a plus in my book

(I have a lvl 76 Human Lock that I havent logged on in 2 months because of that specific reason)

With these new changes coming, it shows WOW is finally hurting. I told my guild awhile ago, if wow ever allows you to change from horde to alliance, it would be the start of the fall... and guess what.. Was a fun ride, but I am not riding it down :)

With these new changes coming, it shows WOW is finally hurting. I told my guild awhile ago, if wow ever allows you to change from horde to alliance, it would be the start of the fall... and guess what.. Was a fun ride, but I am not riding it down :)

+1.

Switching factions is so weak.

If you want an alliance toon, choose alliance.

If you want a horde toon, choose horde.

This is honestly the biggest let down in the years I've been playing.

Forget about all the nerfing and buffing of classes/specs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!