Recommended Posts

GAH!!!! Some Rogue was in WSG yesterday using the N word so I reported him and he started calling me names etc, Fine.

later on I saw him in AV and I thought I would use my afk macro to see if he would afk out. He did. He was from our server so I then got a whisper saying that he was going to report me so I said ok go ahead.

I then put him on ignore as he was still whining and calling me names.

This morning I open my work email to find the below!!! I was ****ed off lol

Account: KAFBECK

Date of Violation: 28/11/09

Character name involved: Phearz

Type of violation: Abuse of game mechanics Details of incident: Abusing game mechanics with emotes in an attempt to trick players into exiting a battleground.

Consequences for account: Warning placed on account

Greetings,

We are writing to inform you that we have, unfortunately, had to add a warning to your World of Warcraft account. It is with regret that we take this type of action; however, it is in the best interests of the World of Warcraft community as a whole and for the integrity of the game.

Please note that should any further violations of our Rules and Policies occur, this incident will be taken into consideration when determining the consequences to your account. This could include further warnings, account suspension or account termination.

We strongly suggest you review our current Rules and Policies to avoid further action in the future, these can be found at:

http://www.wow-europe.com/en/policy/

Please do not reply to this email as you will receive an automated response. If you have any further enquiries regarding your account status, please use the webform at the following address:

http://eu.blizzard.com/support/webform.xml?lan=en

Regards,

English Game Master Team

Blizzard Europe

My BG Macro

/em has flagged you as AFK, This mean you will not be able to receive Honour or XP. To dispute this flag please type /AFK Dispute.

so I am being punished because I can make someone leave via /afk, its their game fix it

That sounds pretty petty to make such a fuss about and all because you couldn't be the bigger person. I agreed with you up to the point where you started to retaliate after he called you names in trade chat or wherever it was.

Managed to pick up this baby for my level 35 Paladin. Even although it's from a rare spawn I got to the location and he was there :laugh: Usually I have no luck what so ever in this game.

Crit rate is crazy, my Vengeance is pretty much on 24/7 when fighting mobs.

And no, I didn't need to/shouldn't have sold for gold on AH, I have a 75 alt with enough gold to help me level.

so I am being punished because I can make someone leave via /afk, its their game fix it

This is why I just report a player, add them to my ignore list, and then leave it alone.

I'm not sure what you are so upset about. He didn't break any rules by using profanity and being nasty (there is a swear filter after all). You reported him, it was now in Blizzards hands. But you took it into your own hands... so I'm not sure why you are so shocked at Blizzards response.

Don't tell me you didn't have a smug sense of satisfaction when your ploy worked (I know I would have, lol). Just take your warning and move on.

Or quit the game and move on. Hell, I don't care.

----

On a side note. When the hell is 3.3 going to get here? Tomorrow I hope.

GAH!!!! Some Rogue was in WSG yesterday using the N word so I reported him and he started calling me names etc, Fine.

later on I saw him in AV and I thought I would use my afk macro to see if he would afk out. He did. He was from our server so I then got a whisper saying that he was going to report me so I said ok go ahead.

I then put him on ignore as he was still whining and calling me names.

This morning I open my work email to find the below!!! I was ****ed off lol

My BG Macro

so I am being punished because I can make someone leave via /afk, its their game fix it

I hate how blizz punishes people for using something that's available in-game, even if that's now how it was intended. Back in BC, the guild I was in used to use a similar macro to get the rest out of our group into a BG after they shafted pvp guilds and changed group queuing. I wouldn't let a warning get to you too much. I've only received maybe one warning and a 3-hour ban(Spamming on a RP server) in a 4 year span playing the game.

If someone is insulting you, breaking the rules, or whatever, best option is to /ignore and report them. Retaliating with other nonsense including insulting them back even will do you no good at all, and only get your ass warned too.

All in all, learn to control your anger and not let it get the best of ya. I know concentrating all my anger into a middle finger aimed at the computer monitor has certainly helped me be more "civil" compared to the swearing I used to do. :p

2746 Gear Score.

40th ranked Survival Hunter (out of 1208) on Maelstrom.

58th out of all hunters (2109).

Im guessing WoW-Heroes score?

Just to let you know wow heroes is not accurate at all in predicting or telling how good you are compared to others simply because it is not done in realtime. Players seem always to be cached and the score is a cached score. So their score might have gone up from the last time someone looked them up. Also wow-heroes only gets players on there who have been searched for before either by themselves or by other players. If a player has never been looked into on wow heroes then that player will not show on any overall rankings.

I thought I had a pretty good gear score untill i refreshed a few people above me, then i realised that the gap between my gear score and thiers has increased even more.

In all fairness it still is skill>gear

Gear Score doesn't mean SQUAT.

I got my tier 9 shoulder pads the other night and my gear score went DOWN.

I'm going to be getting a greatness card soon, (one of the absolute best dps trinkets in game until 25 man TGoC) and my gear score will go DOWN.

Do not rely upon gear score for ANYTHING.

A crappy player can have a great gear score and still do **** dps, likewise a great player can have a crap gear score and do phenomenal dps.

A source of controversy is that gear scores can be artificially inflated by using gear with higher ilvl and stats, but which is actually harmful to the class wearing it. One example is the use of cloth armor by classes that can wear plate armor to inflate a gear score, then simply wearing whatever gear is actually of use. A counterpoint to this issue is that if a player knows the game well enough to do this, they possibly are skilled enough at their class to overcome any gear deficiency.

Gear score also, often does not calculate the effects of enchantments, gems, or the player's use of potions and other enhancements to boost their abilities. Even if a player has a high gear score, poor selections of such enhancements can have a very negative impact on game performance.

http://armorylite.com/us/blackrock/anarkii/

4105 Gearscore. 64th rated rogue on my server. My gear isnt that bad, its mostly TotC stuff, some dudes have all heroic versions, crazy and lucky!

Gear Score doesn't mean SQUAT.

I got my tier 9 shoulder pads the other night and my gear score went DOWN.

I'm going to be getting a greatness card soon, (one of the absolute best dps trinkets in game until 25 man TGoC) and my gear score will go DOWN.

Do not rely upon gear score for ANYTHING.

A crappy player can have a great gear score and still do **** dps, likewise a great player can have a crap gear score and do phenomenal dps.

A source of controversy is that gear scores can be artificially inflated by using gear with higher ilvl and stats, but which is actually harmful to the class wearing it. One example is the use of cloth armor by classes that can wear plate armor to inflate a gear score, then simply wearing whatever gear is actually of use. A counterpoint to this issue is that if a player knows the game well enough to do this, they possibly are skilled enough at their class to overcome any gear deficiency.

Gear score also, often does not calculate the effects of enchantments, gems, or the player's use of potions and other enhancements to boost their abilities. Even if a player has a high gear score, poor selections of such enhancements can have a very negative impact on game performance.

+1

I refuse to get rid of my greatness card, I had a lvl 245 trinket and my dps suffered tremendously, I was pumping out anywhere from 6K-11K with greatness, and when I had the lvl 245 trinket, my dps dropped down to a average of bout 3-7K.

So gear score means diddlysquat. Learn your rotations or buttons, and your class and ull be topping the charts, even in blues.

You can say all you want about gearscore, and I do agree that it has no bearing on skill, but it is still useful. It's not meant to be used as much as people seem to use it (at least for Horde on Burning Legion), but it's useful when putting together pugs. Chances are somebody with a 4.5k GS (GearScore number, not WoW-Heroes) has a better chance of contributing more to the raid than somebody with a 3k GS. It's just that simple. Will they always do better? No, but when you're pugging you don't know every single person in the group, so you have to have some sort of measurement of potential raid contribution, and GearScore is really the only way to do that.

That being said, I almost always beat out other mages with better GS than me. It seems the 2-button Arcane rotation is still too difficult for most people to master :rolleyes:

You can say all you want about gearscore, and I do agree that it has no bearing on skill, but it is still useful. It's not meant to be used as much as people seem to use it (at least for Horde on Burning Legion), but it's useful when putting together pugs. Chances are somebody with a 4.5k GS (GearScore number, not WoW-Heroes) has a better chance of contributing more to the raid than somebody with a 3k GS. It's just that simple. Will they always do better? No, but when you're pugging you don't know every single person in the group, so you have to have some sort of measurement of potential raid contribution, and GearScore is really the only way to do that.

That being said, I almost always beat out other mages with better GS than me. It seems the 2-button Arcane rotation is still too difficult for most people to master :rolleyes:

Useful for players who know what they're doing. Pointless for those who don't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!