Recommended Posts

Good reason. Go faceroll an easy instance to see how raiders of your guild would work together. Makes sense, but if that's the DPS ya'll pulled on Thad, then everyone needs to work on rotation, proper talents, and gearing. Serious, no offense man but as a warrior tank running Naxx10 in a mixture of T6/Heroic gear, the Tuesday after LK launch, I was pulling 2.5k DPS on the fight. The dps I had was usually upward of 4-5k. With anyone being able to snag T9 and other accessories via badge gear (and lower badge gear) you should all be higher. No offense meant, but I would personalyl push to have that raised.

Wow. You sure are cocky aren't you?

We. were. not. trying.

That's exactly the point your missing. It went directly over your head.

Please come back when you understand that and stop insulting my guild.

Nobody's being mean or insulting, just honest. I pull 4.5k+ single-target DPS on my Mage in T9 in heroics on trash, also without trying. There's only so much you can pin on "not trying." The people on that meter need to work on rotations, enchants, etc. if you want to progress to any more content.

Wow. You sure are cocky aren't you?

We. were. not. trying.

That's exactly the point your missing. It went directly over your head.

Please come back when you understand that and stop insulting my guild.

If you were not trying or there was no effort in it then why post a screenshot? Also posting a screenshot you have to be ready for some criticism

Slane,

The problem is that the vast majority of people who play this game see it differently, to them its the difference between playing a competative sport (your view) and watching a competative sport (my view). If I am paying 50 bucks for tickets to watch the Sharks beat the crap out of LA Kings, someone shouldn't come and block my view in the third period because I'm not wearing a sharks jersey. Why does it effect you if I am just handed the content?

edit:

On a side note I haven't been able to find any guilds that are doing Ulduar content except for the weeklies. Majority of guilds are doing TOTC 10 and 25 Heroic and Normal but the problem is that even those guilds are requiring 5k minimum GS just to get a chance at the raid. The other night I got in a PUG 25 TOTC and on the twins the bad ass trinket dropped, I rolled a 922 and the raid leader told me I didn't deserve it because I hadn't run the raid enough.

Nubs, you know you can get 5k GS without touching a raid. My Priest's gear is all from badges and the ICC 5 mans. Just farm and you'll have it easy.

If you were not trying or there was no effort in it then why post a screenshot? Also posting a screenshot you have to be ready for some criticism

Because I was proud of the fact that we downed him with three seconds to go on the enrage timer.

It was freaking crazy luck. You don't see it happening every day.

Because I was proud of the fact that we downed him with three seconds to go on the enrage timer.

It was freaking crazy luck. You don't see it happening every day.

Downed him after the enrage first time our guild downed him a year ago. Disengage + Killshot does wonders. but that was the days of 4k dps. Now its more like OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!

So let me get this straight you guys were not downing him fast on purpose and holding back on dps to see how close you could get to the enrage, just to see how well you did under pressure?

If you really want to see how the guild performs under pressure try something more current and challenging like ToC or ICC alternatively some old achievements like nax undying, Of the nightfall can also test that.

On a sidenote though the dps is pretty low considering you get a buff that multiplys the dps depening on which side you stand on. My DK tank does about 3-4k on this fight (less than 4.6k gs)

Downing festergut within 3 secs of the enrage timer was crazy for our guild, because the guild is gearing up still we improved this week by 10 secs :D

Because I was proud of the fact that we downed him with three seconds to go on the enrage timer.

It was freaking crazy luck. You don't see it happening every day.

Well done Mini, i've seen your guild play when you setup that live thing the other week, and I was impressed how you took down Onyxia. Don't let these guys tear ya down dude, WoW is about doing things at your own pace. :D

I decided to give my 69 Druid a bash ( Now 70 ) just to get back to my sweet Horde. I tried to queue up as a tank and instantly I could join an instance :laugh:

Tried 3 times, instant every time! And when you get in, people know there's a "lack" of tanks, so they beg you to stay in case there's a wipe, they sweet-talk you,

some dude even gave me 5g for repairs, only me because he caused a wipe.

Oh the love :rofl:

Just got my 4 Piece bonus from Tier 9 Armor set. Soon I should have my first Tier 10 piece. (Going rather slow due to not playing every day or doing Icc)

Image cropped from Armory

post-120066-12653822136494_thumb.png

Character = GalenHawke

Server = Skywall

Race = Forsaken

Faction = Horde

Class = Warlock

Specification = Destruction / Demonology

Wow. You sure are cocky aren't you?

We. were. not. trying.

That's exactly the point your missing. It went directly over your head.

Please come back when you understand that and stop insulting my guild.

/sigh

Come back with a SS of you actually trying to shut us all up.

Well done Mini, i've seen your guild play when you setup that live thing the other week, and I was impressed how you took down Onyxia. Don't let these guys tear ya down dude, WoW is about doing things at your own pace. :D

It is. I was simply telling him my own advice to help him and his other guildies to move on into the newer content and be able to meet the requirements DPS wise. I meant no harm or insult by it. Merely giving my 2 cent on the DPS shown in the SS.

  • Like 2

on the other side .... every DK , warr druid and pala with crappy gear can get away with it just by selecting "tank" these days .... and if ur healer your stuck with a boomkin druid in bear form with 5k health in an instance where mobs hit for 3k every time :) N-Joy teh LFD

on the other side .... every DK , warr druid and pala with crappy gear can get away with it just by selecting "tank" these days .... and if ur healer your stuck with a boomkin druid in bear form with 5k health in an instance where mobs hit for 3k every time :) N-Joy teh LFD

?Qu? es el Lenguaje?

Tried it and hated it.

I haven't tried it yet. What do you like more about WoW compared to Guild? I just finished my 10 day trial of WoW, and now I am going to try the Guild demo next.

I think I want to see about getting into one or the other.

Nubs, you know you can get 5k GS without touching a raid. My Priest's gear is all from badges and the ICC 5 mans. Just farm and you'll have it easy.

I have been farming and I am up to 4890 now. I am working in PVP to get 245 Boots from running alterac valley over and over. Alas, last night I was watching the raid PUGs looking for more members, the GS requirement for ICC 10-Man is up at 5500 now. Feels like I'm aiming at a moving target.

I haven't tried it yet. What do you like more about WoW compared to Guild? I just finished my 10 day trial of WoW, and now I am going to try the Guild demo next.

I think I want to see about getting into one or the other.

Honestly, I can't put my finger on it, but I just didn't like the feel of it. It felt very cheap, which is how most MMOs feel to me when compared to WoW. I really can't describe it in any other way :/

I haven't tried it yet. What do you like more about WoW compared to Guild? I just finished my 10 day trial of WoW, and now I am going to try the Guild demo next.

I think I want to see about getting into one or the other.

Guild Wars is like an empty shell of a game overrun by gold sellers and account hijackers. Getting on there while I was off of WoW around September just wasn't that fun. I mean sure, graphically, the game is nice. But that's where a lot of the good things end. WoW simply feels like there's a lot more life to it. Professions in WoW also give the game a lot more social interaction with people, as everyone needs enchants, gems to be cut, various things to be made, and so forth. It's how an MMO really should be.

That said, there are to be no updates to Guild Wars as far as content goes, so you might as well stick with World of Warcraft since it has life and still many things to come.

Of course, I'm certainly not going to tell you what to play. I mean, you'll probably be able to figure that out yourself, especially since you've tried WoW first. Going back just isn't as fun or easy once you get settled in.

I've played Guild Wars for about 6 months before I sold the account.

Pluses

Decent Graphics = There more realistic than WoW and the game generally just looks better.

Detail = Alot of the armor models and the world in general has a high level of detail.

No Grinding = The level cap is 20 which I guess is achievable in less than a day /played. I never reached the level cap but I got close.

No Subscription Fees = Guild Wars is the poor mans MMO, you pay once and you're set.

Downsides

Instanced World = The entire world minus the cities are instanced. This makes the world feel empty and it's a big detracking point to the game. Sure theres plus's of instancing but the cons outweigh them, I want the world to feel populated.

Jumping = You cant jump in Guild wars. Further more, the world is restricted in where you can walk. You cant just walk wherever the hell you want like in WoW or EQ. Basically you can only stay on the main paths in zones because theres invisible walls everywhere else. It was annoying to say the least.

Customer Service = I've heard bad things about the customer service @ NCSoft

I know it's hard for someone like you, a complete WoW fanatic to see the truth but what I'm saying is not something just grabbed thin air, it's

actually how the world works; look around you - Every time someone talks WoW in public there's always someone to laugh or make a hurtful comment, WoW is being

mocked in the public media, it's being mocked by every day people and even gamers will take World of Warcraft players down a notch or two.

Again, where are you seeing these people? Around the office most people couldn't tell the difference between warcraft and wii sports unless you sat them down in front of the damn thing

Even then, the only difference they'd notice is that one is played with waggley paddles and one requires a keyboard and mouse. In my experience (which is admittedly sample-biased towards to middle-upper class science or art major 20-30 somethings) the only way to invite scorn or public ridicule would be:

  • Call somebody a '***' or say 'that's gay' when you mean something is uninteresting or stupid. Bigotry of other kinds is so rare that if you were to be a racist we'd likely assume you were joking.
  • Claim to be a social conservative (ie: oppose gay marriage/abortion, support capital punishment/etc, oppose women in the workplace, etc.)
  • Be ignorant to the world around you: unable to discuss cultural difference between Egypt and Pakistan (or worse: unable to point them out on a map).
  • Believing in pseudo-science (homeopath) or myths (astrology).
  • Support animal cruelty (ie: bull fights)

I guess there are just so many good reasons to question a person's integrity that choice of electronic entertainment just doesn't make the list. The people I interact with on a day-to-day basis just don't have the time to find minor 'faults' to judge people on. Either you're a reasonable human being and we can all get along, or you're an overt jerk and nobody bothers to spend much more time on the subject.

The world you describe is very foreign to me, and I'm glad I don't live among people with time for such petty pursuits.

I've even seen a friend lose his job, home and most of his friends to this game.

That's a shame. When you have a sample size as large as warcraft (roughly 15 million people) + many more than have played and quit you're bound to find some edge cases of volatile behaviour.

World of Warcraft not only rots people's minds but it has also attracted basically every annoying element from the real world, so socially it can feel like a complete

cesspool and feel like retard-hangout. So World of Warcraft attracts the worst kind and it has also converted people to empty shells basically.

Didn't you just say that your friend had a home and job and friends until warcraft corrupted him?

Which is it? Warcraft destroys successful people or is the resting place of the damned?

Yes, some people know how to manage this bla. bla bla. but this is the public image of World of Warcraft and I don't protest that image for a second

because I've seen it all, everything said about the game is true and that's despite I'm actually playing it actively myself.

I haven't seen it. I guess our two anecdotes cancel each other out.

So comparing that image to sports is pretty god damn daft and no, I'm not living in fear because you'd have to be pretty damn hooked to accidentally

start talking about your World of Warcraft experience in the middle of a conversation; you just shut the hell up about it in public so people won't

think you are a complete loser like you would shut the hell up about everything else weird you do within the confines of your home.

Once again you're harping on the risk that somebody might find out about your choice in video games. The way you implore people to "just shut the hell up in public" you'd think they were closeting jews from the Nazis or participating in linch mobs.

I'm not living in fear and I just try very hard not to embarrass myself

around friends and strangers.

Around most of my friends: embarrassing would be to be caught as a child molester or racist. "I like to play video game X" is about as relevant as "I don't like to eat peanut butter." Surely you can understand my incredulity when you describe such a different social landscape. The life you describe is so frighteningly judgemental that the only places I can imagine that harsh are public high schools and prisons.

If you honestly feel that you'd be shamed for something so trivial I'd encourage you to make some new friends: take up motorcycle racing, learn glass blowing, become a benefactor of local theatre, or study a martial art. I can assure you from personal experience that (at least in my city) it'd be very unusual for anybody, never mind the majority, of people with interests that diverse to judge a person on such trivial matters.

Again, where are you seeing these people? Around the office most people couldn't tell the difference between warcraft and wii sports unless you sat them down in front of the damn thing

Even then, the only difference they'd notice is that one is played with waggley paddles and one requires a keyboard and mouse. In my experience (which is admittedly sample-biased towards to middle-upper class science or art major 20-30 somethings) the only way to invite scorn or public ridicule would be:

  • Call somebody a '***' or say 'that's gay' when you mean something is uninteresting or stupid. Bigotry of other kinds is so rare that if you were to be a racist we'd likely assume you were joking.
  • Claim to be a social conservative (ie: oppose gay marriage/abortion, support capital punishment/etc, oppose women in the workplace, etc.)
  • Be ignorant to the world around you: unable to discuss cultural difference between Egypt and Pakistan (or worse: unable to point them out on a map).
  • Believing in pseudo-science (homeopath) or myths (astrology).
  • Support animal cruelty (ie: bull fights)

I guess there are just so many good reasons to question a person's integrity that choice of electronic entertainment just doesn't make the list. The people I interact with on a day-to-day basis just don't have the time to find minor 'faults' to judge people on. Either you're a reasonable human being and we can all get along, or you're an overt jerk and nobody bothers to spend much more time on the subject.

The world you describe is very foreign to me, and I'm glad I don't live among people with time for such petty pursuits.

Not sure what to say, you already stated you aren't even in the target group of my arguments and you haven't even experienced it.

My posts where made from my point of view, my experiences and why I wouldn't wear clothing or tell anyone I play a game with such a tattered image.

That's a shame. When you have a sample size as large as warcraft (roughly 15 million people) + many more than have played and quit you're bound to find some edge cases of volatile behaviour.

Exactly why the game has a bad image, it has a huge fanbase ( 11 Million was the latest, AFAIK? ) and everything tied to the game and even has a mention of the game

will help towards that bad image, thus I won't associate myself with this image.

Didn't you just say that your friend had a home and job and friends until warcraft corrupted him?

Which is it? Warcraft destroys successful people or is the resting place of the damned?

Both evn, both - I know it's hard to grasp but in 11 Million people, it's possible.

I haven't seen it. I guess our two anecdotes cancel each other out.

k

Once again you're harping on the risk that somebody might find out about your choice in video games. The way you implore people to "just shut the hell up in public" you'd think they were closeting jews from the Nazis or participating in linch mobs.

No, it's about saving yourself of having to listen to crap, be made fun of, be the center of the light-hearted jokes around the office etc.

I've seen it happen to people who admit they play WoW and I just avoid it by going the easy route.

Around most of my friends: embarrassing would be to be caught as a child molester or racist. "I like to play video game X" is about as relevant as "I don't like to eat peanut butter." Surely you can understand my incredulity when you describe such a different social landscape. The life you describe is so frighteningly judgemental that the only places I can imagine that harsh are public high schools and prisons.

Okay? Can't possibly be several degrees of embarrassment but sure - Let's use the worst of the lot. You honestly sound like you

have no clue on how cruel, how judgemental or how vindictive the youth of today's nation can be ... Oh you already stated you aren't part of the

the target group I spoke of.

If you honestly feel that you'd be shamed for something so trivial I'd encourage you to make some new friends: take up motorcycle racing, learn glass blowing, become a benefactor of local theatre, or study a martial art. I can assure you from personal experience that (at least in my city) it'd be very unusual for anybody, never mind the majority, of people with interests that diverse to judge a person on such trivial matters.

I think this has been covered.

Understand what I said was me explaining things from my point of view, explained my opinion - No way in hell can you "compare" two different lives like you do just to counter-argue, that's just daft.

And don't bother replying to this unless you want to save face because I won't be reading it, this isn't the place to do this because it's not like a World of Warcraft thread is the best forum to have people

discuss this without getting all butthurt and counter-argue like crazy because they feel offended. I should have brought up those points somewhere a bit more "neutral".

Both evn, both - I know it's hard to grasp but in 11 Million people, it's possible.

?

No, it's about saving yourself of having to listen to crap, be made fun of, be the center of the light-hearted jokes around the office etc.

I'm curious: do you also encourage people do deny their vegetarianism (or 'shut the hell up about it' in public) for fear they be likened to Hitler?

Okay? Can't possibly be several degrees of embarrassment but sure - Let's use the worst of the lot. You honestly sound like you

have no clue on how cruel, how judgemental or how vindictive the youth of today's nation can be ... Oh you already stated you aren't part of the

the target group I spoke of.

Actually I don't really have any idea what kids are like today. I did attend 2 years of public high-school but that was nearly 10 years ago. My first trip through university was a bit of a haze and also before internet gaming really took off. Playstation/Nintendo were very common then and nobody cared what games you played. I have stated that I remember high-school being very judgemental - mostly because I was on the 'judging' side of the fence.

I also remember that my position, if that's the right word, in the 'cool clique' had everything to do with the brand of jeans I wore and the kind of car my parents drove and nothing to do with my hobbies (I took sailing lessons, kung-fu, and played drums: hardly the coolest weekend activities). I guess that's why I think it's so irrelevant: the people we mocked would have been mocked no matter what their personal flaws?as we perceived them?were.

I guess if you're offering advice to high-school kids - more power to you. I think you're offering pretty crumby advice ("hide yourself lest people judge you") but maybe your character isn't capable of withstanding minor slings. From my experience was the opposite advice: be what you want to because most people are too wrapped up in their own lives to even notice your peculiarities, never mind judge you for them. You're going to meet jerks everywhere in life, the variety you find in a highschool are harmless so you might as well use them to temper your resolve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!