Recommended Posts

Just wait, armour pieces and entire sets up next.

Doubt it. These are just collectors items and have no bearing on game mechanics. Blizzard did this before they merged with Activision, like giving you extra pets for buying the Collector's Edition (like Mini Diablo or the Frost Whelpling). This is just an extension of that. Everybody likes money, and people have money to spend. Give them the opportunity if it doesn't **** with the game, I say.

BTW, position 53604. Nowhere near 5 hours. It's estimating 3 hours now, which I'm sure is way off too at the way this queue is dropping by about 1,000 every 30 seconds to a minute.

lol, it's all about how you want to spend your money.

Some people will spend their money on a night they'll barely remember. At least this purchase is a one time thing, and I'll get to enjoy it for many days to come. In fact, I'd say it's on par with buying a nice shirt. :p

I'm kinda disgusted at the price they're charging but I guess it's "because they can" - it has Activision's greedy markings all over it. I mean, it's half the price of a full game for a cosmetic item. Why not spend the money on Dragon Age Awakening or something and get hours and hours of entertainment as opposed to an item that you stare at for a small portion of time in game, given that there's already TONS of people with it which'll make yours look lame and not quite as special as you originally thought. :unsure:

Having said that, I did sell my Blizzcon 08 Polar Bear mount for AU$290 (US$190, while the Aussie doller was down, which cost me AU$30) so in that regard I don't care that there are idiots with too much money. :laugh:

And for the record, it's NOT limited edition - it'll always be available. It's just the way the store work where they have to put in a finite number of keys at a time but are free to generate hundreds of thousands more codes as there is demand.

Why not spend the money on Dragon Age Awakening or something and get hours and hours of entertainment as opposed to an item that you stare at for a small portion of time in game, given that there's already TONS of people with it which'll make yours look lame and not quite as special as you originally thought. :unsure:

To each his own. Why bother farming ToGC / TK / Kara / etc. for mounts that don't improve your character in any meaningful way?

In terms of pure fashion $25 is chump change, as an example: my favorite t-shirts are very pricey compared to other options. While there may be some merrit to the "made in a first world nation" or "better materials" arguments, the majority of what you're paying for is vanity. It may be the particular cuts/styling, stitching details, or the particular graphic design work but none of that is going to keep you warmer on a cold day or make you impervious to fire. A video game mount offers the same 'real' utility: something pretty to look at for a couple of years. Other examples of vanity items are far more egregious (like teeth whitening) and for the most part nobody has any qualms about those.

I'll typically get a mount if it meets two conditions:

  • Dead silent: I hate mounts that make noise (see: flying carpet).
  • Fits through doorways: the mammoths are constantly dismounting you, and it'll only get worse in the expansion when we're all sent back to undercity and org.

This one has the interesting property of functioning as a land and flying mount which means you can replace your "/cast [mod:shift] horse; [flyable] bird; horse" macro and free up one more slot - that might almost be worth $25 to me.

To each his own. Why bother farming ToGC / TK / Kara / etc. for mounts that don't improve your character in any meaningful way?

In terms of pure fashion $25 is chump change, as an example: my favorite t-shirts are very pricey compared to other options. While there may be some merrit to the "made in a first world nation" or "better materials" arguments, the majority of what you're paying for is vanity. It may be the particular cuts/styling, stitching details, or the particular graphic design work but none of that is going to keep you warmer on a cold day or make you impervious to fire. A video game mount offers the same 'real' utility: something pretty to look at for a couple of years. Other examples of vanity items are far more egregious (like teeth whitening) and for the most part nobody has any qualms about those.

I'll typically get a mount if it meets two conditions:

  • Dead silent: I hate mounts that make noise (see: flying carpet).
  • Fits through doorways: the mammoths are constantly dismounting you, and it'll only get worse in the expansion when we're all sent back to undercity and org.

This one has the interesting property of functioning as a land and flying mount which means you can replace your "/cast [mod:shift] horse; [flyable] bird; horse" macro and free up one more slot - that might almost be worth $25 to me.

But I guess that's the thing - it'll be replaced by whatever the next cool item Blizzard releases or even just the Bone Dragons or Proto-drakes from the raid achievements. I can hardly see people using the mount 2 years down the track. Heck, I think once people see so many others with the mount the cool factor will quickly subside within a couple weeks but that's just my guess, I could well be wrong. Can you imagine the image linked above after a few days? There'll be soooo many of them around.

The shirt example is a bit different. My analogy in that case would be there's two mounts available on the Blizzard Store - one is $10 and just average and then there's the $25 celestial mount. If you are going to buy a mount, you're more likely to spend a bit extra to get the better looking one as opposed to the cheap one. I guess I just don't see the benefit of buying something to use in game for which there are already hundreds of different choices. There is the convienience of just having the one mount but I've been using the same mount macro for ages and I haven't thought about it at all unless I change mounts and I suspect it'll be less of an issue once Azerorth is flyable anyway (and Bliz may decide to have more mounts behave in that fashion).

#show Forsaken Warhorse
/script local m=GetZoneText() if (m=="Dalaran" or m=="Wintergrasp") and (GetSubZoneText()~="Krasus' Landing") then CallCompanion("MOUNT",12);end
/use [flyable,nomounted] Rusted Proto-Drake; [nomounted] Forsaken Warhorse
/dismount

Honestly, I think some people are blowing it way out of proportion. People are going to buy the things they want.

I found that out when I tried to get people to at least back off MW2 to see how things played out. Anyone listen? No, not a damn soul. Then they get on the forums and bitch and complain about how it was short, didn't make sense, multiplayer sucks, etc. as if it was too hard to hold off from buying it just for a week. Bah... now I'm ranting.

Anyway, as I said, it's up to the individual. Besides, if those buying the mount are happy, who's it hurting? I hear all these stupid arguments on the MMO-Champion forums, like it kills the rareness of other mounts or whatever nonsense they can come up with. Fact of the matter is, it doesn't change a damn thing about the game. It's simply a pretty mount that is easy enough to obtain, which arguably requires more work than buying some of the in-game mounts already. (because waiting in a queue and putting in your billing information is more work than buying a mount at your local vendor)

As for speculation on adding armors/weapons/max level characters/gold to the store, I highly doubt Blizzard would do such a thing. Feel free to call me on it if they ever do though. ;)

I guess I just don't see the benefit of buying something to use in game for which there are already hundreds of different choices.

As opposed to a perfume when every soap, shampoo, tooth paste, hair product, pit-stick, etc. has a scent on it already?

There is the convienience of just having the one mount but I've been using the same mount macro for ages and I haven't thought about it at all unless I change mounts and I suspect it'll be less of an issue once Azerorth is flyable anyway (and Bliz may decide to have more mounts behave in that fashion).

Doesn't address the fact that you still need one for each character.

IE: my DK isn't a tailor so I can't recycle a macro for his flying mount. My alliance mage doesn't have access to the skeletal warhorse, etc.

You'll still need the flyable check because you have restrictions on flying everywhere (ie: warsong gultch, pit of saron, ulduar, etc) in addition to the capital city.

I'm not a fan of protodrakes at all: flying carpets win for being small, making no noise, having no excessive animations, not having passenger features, and not landing when you get remotely close to the ground. I'd pay $100 for "winged shoes": a 'mount' that works as a land or air mount, has no sound, model is tiny: like wings on your boots, scales to max skill, and doesn't let people "hop in" for a free ride. It's not a lot of money compared to say a hard-cover book or a night at the pub and it'd remove the biggest annoyance in the game.

Nobody is forcing people to buy it... if you want it get it if not leave the others be who have it :) ... Got it on all my alts, and i must say it does look sweet. Limited edition ... not really as theres 100s maybe 10,000s or peoples on the server who have one. If it was really limited edition there would not be so many.

I love it how they are using % instead of actualy figures or how many are left.

downside to the mount is you still have to dismount and remont in Dalaran to fly, it does not instantly fly when u get to the landing.

I'll just keep farming for my Deathcharger Reigns :p

I also really want a flying carpet, but tailoring has like zero use to a paladin :p I suppose since I have echanting I could at least shard the greens/blues.

Although my mining does give me a +25 stamina boost.

edit: I've realised there's actually a decent cloak or something to do with 400ap in regards to tailoring, might be worth a look!

They are everywhere on my server too (Jubei) I saw one guy with it, asked where he got it coz it looked amazing, checked out the Blizzard store to think bout buying one, went back to the landing in Dalaran and it was like every 2nd person had one. Decided to keep my money then :)

They do look incredible thou, may purchase one before the next xpac

They are everywhere on my server too (Jubei) I saw one guy with it, asked where he got it coz it looked amazing, checked out the Blizzard store to think bout buying one, went back to the landing in Dalaran and it was like every 2nd person had one. Decided to keep my money then :)

They do look incredible thou, may purchase one before the next xpac

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

I actually like this mount more than Invincible. I may be the only one, but I like excessive particle effects, and the stars look really cool.

I really bought this mount because the ground mount/flying mount aspect of this is very convenient, and now my alts get a cool and convenient mount. :p

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

And for the record, it's NOT limited edition - it'll always be available. It's just the way the store work where they have to put in a finite number of keys at a time but are free to generate hundreds of thousands more codes as there is demand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!