Recommended Posts

Just wait, armour pieces and entire sets up next.

Doubt it. These are just collectors items and have no bearing on game mechanics. Blizzard did this before they merged with Activision, like giving you extra pets for buying the Collector's Edition (like Mini Diablo or the Frost Whelpling). This is just an extension of that. Everybody likes money, and people have money to spend. Give them the opportunity if it doesn't **** with the game, I say.

BTW, position 53604. Nowhere near 5 hours. It's estimating 3 hours now, which I'm sure is way off too at the way this queue is dropping by about 1,000 every 30 seconds to a minute.

lol, it's all about how you want to spend your money.

Some people will spend their money on a night they'll barely remember. At least this purchase is a one time thing, and I'll get to enjoy it for many days to come. In fact, I'd say it's on par with buying a nice shirt. :p

I'm kinda disgusted at the price they're charging but I guess it's "because they can" - it has Activision's greedy markings all over it. I mean, it's half the price of a full game for a cosmetic item. Why not spend the money on Dragon Age Awakening or something and get hours and hours of entertainment as opposed to an item that you stare at for a small portion of time in game, given that there's already TONS of people with it which'll make yours look lame and not quite as special as you originally thought. :unsure:

Having said that, I did sell my Blizzcon 08 Polar Bear mount for AU$290 (US$190, while the Aussie doller was down, which cost me AU$30) so in that regard I don't care that there are idiots with too much money. :laugh:

And for the record, it's NOT limited edition - it'll always be available. It's just the way the store work where they have to put in a finite number of keys at a time but are free to generate hundreds of thousands more codes as there is demand.

Why not spend the money on Dragon Age Awakening or something and get hours and hours of entertainment as opposed to an item that you stare at for a small portion of time in game, given that there's already TONS of people with it which'll make yours look lame and not quite as special as you originally thought. :unsure:

To each his own. Why bother farming ToGC / TK / Kara / etc. for mounts that don't improve your character in any meaningful way?

In terms of pure fashion $25 is chump change, as an example: my favorite t-shirts are very pricey compared to other options. While there may be some merrit to the "made in a first world nation" or "better materials" arguments, the majority of what you're paying for is vanity. It may be the particular cuts/styling, stitching details, or the particular graphic design work but none of that is going to keep you warmer on a cold day or make you impervious to fire. A video game mount offers the same 'real' utility: something pretty to look at for a couple of years. Other examples of vanity items are far more egregious (like teeth whitening) and for the most part nobody has any qualms about those.

I'll typically get a mount if it meets two conditions:

  • Dead silent: I hate mounts that make noise (see: flying carpet).
  • Fits through doorways: the mammoths are constantly dismounting you, and it'll only get worse in the expansion when we're all sent back to undercity and org.

This one has the interesting property of functioning as a land and flying mount which means you can replace your "/cast [mod:shift] horse; [flyable] bird; horse" macro and free up one more slot - that might almost be worth $25 to me.

To each his own. Why bother farming ToGC / TK / Kara / etc. for mounts that don't improve your character in any meaningful way?

In terms of pure fashion $25 is chump change, as an example: my favorite t-shirts are very pricey compared to other options. While there may be some merrit to the "made in a first world nation" or "better materials" arguments, the majority of what you're paying for is vanity. It may be the particular cuts/styling, stitching details, or the particular graphic design work but none of that is going to keep you warmer on a cold day or make you impervious to fire. A video game mount offers the same 'real' utility: something pretty to look at for a couple of years. Other examples of vanity items are far more egregious (like teeth whitening) and for the most part nobody has any qualms about those.

I'll typically get a mount if it meets two conditions:

  • Dead silent: I hate mounts that make noise (see: flying carpet).
  • Fits through doorways: the mammoths are constantly dismounting you, and it'll only get worse in the expansion when we're all sent back to undercity and org.

This one has the interesting property of functioning as a land and flying mount which means you can replace your "/cast [mod:shift] horse; [flyable] bird; horse" macro and free up one more slot - that might almost be worth $25 to me.

But I guess that's the thing - it'll be replaced by whatever the next cool item Blizzard releases or even just the Bone Dragons or Proto-drakes from the raid achievements. I can hardly see people using the mount 2 years down the track. Heck, I think once people see so many others with the mount the cool factor will quickly subside within a couple weeks but that's just my guess, I could well be wrong. Can you imagine the image linked above after a few days? There'll be soooo many of them around.

The shirt example is a bit different. My analogy in that case would be there's two mounts available on the Blizzard Store - one is $10 and just average and then there's the $25 celestial mount. If you are going to buy a mount, you're more likely to spend a bit extra to get the better looking one as opposed to the cheap one. I guess I just don't see the benefit of buying something to use in game for which there are already hundreds of different choices. There is the convienience of just having the one mount but I've been using the same mount macro for ages and I haven't thought about it at all unless I change mounts and I suspect it'll be less of an issue once Azerorth is flyable anyway (and Bliz may decide to have more mounts behave in that fashion).

#show Forsaken Warhorse
/script local m=GetZoneText() if (m=="Dalaran" or m=="Wintergrasp") and (GetSubZoneText()~="Krasus' Landing") then CallCompanion("MOUNT",12);end
/use [flyable,nomounted] Rusted Proto-Drake; [nomounted] Forsaken Warhorse
/dismount

Honestly, I think some people are blowing it way out of proportion. People are going to buy the things they want.

I found that out when I tried to get people to at least back off MW2 to see how things played out. Anyone listen? No, not a damn soul. Then they get on the forums and bitch and complain about how it was short, didn't make sense, multiplayer sucks, etc. as if it was too hard to hold off from buying it just for a week. Bah... now I'm ranting.

Anyway, as I said, it's up to the individual. Besides, if those buying the mount are happy, who's it hurting? I hear all these stupid arguments on the MMO-Champion forums, like it kills the rareness of other mounts or whatever nonsense they can come up with. Fact of the matter is, it doesn't change a damn thing about the game. It's simply a pretty mount that is easy enough to obtain, which arguably requires more work than buying some of the in-game mounts already. (because waiting in a queue and putting in your billing information is more work than buying a mount at your local vendor)

As for speculation on adding armors/weapons/max level characters/gold to the store, I highly doubt Blizzard would do such a thing. Feel free to call me on it if they ever do though. ;)

I guess I just don't see the benefit of buying something to use in game for which there are already hundreds of different choices.

As opposed to a perfume when every soap, shampoo, tooth paste, hair product, pit-stick, etc. has a scent on it already?

There is the convienience of just having the one mount but I've been using the same mount macro for ages and I haven't thought about it at all unless I change mounts and I suspect it'll be less of an issue once Azerorth is flyable anyway (and Bliz may decide to have more mounts behave in that fashion).

Doesn't address the fact that you still need one for each character.

IE: my DK isn't a tailor so I can't recycle a macro for his flying mount. My alliance mage doesn't have access to the skeletal warhorse, etc.

You'll still need the flyable check because you have restrictions on flying everywhere (ie: warsong gultch, pit of saron, ulduar, etc) in addition to the capital city.

I'm not a fan of protodrakes at all: flying carpets win for being small, making no noise, having no excessive animations, not having passenger features, and not landing when you get remotely close to the ground. I'd pay $100 for "winged shoes": a 'mount' that works as a land or air mount, has no sound, model is tiny: like wings on your boots, scales to max skill, and doesn't let people "hop in" for a free ride. It's not a lot of money compared to say a hard-cover book or a night at the pub and it'd remove the biggest annoyance in the game.

Nobody is forcing people to buy it... if you want it get it if not leave the others be who have it :) ... Got it on all my alts, and i must say it does look sweet. Limited edition ... not really as theres 100s maybe 10,000s or peoples on the server who have one. If it was really limited edition there would not be so many.

I love it how they are using % instead of actualy figures or how many are left.

downside to the mount is you still have to dismount and remont in Dalaran to fly, it does not instantly fly when u get to the landing.

I'll just keep farming for my Deathcharger Reigns :p

I also really want a flying carpet, but tailoring has like zero use to a paladin :p I suppose since I have echanting I could at least shard the greens/blues.

Although my mining does give me a +25 stamina boost.

edit: I've realised there's actually a decent cloak or something to do with 400ap in regards to tailoring, might be worth a look!

They are everywhere on my server too (Jubei) I saw one guy with it, asked where he got it coz it looked amazing, checked out the Blizzard store to think bout buying one, went back to the landing in Dalaran and it was like every 2nd person had one. Decided to keep my money then :)

They do look incredible thou, may purchase one before the next xpac

They are everywhere on my server too (Jubei) I saw one guy with it, asked where he got it coz it looked amazing, checked out the Blizzard store to think bout buying one, went back to the landing in Dalaran and it was like every 2nd person had one. Decided to keep my money then :)

They do look incredible thou, may purchase one before the next xpac

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

I actually like this mount more than Invincible. I may be the only one, but I like excessive particle effects, and the stars look really cool.

I really bought this mount because the ground mount/flying mount aspect of this is very convenient, and now my alts get a cool and convenient mount. :p

They may have ran out but then, apparently there is only a limited number of them, i got no Idea exactly how many when i purchased mine they were down to 48% left. They are also BoA so all your characters get one ;) Thats a major plus because the spectral tiger was only redeemable on 1 character. This is the mount that algalon should have dropped though imo on 25 man! As the LK drops one on 25man HC which is similar.

And for the record, it's NOT limited edition - it'll always be available. It's just the way the store work where they have to put in a finite number of keys at a time but are free to generate hundreds of thousands more codes as there is demand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!