Recommended Posts

Or not limited as I thought :p

It is cool how it combines flying/normal mount so you aren't chopping and changing but I'll carry on trying to get Deathcharger in the mean time!

This mount changes speed if you have already a 310% mount if will be 310%. They should have really made the OS10/25 Drakes 310% too :( I think invincible is 310% whereas the celestial steed changes to 310% only if you already have a 310% mount in your arsenal.

On a different note, my guild finally reached the LK on 10 man normal. He seems to be owning us in the transition between Phase 1.5 - Phase 2. I think we only reached phase 2 once but people were already dead, not sure if its because people are messing up on tactics or if our raid setup is to blame :( The raid team decided against extended the raid lock also on the LK which is absurd! No on needs any more gear :( So i guess we're going to start from scratch again and work our way to the LK again.

I didnt like Tankspots guide to the fight and I have been using

http://www.guildclique.com/2010/02/15/the-definitive-lich-king-guide-10-man/

Does anyone have any other decent ones or can someone provide a few hints and tips as to how the encounter should go?

Can someone actually post the blue post... some of us are behind filters :)

Quoting Zarhym on the US forums:

The store itself does not act as a generator for loot codes, so a set number of codes had to be added to the store. That number is very high. If it's ever reached, we can add more. The item offer isn't intended to be of a limited quantity.

On a different note, my guild finally reached the LK on 10 man normal. He seems to be owning us in the transition between Phase 1.5 - Phase 2. I think we only reached phase 2 once but people were already dead, not sure if its because people are messing up on tactics or if our raid setup is to blame :( The raid team decided against extended the raid lock also on the LK which is absurd! No on needs any more gear :( So i guess we're going to start from scratch again and work our way to the LK again.

I didnt like Tankspots guide to the fight and I have been using

http://www.guildclique.com/2010/02/15/the-definitive-lich-king-guide-10-man/

Does anyone have any other decent ones or can someone provide a few hints and tips as to how the encounter should go?

Do you know what was killing people in Phase 1 or the transition? The transitions just take coordination. You have to make sure the Raging Spirits that spawn are picked up by the tanks fast and turned away from the groups. You also have to make sure people are watching the frost orbs that start coming in from the LK, and make sure that nobody runs into them if there are any left at the start of Phase 2.

We've gotten him to 20% last Sunday. We were doing well, but the Vile Spirits got to us. We now know how to handle them with our raid composition, but we didn't before. We didn't extend because people still need the badges and some gear from ICC more than the weapons off of LK and the achievement. :p

I really like the Celestial Steed and I was queued to buy one last night but it took that long that I gave up and went to bed. Today, Dalaran is full of people with it and I'm in two minds whether to bother trying again now.

I've just got my first two Tier 10 set pieces and spent a fortune enchanting and gemming them in preparation for guild progress in ICC. So far, we've got our tactics nailed for everything except Putricide (which we're only just starting on), Sindragosa and the Lich King. Hopefully we'll be getting at least Putricide down on our raid night this week before lockout.

I'll just keep farming for my Deathcharger Reigns :p

I also really want a flying carpet, but tailoring has like zero use to a paladin :p I suppose since I have echanting I could at least shard the greens/blues.

Although my mining does give me a +25 stamina boost.

edit: I've realised there's actually a decent cloak or something to do with 400ap in regards to tailoring, might be worth a look!

lol, I know how that goes. I stopped farming lately, but I was hitting that place up quite often, as well as Zul'Gurub. Would solo the two bosses with the tiger mount / raptor mount every 3 days when it'd reset. No luck on that either though. :laugh:

I just want a "horde" mount just to have it.

I've just got my first two Tier 10 set pieces and spent a fortune enchanting and gemming them in preparation for guild progress in ICC. So far, we've got our tactics nailed for everything except Putricide (which we're only just starting on), Sindragosa and the Lich King. Hopefully we'll be getting at least Putricide down on our raid night this week before lockout.

Putricide's not hard, but everybody does have to watch where they're going. If even 1 or 2 people mess up on certain things, it's pretty much game over on that fight.

On a different note, my guild finally reached the LK on 10 man normal. He seems to be owning us in the transition between Phase 1.5 - Phase 2. I think we only reached phase 2 once but people were already dead, not sure if its because people are messing up on tactics or if our raid setup is to blame

We've gone with 2 and 3 healers: 3 healers makes phase 3 much easier but the first two become very dull, especially if you use the "tank sponges vile spirits" approach.

The tip in their video about disc priests is absolutely true: it completely trivializes infest to the point that it shouldn't even do damage to 8/10 raid members (the other two are tanks who get topped off instantly anyway). Our tanking positions are different: I hope this picture is clear (i just googled for one), but if not I can probably find a screenshot or two that shows positioning better:

20100416-x2xg57u7gf5je92pf6whhbhr3g.jpg

When you get the disease you follow the blue arrow, get dispelled, and then run back to your spot. If the disease ticks then you're moving to slow: it shouldn't cause damage. We don't spend much time on the horrors during phase 1 apart from removing their enrage. Our add tank picks up ghouls when he can but we don't make a big deal about them staying on Arthas' tank. The disease does most of the work killing our horrors with a little bit of help form a hunter. Having 2 of them alive isn't a big deal.

During transition ranged kinda half-assed spreads out around the edge. Ranged (and probably your bored healers if you use 3) kills orbs when they can during the transition, while everyone else zergs down the adds and spirits. When you spawn a spirit run to the opposite side of the tank (go behind him) so that you're not in range when they become active. So long as spirits get taunted and pointed the right way they aren't too dangerous.

Without knowing exactly what's killing your raid it's hard to offer advice.

We've gone with 2 and 3 healers: 3 healers makes phase 3 much easier but the first two become very dull, especially if you use the "tank sponges vile spirits" approach.

The tip in their video about disc priests is absolutely true: it completely trivializes infest to the point that it shouldn't even do damage to 8/10 raid members (the other two are tanks who get topped off instantly anyway). Our tanking positions are different: I hope this picture is clear (i just googled for one), but if not I can probably find a screenshot or two that shows positioning better:

20100416-x2xg57u7gf5je92pf6whhbhr3g.jpg

When you get the disease you follow the blue arrow, get dispelled, and then run back to your spot. If the disease ticks then you're moving to slow: it shouldn't cause damage. We don't spend much time on the horrors during phase 1 apart from removing their enrage. Our add tank picks up ghouls when he can but we don't make a big deal about them staying on Arthas' tank. The disease does most of the work killing our horrors with a little bit of help form a hunter. Having 2 of them alive isn't a big deal.

During transition ranged kinda half-assed spreads out around the edge. Ranged (and probably your bored healers if you use 3) kills orbs when they can during the transition, while everyone else zergs down the adds and spirits. When you spawn a spirit run to the opposite side of the tank (go behind him) so that you're not in range when they become active. So long as spirits get taunted and pointed the right way they aren't too dangerous.

Without knowing exactly what's killing your raid it's hard to offer advice.

Ill check on Tuesday as we are starting from scratch again, hopefully we can reach the LK in one night as oppose to 2, if not then I probably wont be able to find out till next Tuesday.

What i noticed was that a 3rd Horror was spawning however im guessing that this is due to the OT getting the little zombie things and the Plague jumping to them instead of the horrors so it took longer for the Horrors to die. Also im guessing DPS was a bit low on the LK, we managed to get to the phase after the orbs and stuff and it took about 4 minutes, not sure if this is acceptable in terms of timing. I know we have the dps for it just probably need to tweak the tactics maybe.

Once we had to run to the edge of the platform on every attempt a 3rd shambling horror would spawn and the tank would generally die before picking up the Spirit.

Ill have to have another look at whats going on, on Tuesday.

I don't lie :happy:

lol, was only joking, but what you posted doesn't prove that you didn't buy the mount yourself. :p

Anyway, started up a twink hunter. Finally broke 20 last night, which means no more destroying the other team. 10-19 is sooo much fun compared to other brackets.

Somehow, the alliance fall apart at 80, as it seems a lot harder to win end game PvP matches. Do people suddenly forget how to play the game or what? Sitting in the 10-19 bracket, I have people that were planning on how to take the flag against a team in turtle mode. Ended up with everyone surging in, and the rogues passing the flag like a baton, using up all their sprints to escape with it lol. So many great players, none of which exist at 80. :(

Somehow, the alliance fall apart at 80, as it seems a lot harder to win end game PvP matches. Do people suddenly forget how to play the game or what? Sitting in the 10-19 bracket, I have people that were planning on how to take the flag against a team in turtle mode. Ended up with everyone surging in, and the rogues passing the flag like a baton, using up all their sprints to escape with it lol. So many great players, none of which exist at 80. :(

On our server, some of the top tier 80 PVP guilds exist, and they're -real- hardcore PVPers. Wintergrasp is always an adventure.

What i noticed was that a 3rd Horror was spawning however im guessing that this is due to the OT getting the little zombie things and the Plague jumping to them instead of the horrors so it took longer for the Horrors to die. Also im guessing DPS was a bit low on the LK, we managed to get to the phase after the orbs and stuff and it took about 4 minutes, not sure if this is acceptable in terms of timing. I know we have the dps for it just probably need to tweak the tactics maybe.

Sounds like a minor issue: Just keep an eye on his horror spawn timer - you might have to blow an extra 30 seconds to kill one before going into the phase transition (sort of like how you sometimes wait on pushing putricide into Phase 2 or 3 if a slime is due to spawn).

4 minutes is pretty reasonable for making it through phase 1: you shouldn't run in to enrage issues even if you spend 5 minutes in phase 1. The second and third phase are about twice as fast as phase one so you've got lots of time to get him to 10%.

On our server, some of the top tier 80 PVP guilds exist, and they're -real- hardcore PVPers. Wintergrasp is always an adventure.

On my server, the Alliance only wins Wintergrasp on Tuesdays (when there's so much lag that the attacker always wins). :p Most of the time, it's just a push-back to their graveyard. Pretty funny.

My guild is full of heavy gamblers: it makes content more fun when you're betting on everything that happens.

At the end of a 5-man run you might see 30 bets for 1000-5000g with things going back and forth the whole way through.

I've managed to make enough to start participating without worrying about being broke if I lose all night so I bought in to our weekly raid dungeon prediction pool:

I've got 5k at 8:1 on Lord J in ToC. If nobody wins pot is refunded.

No whammies, no whammies, no whammies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!