Recommended Posts

i was just posting a pic of my desktop, forgot to minimize the install window ^_-

That's not an excuse that works for NDAs and it's clearly explained in the welcome package.

Of course the NDA doesn't apply to people that find a link to the downloader who are dicking around

with a local server.

Anyone got a really lightweight addon that shows/tracks DPS.

Skada.

It has a nice feature where it can switch to function as a threat-meter in combat and then revert back

when you're out. If you don't care about any of the UI features then you can delete the skada window

and use it as a data source for LDB clients like statblocks.

I've been using Skada for a while now, and while every single blasted person using a damage meter reads different stats, I trust Skada just a bit more than recount. I love the fact that you don't even have to load every module that comes with it. I only load the core and the damage module because I use Omen for threat.

http://tinyurl.com/2erus8r

Anyone got any thoughts on my idea?

I had a couple instances ruined by chain pulls tonight because tanks wanted to zip through, and their inability to keep up wiped groups and people left, hence churning out this idea.

Its not the tank inability to keep up, if the tank feels he can chain pull then I would hope he is geared enough for that. This is not paying attention to the healers ability to keep the tank up.

When I tank I don't chain pull, I just pull the whole room and they get aoe'd down. I ok this with the healer before hand however.

I also don't think your idea would be considered. All it takes is someone in the group to vocally say "this is gonna be a fast run" and the person that isn't comfortable with it can leave

Its not the tank inability to keep up, if the tank feels he can chain pull then I would hope he is geared enough for that. This is not paying attention to the healers ability to keep the tank up.

When I tank I don't chain pull, I just pull the whole room and they get aoe'd down. I ok this with the healer before hand however.

I also don't think your idea would be considered. All it takes is someone in the group to vocally say "this is gonna be a fast run" and the person that isn't comfortable with it can leave

Ive been in groups where ive been the tank on my DK and constantly chain pulled with a decent healer, we could have 2 manned most of the bosses, hell i could have soloed a few as blood. Chain pulling is all about the tank imo its common now to see tanks with 50k hp in Radom HCs and even with a not so good healer a tank can chain pull and not be less than 25% of his hp most of the time. But if the group are not confortable with the idea of chain pulling then they should be vocal about it or leave.

It seems to me there are two people that matter when you're running quickly:

Tank Can they keep everything they pull from running all over the place? If not then you'll find yourself with a dead DPS or healer and the time spent bringing them back up and buffing eliminates the benefit to pulling quickly.

Healer Can they keep the tank and the occasional overzealous DPS alive without time to rest? A healer that can't keep up produces the same result as a tank that can't hold threat.

There's no real challenge to DPS at all: when the tank stops moving press your AOE button until the numbers stop popping up. Its probably easier than doing thing 'correctly' because there's no need to worry about dispelling, managing threat on single targets, crowd control, etc.

The gear of the healer and the tank combined have to add up to some minimum level: an over geared tank can make up for an under-geared healer and vice versa. There are no enrage timers worth mentioning so you can 3 AFK DPS and still clear a dungeon in 20 minutes.

It doesn't really make sense to make special kinds of queues because there's not agreement on what a 'fast' run is. Does it mean you're going 5 DPS (even though people queued as tank/healer) and just blowing up things before they die? Are you pulling 4-5 packs at a time and AOEing it down? Are you skipping every optional boss, just the ones off the "main path", or clearing everything? Is your plan to have your healer carry the tank who's in DPS gear/spec or to have the over-geared tank allow your healer to play DPS?

If you want to ensure you're getting a dungeon done in 10 minutes just for your own group and queue for a random.

I also don't think your idea would be considered. All it takes is someone in the group to vocally say "this is gonna be a fast run" and the person that isn't comfortable with it can leave

You're asking somebody to eat a 30-minute debuff plus another 0-15 minute queue time so you can save 5 minutes: it's not going to happen. Two classes have effective "veto" power over a group decision: the tank and healer. If either one decides not to play along you're not going anywhere. The DPS don't really have a choice. They can refuse to move but the tank+healer can keep moving without them.

It takes 15-minutes to kick somebody which is more than a dungeon takes so it's not really practical to enforce 'group will' on anybody, and even if you try there's no promise that your replacement will be any more accommodating.

CHain-pulling is the only way to do dungeons. They get so boring and so mindlessly mind-numbing it's annoying. Only kill bosses that are in your way. If it can be skipped it will be. Either myself or the healer is pulling the next group while the current pull is still up.

Did a a Keep run last night. Started off and pulled the entire first hallway, healer couldn't keep me up we all died, healer got kicked. New healer came in. We didn't leave combat till after the second boss (es), simply due to by-passing a few mobs. He pulled or I pulled, two thunderclaps is all that was needed to keep 'em focused on me long enough for the lone hunter who was doing 6k to kill 'em. The mage and DK in quest blues loved the hell out of it. 13 minutes from start to finish, inlcuding the wipe due to the other healer.

I've been chain-pulling since I was capable of doing it back in Vanilla and continued with it in BC and I'll never stop doing it.

If you don't like/can't keep up. There's a leave option and if you really want to experience the content (for w/e crazy reason after doing 'em for the 20th time) then find yourself 4 friends who want to do the same and you want have to worry about it.

I just stopped pugging entirely. The quality of player I encounter in a random dungeon has dropped pretty significantly. My priest got 4-piece offspec yesterday (which is now the main spec) which frees me from ever needing badges.

Tonight is "Guild Jager Night":. Excitement is higher than usual because we're also running normal-modes for achievements and it'll be the last time for a while. WIth luck I'll join the crowd of cool kids with Icebound drakes.

I just stopped pugging entirely. The quality of player I encounter in a random dungeon has dropped pretty significantly. My priest got 4-piece offspec yesterday (which is now the main spec) which frees me from ever needing badges.

Tonight is "Guild Jager Night":. Excitement is higher than usual because we're also running normal-modes for achievements and it'll be the last time for a while. WIth luck I'll join the crowd of cool kids with Icebound drakes.

I'm working on easy gems and heirloom gear and getting my 2 daily frost badges. As a tank it takes 4 seconds to queue and even if someone does suck a quick Kick and within a few seconds they are replaced. Being a tank makes the randoms so much easier to control.

Took a break from heroic wipe night and did Neck deep in vile tonight: what an epic pain in the ass. All totalled it was about an hour and a half of "not even a little bit fun". We had no end of weirdness: from valk'yrs not coming down and instead just death-gripping people up to them, spirits exploding and making us fail but not actually hitting or damaging anybody, tanks being pulled into Frostmourn, etc.

Still it's done and we just need 'light of the dawn' to be done with the game (which we're doing "okay" at: making it to phase 3).

On the plus side I have a UI that works really well and my macbook is working like a champ in 25-man raids. I'm trying to get anchors set so

that it'll automatically scale to my 1080p screen when that's plugged in. I'd like to start raiding from a coffee shop or pub now that the summer

is upon us.

On the plus side I have a UI that works really well and my macbook is working like a champ in 25-man raids. I'm trying to get anchors set so

that it'll automatically scale to my 1080p screen when that's plugged in. I'd like to start raiding from a coffee shop or pub now that the summer

is upon us.

That UI is excellent.

I tried really customizing my UI and syncing it with Dropbox between my 27" iMac and my 13" MacBook Pro, but it didn't scale well at all. I don't think many of the addons I was using supported proper anchoring (Quartz in particular is a total PITA to position). I'd love to hear what stuff you figure out when/if you get it all working so that it scales to your 1080p screen and then back down to your 1280x800 screen.

Thinking of leveling a tank, right now I have a 44 pally but kind of tired of him. How different is Druid tanking as I really love the fluff around the class.?

Druid tanking is pretty simple and doesn't really have problems with threat, even if you're slightly outgeared by people in randoms. All you really do is macro Maul into your Mangle, Swipe, FFF and Lacerate abilities and you're set. Trash is just swipe fest and boss tanking is just using Mangle and FFF on CD and keeping lacerate up. Then swip/maul in between then. I've only tanked on a pally on the PTR but it was made easy with 2 macros and I didn't find it all that fun. I enjoy druid tanking more than tanking on my DK,

Took a break from heroic wipe night and did Neck deep in vile tonight: what an epic pain in the ass. All totalled it was about an hour and a half of "not even a little bit fun". We had no end of weirdness: from valk'yrs not coming down and instead just death-gripping people up to them, spirits exploding and making us fail but not actually hitting or damaging anybody, tanks being pulled into Frostmourn, etc.

Still it's done and we just need 'light of the dawn' to be done with the game (which we're doing "okay" at: making it to phase 3).

On the plus side I have a UI that works really well and my macbook is working like a champ in 25-man raids. I'm trying to get anchors set so

that it'll automatically scale to my 1080p screen when that's plugged in. I'd like to start raiding from a coffee shop or pub now that the summer

is upon us.

Upload your UI please. I'd like to steal a few things :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!