Recommended Posts

oh, I agree there was things that were a waste of points, but you could spend them in another tree and gain more than just staying in one tree is what I was getting at.

not entirely sure how it works or if total points is reduced, but it's just a matter of spending them in one tree first. mind you, specs that use less than the minimum for the first tree should be ok, which they are now not.

i would put 31+ or w/e points into frost, i would just like to spend the first 15 or w/e into arcane for counter spell. now i have to do the opposite. annoying to me for sure.

If the new trees were setup such that I could have a solid build avoiding useless talents that provide me little to no benefit for that tree, or for throughput. then I would have no problem. But why would I put 3 points into reducing CD on a spell/ability (for example) to unlock 50% haste when I could get 50% haste from putting 2 points into a general stat ie) +10% int in a different tree? (This is an example, and there isn't talents that match this, but for general idea)

For the sake of argument assume that the 'junk' points in a tree are replaced by "increases damage done by 50%" you'd never be able to spec anything else. It doesn't matter whether those 'good' talents are in the same tree or another one: you'd have to take them you could. By locking out the "good" talents from the bottom of other trees until you've picked up some 'utility' in your main tree you actually gain flexibility.

The choice between "cooldown on fear reduced by 5 seconds" vs "remove movement emparing effects every 20 seconds" might not be particularly exciting but it certainly allows for more variation than the old choices ("Do I take Hungering Cold, or free up 4 points to increase my DPS by ~20%").

i would put 31+ or w/e points into frost, i would just like to spend the first 15 or w/e into arcane for counter spell. now i have to do the opposite. annoying to me for sure.

That's intentional: they wanted to give you fewer points to spend but make each point more powerful. They also wanted to allow you to get powerful abilities sooner while you're leveling (most classes getting 20-30 point abilities at level 10) while preventing overpowered combinations like "arcane power+icey veins"

If they left the trees open at low levels you'd just end up with the bottom filled with crap so that after you've picked all the good talents from your primary tree, you'd only have garbage available in the others. That approach makes leveling from 10-25-ish less fun because talents have a trivial impact on how you play - now your first 11 points unlock stuff that used to take 50+ levels to get access to.

As an added bonus it means that people in RDF are likely to have a somewhat sane spec because you have to actively try to spend your 31 points poorly.

not entirely sure how it works or if total points is reduced, but it's just a matter of spending them in one tree first. mind you, specs that use less than the minimum for the first tree should be ok, which they are now not.

Every tree has about 35-possible points you can spend in it, of that there are about 20 "really good" talents (stuff like divine storm, shadow form, etc) and about 5 "situational at best" points (stuff like "reduce cooldown of BOP by 60 seconds") and 10 "okay" talents ("increase damage on snared targets by 5%").

If you're a prot warrior you must spend at least 31 points in the prot tree before you're allowed to spend any points in arms or fury. Due to the way they're spread out you basically have 25 points that are obvious: every spec is going to take these points and doing that means you get all of the necessary tanking/healing/dps talents from that tree. You'll be left with a handful of points that must be spent in your primary tree and only 'situational' talents to spend them on. Once you hit 31 points in your main tree you can dump your points in the other two.

The same basic setup could have been accomplished by just putting "mandatory 5 point black hole that does nothing" at the bottom of every tree. You'd be sinking 10 points into crap which effectively "locks out' the 'good' talents from other trees until you're at a high level. The current solution is much less likely to confuse new players.

working a good farm point in the Basin about 66,49 Rainspeaker Rapids, undead spawning as fast as i kill them, and listtle bit faster then i can loot. titan shows about 57G per hour, with decent Cloth drops ( sells for 1G each Cloth on my server )

working a good farm point in the Basin about 66,49 Rainspeaker Rapids, undead spawning as fast as i kill them, and listtle bit faster then i can loot. titan shows about 57G per hour, with decent Cloth drops ( sells for 1G each Cloth on my server )

Honestly, go out to ice-crown theres the barens pits that groups of skeles and a few warlocks will walk around. It ends up being a group of about 8 mobs but if you are level 80 and decently geared you could easily take them. I, as a disc priest (so a clothie) could down the groups as long as I played it smart, you can make well over 100g an hour, have the chance on epic drops, and you get insane amounts of cloth.

Random dungeon queues yield 20g per clear from the RDF alone. Assume you win 2 blues per dungeon on average (2-3 items per boss, average of 5 bosses). Further assume that an RDF run takes at most 15 minutes:

  • 4 gems (23 justice points per heroic clear + 16 points per boss * 5 bosses) * 5g = 20g
  • 20g RDF reward * 4 = 80g
  • 8 Boss items (vendored: armor starts at 5g, weapons up to 20g) * 10g average = 80g
  • 80% chance of winning a frozen orb: 4g

185g per hour that you can absolutely bank on. On top of all that you've got random greens, cloth, greys, and the gold the mobs drop which adds up over an hour (say 50g per hour as a conservative estimate), and herbs or mining nodes in a dungeon.

If you're willing to sell gems instead of just selling them to a vendor (50g each on AH, well under market price) and convert boss drops into enchanting materials you can double your income.

Take it once step further: convert the uncut gems to cut ones and your enchanting materials into things like Berserking, 10 stats, and tuskar's vitality and you can double the value of those again. 500g per hour isn't out of the question.

If you can't or won't be a tank or healer and don't have a friend you can queue with then it still makes sense to queue as a DPS even if you can only run 2 RDF runs per hour the gold per minute is better than farming. While you wait for a queue to pop you can grind mobs in Icecrown or whatever.

kinda explains it a bit. doesn;'t totally satisfy my, but none the less thanks for taking the time.

i'm thinking i will trial and error it out and then look for cookie cutter build to pvp with at some point.

evn.'s post mostly states the same ideas, but here is the a Blue's response to similar concerns.

Talent trees too easy?

I'm not convinced these posts aren't exaggerations popping out in the wake of major change. I've tried choosing specializations for several different classes and had tough, but fun choices to make in every case. There are at least a few talents in each tree which will provide extra flavor or utility according to your play style.

Will people determine the best min/max builds and spread them to the masses? Sure. That happened before patch 4.0.1 anyway. Prior to 4.0.1 you sure did have more talents and more points to spend, but the illusion of choice isn't the same thing as true choice. So many of the choices you had were between rather boring passive talents, and the choice was usually very clear. You usually chose the obvious power-increasing talents to improve your performance. Now your choices are a little more flavorful, and the best route to take is a little more subjective. You also have a greater choice of utility and power in your glyphs, and on your gear via Reforging.

Try taking another look at your old talent trees and let me know if there were truly a lot of very compelling talents that made choosing really hard, or if there were just a bunch more branches to throw points in. Look at the trees today and let me know if there are truly no choices for you to make that might enhance the enjoyment of playing your class.

I was farming the queue, and I'm a tank, and the abundance of people that like two pull random things cause of ichy finger, people saying to slow, going slaphappy on random mob, and a host of other crap. Been looking for a way to farm money for my last 2 levels of riding so I can use my bronze drake

Been looking for a way to farm money for my last 2 levels of riding so I can use my bronze drake

"/2 tank offering instant queues, need dps + healer. The only rule is you're not allowed to pull mobs or you're kicked."

You can certainly get three DPS in a second, a healer may or may not be easy. But if you have control over your DPS

that should solve the majority of your problems.

Given the choice between 15 minute queues and waiting 5 seconds to pull a mob even the mouth-breathers in trade

chat will make the right decision.

WRT talent trees Here are the ones from 2.0

Try specing your class. You'll have to use two trees but you'll probably find out that once all the "perform better

in PVE or PVP" talents are taken you're lucky to have more than a couple to spend on junk like "increase wand damage"

I was farming the queue, and I'm a tank, and the abundance of people that like two pull random things cause of ichy finger, people saying to slow, going slaphappy on random mob, and a host of other crap. Been looking for a way to farm money for my last 2 levels of riding so I can use my bronze drake

I don't mind them doing any of those things. Hell healers who set the pace pulling are my heroe's. Mobs die so fast in dungeons that one taunt and maybe a stun and it's on you long enough. I only pull groups of 7-8 (unless there's a stun guy in there then it's less), so nobody is targeting the same target, but it's no problem to hold 'em. Rend, TC, Shockwave, TC is all that's needed per group in any instance. I also never grew out of the tab-targetting AoE tanking from BC, so I still do that which in the current state is overkill for AoE tanking.

I don't mind them doing any of those things. Hell healers who set the pace pulling are my heroe's. Mobs die so fast in dungeons that one taunt and maybe a stun and it's on you long enough. I only pull groups of 7-8 (unless there's a stun guy in there then it's less), so nobody is targeting the same target, but it's no problem to hold 'em. Rend, TC, Shockwave, TC is all that's needed per group in any instance. I also never grew out of the tab-targetting AoE tanking from BC, so I still do that which in the current state is overkill for AoE tanking.

As a single-target healer (disc priest) I hated tanks that didn't care about my mana and would get mad at me for not sucking mana out of thin air (pots and shadowfiend on cd) and would attempt to take out full rooms just because "They are that leet". On the other hand, I hate the tanks that will tell me to mana up before every fight and I end up pulling the mobs because it's going too slow. Sometimes if the dps is lacking, I'll throw up my shield and renew on the tank and join in the dps just to clear stuff.

evn.'s post mostly states the same ideas, but here is the a Blue's response to similar concerns.

meh aside from maybe one or two active spell talent spec choices(the frost mage's pet for example)i mostly preferred the spassives and passive mods to active spells such as reduced cast time and crit on frost bolt or reduction of CD's on my instants or bigger damage on them.

i'll have to see what the new tree looks like when i get in game possibly leading up to cata launch or just after.

I don't mind them doing any of those things. Hell healers who set the pace pulling are my heroe's. Mobs die so fast in dungeons that one taunt and maybe a stun and it's on you long enough. I only pull groups of 7-8 (unless there's a stun guy in there then it's less), so nobody is targeting the same target, but it's no problem to hold 'em. Rend, TC, Shockwave, TC is all that's needed per group in any instance. I also never grew out of the tab-targetting AoE tanking from BC, so I still do that which in the current state is overkill for AoE tanking.

my bro who plays a disc priest says he sets the pace and will only heal the tank. when dps qq that he isn't healing them he just says watch your aggro and let the tank do his job.

he also claimed that as a disc priest all of his spells either healed him or regened his mana or something, so he never has to to rest(or at least very rarely) so slow tanks annoy him.

this is ofc before 4.0 so i'm not sure where he stands now as he is taking a break from wow at the moment.

my bro who plays a disc priest says he sets the pace and will only heal the tank. when dps qq that he isn't healing them he just says watch your aggro and let the tank do his job.

Your brother had to be exaggerating. There is such a thing as AoE damage, and it is unavoidable on many fights (though there's generally not much in WotLK dungeon runs).

my bro who plays a disc priest says he sets the pace and will only heal the tank. when dps qq that he isn't healing them he just says watch your aggro and let the tank do his job.

he also claimed that as a disc priest all of his spells either healed him or regened his mana or something, so he never has to to rest(or at least very rarely) so slow tanks annoy him.

this is ofc before 4.0 so i'm not sure where he stands now as he is taking a break from wow at the moment.

Evn.. during the time I played my disc priest, I was single target tank and OT heals. Holy was the raid heal spec due to all the AOE heals. Disc has shield, penance, flash of light. We have like 2.. mana inefficient AOE heals, yes I can bounce around a lot, but even with high SP theres no way I could keep a group at full hp. Disc is more about preventing death with quick heals, but not about keeping multiple people alive.

As for the mana/health regen I rarely ran out of mana, and unless I had full agro I never died, and unless he is using binding heal, or just self healing Im not sure how he was gaining health from his heals. As for mana.. we have shadow fiend, hymn of (something), pots, and that's about it.

Atleast what I said above was before ICC came out I quit during the time ULD 25 was THE end raid. Im not really sure the changes that have transpired since then as I haven't gone on my priest since then. I had quit playing for 8 months or so, things have likely changed on the disc front since.

Your brother had to be exaggerating. There is such a thing as AoE damage, and it is unavoidable on many fights (though there's generally not much in WotLK dungeon runs).

from the dungeons i did in tbc and vanilla content when i still did dungeons, there wasn't alot of aoe damage in those either and outside of a few boss fights with aoe attacks that were pretty easy for dps to avoid there wasn't like any aoe from trash.

iirc the damage i ended up taking as a mage tended to be along the variety of don't stand in the bad spot that spawned under neath you in tbc boss fights and the odd reflective shield or mind control spells or that sort of thing that were either totally unavoidable or easy to avoid after your first attempt on the boss in question. there as a few aoe spells in tbc from bosses but the scripts made them obvious with enough time to run out of range.

didn't do any dungeons at all in wotlk myself, but he seemed to be talking more about pre 60 content on his current disc priest which he was leveling up previous to our discussion.

what he was talking about was dps dying because they were taking alot of damage from trash adn qqing about it because they [pulled aggro off the tank, which in my experience with pre wotlk content was pretty easy to avoid even with out an aggro meter and a good tank with only gear from leveling quests and fast kills of trash with single target dps on your average pull. although i'll note i rage quit dungeons in tbc primarily because of tanks who would lose aggro on trash pulls to the healer who was only healing the tank as needed and tanks standing in teh bad stuff even on the 4th attempt at a boss. i hear overall it tends to be better these days, except with a good fraction of DK tanks for some reason.

dunno about raids though. but i'm talking about your average 5 man leveling dungeon here.

Evn.. during the time I played my disc priest, I was single target tank and OT heals. Holy was the raid heal spec due to all the AOE heals. Disc has shield, penance, flash of light. We have like 2.. mana inefficient AOE heals, yes I can bounce around a lot, but even with high SP theres no way I could keep a group at full hp. Disc is more about preventing death with quick heals, but not about keeping multiple people alive.

As for the mana/health regen I rarely ran out of mana, and unless I had full agro I never died, and unless he is using binding heal, or just self healing Im not sure how he was gaining health from his heals. As for mana.. we have shadow fiend, hymn of (something), pots, and that's about it.

Atleast what I said above was before ICC came out I quit during the time ULD 25 was THE end raid. Im not really sure the changes that have transpired since then as I haven't gone on my priest since then. I had quit playing for 8 months or so, things have likely changed on the disc front since.

not sure what he was using and maybe i misheard him. it was either hp or mana he was getting back. and no he didn't bother with healing anyone but the tank.

this is maybe 2 months ago that he was doing this? and another 4 or so months before that he was on his 80 disc priest farming mobs in the wild and doing some casual raiding as a disc priest and the odd pvp.

i'm only relating what he told me, and tbh he's a little weird sometimes. he actually thinks that he has won every duel we've ever fought each other when it has been the other way around 99% of the time. so i'd take it with a grain of salt. :p

I find it amazing how much WoW has changed. In the past 4 years I have played it's gone from a lot of thinking, and planning from race -> class -> spec. Ensuring you have proper ammo, pet, etc. To now it's like hmm, I like the blue guys and I feel like being a bear. No thought of racials, or whatever. Hunters can spin in circles killing anything that comes close without running out of arrows.

It's just amazing how much of a change has happened to the game.

I find it amazing how much WoW has changed. In the past 4 years I have played it's gone from a lot of thinking, and planning from race -> class -> spec. Ensuring you have proper ammo, pet, etc. To now it's like hmm, I like the blue guys and I feel like being a bear. No thought of racials, or whatever. Hunters can spin in circles killing anything that comes close without running out of arrows.

It's just amazing how much of a change has happened to the game.

I find it amazing how people are surprised by progressive game design.

I'll venture to say that if the game had not changed in the past four years you would probably complain about that.

Ensuring you have proper ammo, pet, etc. To now it's like hmm, I like the blue guys and I feel like being a bear.

It's just amazing how much of a change has happened to the game.

Yeah it sure was fun finding out that the main reason my alliance priest was getting a raid spot over a nightelf was because I rolled a dwarf.

Horde side it's awesome to know that I do 100 dps less than if I'd rolled a troll priest or Orc dk.

The really fun part is rerolling or paying to race change because a choice I made years ago (by total chance) that was correct and is wrong now. The same is true of professions: putting my gathering and "non raid/pvp professions" on an alt is awesome.

Something as simple as what your level 1 starter quests are should not cripple your toon 85 levels later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!