Apple to drop sub-$500 Mac bomb at Expo


Recommended Posts

so am i to understand i could use my PC monitor with this thing? if thats the case i am wondering if they have like a spliter thing so it can like be switched between the mac and the pc like i just fick a switch when both are off and it changes the display to the mac from the pc and vice versa.

I don't know how good of a idea this is. I had a dual G4 1ghz with Jaguar on it earlier this year. I found it to be very sluggish and slow. So I sold it and went back to my PC. I now own a Dual G5 1.8 and am very happy with it. I think with this system trying to get PC users to switch may put a bad taste in their mouths if it is slow. If I didn't have other friends that got a G5 then I wouldn't have tried it again (thankfully I did). I really think this system should be a G5. Also not having a DVD writer takes away from some of the 'wow' factor of the Mac. I hope that these components are able to be swapped out with larger hard drives and DVD writers.

my $.02

~fa

so am i to understand i could use my PC monitor with this thing?  if thats the case i am wondering if they have like a spliter thing so it can like be switched between the mac and the pc like i just fick a switch when both are off and it changes the display to the mac from the pc and vice versa.

585191788[/snapback]

http://iogear.com/main.php?loc=product&Item=GCS712U

I just wish they could make a nice mid-range computer with no display.  Similar to the G5 but a little toned down.  I think this thing is going to be a little too weak for the average user.  Hopefully they will offer plenty of options on the apple store when it comes out.  I'd like one with a faster proc and the super drive.

585190289[/snapback]

I don't suppose you've ever used a Mac before...

This thing is expected to ship with a base CPU of a 1.25Ghz G4. My powerbook is a 1Ghz G4 and I have never noticed my laptop being 'slow' or 'weak' and I do a lot with it.

I hear a lot of "Apple should do this" or "They should add that". Well guess what people? The marketing teams at Apple know a hell of a lot more about selling their products than you do.

256MB is a good amount. It's enough to run most everday apps just fine, and if you need more, you're better off getting it from Crucial or Kingston anyway. Apple overcharges for their RAM.

A G4 1.25Ghz is a great processor for this machine. It'll handle anything you can throw at it, especially if you fall in the target demographic for this machine. If you're whining that this process won't handle your apps, then this machine isn't for you. Duh.

A regular CD-burner is also the right move here. It keeps the cost down, and most people still have little use for a DVD-burner.

so am i to understand i could use my PC monitor with this thing?  if thats the case i am wondering if they have like a spliter thing so it can like be switched between the mac and the pc like i just fick a switch when both are off and it changes the display to the mac from the pc and vice versa.

585191788[/snapback]

its called a KVM switch :sleep:

Hey guys, how reliable is AppleInsider?

They say on their site that this 'iMac' will be powered by a brick like power adapter, similar to those found with apple laptop.s They also claim that this unit will be sub-$600, still pretty cheap if you convert to English pounds!

link : http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=802

What's wrong with the emac?

I don't understand the purpose of this new mac machine. Apple trying to be more like PC. Whatever happened to "think different?" It's more like "think like dell" now.

Isn't the whole idea of people are trying to get away from PCs when they purchase an all in one mac computer?

585191045[/snapback]

Seeing as how Dell is extremely successful, maybe it wouldn't be bad for Apple to "think like Dell". It doesn't matter if the hardcore Apple users want to remain few in number, Apple wants to sell more units. They don't care about ****ing off a few people who think that using a Mac somehow makes them "elite". Apple just wants to sell more units and make more profit like every other business. Can you fault them for that?

What's wrong with the emac?

I don't understand the purpose of this new mac machine. Apple trying to be more like PC. Whatever happened to "think different?" It's more like "think like dell" now.

Isn't the whole idea of people are trying to get away from PCs when they purchase an all in one mac computer?

585191045[/snapback]

It's all about the display. I have my own 19" 1600x1200 display which this thing should be able to output.

I got a computer for $200 this thanksgiving, Cel (90nm @ 2.66GHz) , 512 DDR Ram, 80GB hard drive, XP Home, DVD, CD-RW. Apple won't even give you a worthless ipod mini for that much  :p  :p  :p

Therefore, this news is lame

585192610[/snapback]

All that for $200?I don't think so. I smell BS. :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!