MPAA still stricking BT sites hard!


Recommended Posts

It is an ongoing cat-and-mouse game that will never end. :whistle:

As much I hate to see these sites go down -- they are in a sense, redistributing content that people would otherwise have to pay for (especially movies now playing in theatres). So, I don't fault, or have ill feelings toward the MPAA for what they are doing. We would all do same given their predicament.

I am desperately waiting until they get owned by us SuperSwedes  :D

http://www.intac.com/~douglas/smswedfl.gif

http://static.thepiratebay.org/legal/  :whistle:

585204568[/snapback]

i always read those letters, those are absolutely brilliant. Big corportations always try to get them to remove software, and copyrighted material, and they always just fire back the swedish law.

update on Loki torrents:

$21024 in support so far, $30,000 needed

70%

File sharing will never be stopped ( Just like most of you said ) If people are that desperate to share they'll meet eachother etc.

I know of 7 markets, each that sell atleast 50 pirated cd's dvd's software cd's a day.

( Thinks back to the days when kazaa was hyped by lil children running windows ME )

:laugh:

Chris

I am more concerned about software myself. Music and DVDs are cheap, relatively, already. I never spend more than about $15 even on new movies, and music I usually pick up for less than that. Software though? $50 for every game out there! Listen, I used to buy a ton of software and most of that used to be about being able to pirate it first. Now-a-days I stear away from the pirating and simply buy only what I know is a good (no where near as much believe me). Too risky to pirate these days.

I know folks have made this argument before, but IMO, it's a solid argument. Pirating promotes the growth and purchase of hardware, but in the end the moral reality is clear - it's wrong to take what naturally shouldn't be yours. If software companies would drop their prices like ESPN NFL 2k5 tried, then this would be a moot point.

You won't if you ever find yourself needing it to protect you or your interests.  The reason it exists is because some people don't seem to be able to respect the rights and/or properties of others... such as using P2P to avoid compensating the owners of the products they've developed.

585198541[/snapback]

Excuse me but I respect the rights and properties of others. In fact, I am always glued to the TV when "24" is on but sometimes I find myself in a situation where I cannot watch the episode on TV at the current moment (test, class, etc). So what do I do? I download the episode! And you know what? Fox does not lose money by me downloading their episode because I am a fan of the show and I have all three seasons in DVD box sets (which cost quite a bit might I add). In fact, I didn't start watching 24 until I had downloaded the entire first season to watch it and see what it was about and then I was hooked. So if anything, Fox GAINED the sales of three seasons PLUS any future ones released because I was able to download the TV show online.

I would understand the argument with movies and downloading but regarding TV shows, I don't see why there should be a problem. If someone goes out of their way to watch the show on TV, why should they be punished if they miss an episode and try to catch up by downloading it on BT?

DVD's and CD's are too expensive.

it's hard to find 3 new DVD's that are less then $100 all together (In Canada.)

585205192[/snapback]

That still doesn't give you the right to steal. Just because you can't afford something is your problem, and you know they would probably tell you the high prises are because people are stealing and there losing revenue from it. Look at it this way, would you steal a Lamborghin Gallardo or a Porsche Carrera GT just because you can't afford them?
The problem isn't P2P. And there are many independent studies which actually show that it isn't. In fact many of them show that P2P actually increases sales. The problem is the pirates in Asia which sell this on the street. The MPAA is acting like the Bush Whitehouse and going after Saddam instead after who they should be going after which is bin Ladin.

585203745[/snapback]

so what you are saying is that because of bit torrent, the movie / music / software industries arent losing any money at all. i find that very hard to believe. i'd like to see your sources that say that p2p is not PART of the problem.

hey, i'm with you guys in hoping that the bit torrent technology stays around. yes i've used suprnova, yes i've used lokitorrent, yes i've used pirates bay. i'm just saying that we are responsible for what is happening also.

edit: the pirtates bay's legal responses crack me up. what a great section to add. i especially like the graph that shows the ratio of legal threats to torrents taken down. haha.

That still doesn't give you the right to steal. Just because you can't afford something is your problem, and you know they would probably tell you the high prises are because people are stealing and there losing revenue from it. Look at it this way, would you steal a Lamborghin Gallardo or a Porsche Carrera GT just because you can't afford them?

585205306[/snapback]

theres a HUGE difference.

also i didnt say i ONLY steal, i do buy movies and cd's all the time, but to waste $25 on a CD i only want for 1 song? what a waste.

and there is a HUGE difference between Data on a disc, and a CAR!

you can NOT compare the two.. it is insane.

People sell you a disc, with a movie on it, and they make the $20M from it at the box office, DONT GET GREEDY! not every movie must be sold... by the origional.

last but not least, people steal cars every day. same with movies.

Wrong, Loki is like the newspaper's movie listings.

585200955[/snapback]

What newspapers do you get ? Ones from the future. :blink:

I haven't never seen a newspapers movie listing page that lets you press on the movie listing and then you get to watch it for free and keep.

thats some amazing technology. ;)

Excuse me but I respect the rights and properties of others. In fact, I am always glued to the TV when "24" is on but sometimes I find myself in a situation where I cannot watch the episode on TV at the current moment (test, class, etc). So what do I do? I download the episode! And you know what? Fox does not lose money by me downloading their episode because I am a fan of the show and I have all three seasons in DVD box sets (which cost quite a bit might I add). In fact, I didn't start watching 24 until I had downloaded the entire first season to watch it and see what it was about and then I was hooked. So if anything, Fox GAINED the sales of three seasons PLUS any future ones released because I was able to download the TV show online.

I would understand the argument with movies and downloading but regarding TV shows, I don't see why there should be a problem. If someone goes out of their way to watch the show on TV, why should they be punished if they miss an episode and try to catch up by downloading it on BT?

585204884[/snapback]

My statement wasn't meant as any sort of attack on you... what I was trying to convey was the notion that were you ever in a position where someone violated your person or property you wouldn't "hate the legal crap", because it's what provides you the ability to make things right.

Imagine how you would feel in this scenario: You spend a couple of years creating something... a product that you've invested thousands (if not millions) of dollars to develop. Now it turns out that this product is REALLY easy to make copies of, and can be distributed over the Internet in very little time. Would you be perfectly fine with thousands of people helping themselves to your product without paying you anything at all??? Remember, YOU'RE the one who put in all the work... YOU'RE the one who's taken all the financial risk... and YOU'RE the one who could lose the rights to your product if you DON'T take any action to protect your rights to it.

I agree that, in your case, there was arguably no harm done to Fox when you downloaded the first season of "24"... but let?s look at this from a broader perspective:

1) You certainly know that in all likelihood a great number of the people that downloaded that series DIDN'T purchase the DVDs, or ever contribute anything towards Fox as a means of compensation.

2) You could have rented the 1st season DVDs to satiate your initial interest in the show... downloading them was not your only option, it was just the cheapest and easiest.

3) TV networks have legal obligations to their affiliate stations, which could adversely be affected by excessive unauthorized distribution. These same distributions could also result in lost revenue when they sell the series for international markets.

4) Even if it could be proved that unauthorized P2P distributions resulted in higher revenues overall, don't you think the owner of the property should ultimately have the right to say that they don't want it to occur? Don't you have the right to say what you want to happen with your property, or would you be fine if people you don't know were to show up at your house whenever they liked to watch TV, use your computer, or take a dump in your toilet???

I'm not saying I don't understand your situation, I just think there's more to the issue that should be considered.

;);)

yes there is lost revenue in these, we are small people who make no more then $25,000 a year if not less. the movie makers make $40M (around that) so who are they to complain?

DVD's and CD's are too expensive.

it's hard to find 3 new DVD's that are less then $100 all together (In Canada.)

585205192[/snapback]

It's a tough case to make when you seemed to have found a way to spend a couple thousand (best guess) on your computer, let alone the monthly cost of Internet access.

You seem to be able to come up with the money for the things you want... at least for those that you can't get for free via the Internet.

I know that it's legal for you to do this in Canada because you've already paid your tax on the blank media, but there are plenty of people in the world who use the same excuse that are not in compliance with their local laws.

What newspapers do you get ? Ones from the future.  :blink:

I haven't never seen a newspapers movie listing page that lets you press on the movie listing and then you get to watch it for free and keep.

thats some amazing technology. ;)

585206846[/snapback]

The newspaper tells you where to go and get it, there are a lot of people who like to sneak into movies without paying, that is their choice and not the newspapers.

I never used BitTorrent to download movies, mostly just TV shows that I couldn't get here in the USA.

Why does the BBC & Channel4 make really good shows? I want them here!

I've also just downloaded episodes of TV shows on Discovery Channel (American Chopper, Mythbusters, just to name a few) because I missed them or some other reason... I've deleted most of them as of recent, since you can practically turn on Discovery Channel and see a rerun of what I had downloaded, and with my DVR, why should I waste space on my hard drive?

I'm not saying it's right, but for shows that don't play over here, I'll do what I have to do to get to view these shows.

Edit: Well, besides moving to England... although I would if I could.

Edited by Bling3k12
People sell you a disc, with a movie on it, and they make the $20M from it at the box office, DONT GET GREEDY!  not every movie must be sold... by the origional.

585206657[/snapback]

You really don't hold the moral high ground here... the fact that you obtain copies of someone else's property without their permission or compensation is a demonstration of your greed.

how is it stealing when someone gives it to you? Don't be a RIAA or MPAA pawn.  :cool:

See #1: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=stealing

^ money. the root of all evil, especially the RIAA and MPAA. Politicians as well, and lawyers...etc..

What a burden you must bear... what with being the last moral person on earth. And here I thought Ghandi was dead!!!

:p

yes there is lost revenue in these,  we are small people who make no more then $25,000 a year if not less.  the movie makers make $40M (around that) so who are they to complain?

585207059[/snapback]

Well, for starters, they're the owners of the property.

Tell me, how many millions of dollars did you risk producing the movie?

Also, at what income level does it become OK for someone to steal your stuff? Does a homeless person have the right to take YOUR stuff? Compared to him YOU"RE rich!!!

:cool:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!