Recommended Posts

No, I've tried that. I even popped in ERD Commander to see if i can change the password and still no luck.

It's not a huge deal, I'm okay with reinstalling XP if I need to... but this is a weird problem.

585338379[/snapback]

If it was caused by a patch included in AutoPatcher, it truely is weird.

I had to take my mirror off apache...it was absolutely dead to normal web traffic.

you're welcome to use these ftp links if you like:

ftp://cpugeniusmv.is-a-geek.org/apxp/Auto...an2005_Full.exe

ftp://cpugeniusmv.is-a-geek.org/apxp/Auto...an2005_Lite.exe

If it was caused by a patch included in AutoPatcher, it truely is weird.

585338538[/snapback]

I was able to get back into my account using "Offline NT Password & Registry Editor" by blanking the password.

My guess was it could have been the User Accounts 2 module maybe? I don't know because the password was working just fine before I installed autopatcher.

I was able to get back into my account using "Offline NT Password & Registry Editor" by blanking the password.

My guess was it could have been the User Accounts 2 module maybe? I don't know because the password was working just fine before I installed autopatcher.

585339460[/snapback]

user accounts 2 just adds a control panel item that gives access to a second user configuration area, should be the cause of the problem

I don't get the size... I mean - on a fresh XP installation - should I first go for the last version, and then this one?

Anyway - appreciate your work on this very much :D

Big Thanx !

585339200[/snapback]

This is for Windows XP SP2 systems. Previous releases were for XP SP1.

someboday can help me to slove this problem?

585339248[/snapback]

it is really the problem. im using server 2003 rc1, it couldn't extract any more,, just popped up a msgbox as i mentioned before. and when i extracted the files under longhorn and come back to 2003 build 1289, the same problem came up as demonstrated in the legend.

but you can install separated patches despite the wizard.

what was the wrong? and how to resolve that ?!

post-87314-1106470933.jpg

Ok I've turned the link to the full edition into an FTP link as the same is happening to me as it has happened to cpugenious and as far as I know, Storm.

The link is...

ftp://homerserv.net/pub/AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe

raptor could you change the link in the first post to that please? Able to be downloaded with Firefox & IE to my knowledge.

Since this version has the ability to create modules, Just how is that possible.

I mean is there instructions on how to do this?

On a side note; Great Update though. Been using since the first one.  It's been a lifesaver more than once.

Thanks

585338723[/snapback]

Theres a post on AutoPatcher's Blog that walks you through how to create modules :)

Hey guys im havin kinda the same prob w/ the patcher.. im runnin on windows media center edition 2005...

it shows up this right here when i run the autorun:

post-87314-1106470933.jpg

then when i press whts supposed to be the "accept" or "yes" button on the left, it pops up a window sayin "Run-time error '55' File already open". Anyone have any suggestions? :(

Thx

I really cant understand why translations won't load. I just installed tested AutoPatcher on a fresh install of Media Center 2005, and there was no problem at all. :s I even tried unregistering the ocx and dll files, but it would still work...

Hmm, I'm in the process of installing AutoPatcher 2005. So far the download went well, and the extraction too, but I cannot understand why on the first page of this thread the MD5 does not match mine.

78A061F2813A5DAF61CA9C6869F9927E

I downloaded the file from the torrents aj-design created. I don't think that matters.

edit: I just finished installing AutoPatcher 2005 on a WinXP Home Edition with SP2 (fresh installation), and I did not have any username created on the Welcome window, when I click FINISH to reboot computer after AutoPatcher installation, the Welcome window came up with the name OWNER, I clicked on it and logged me to windows. :huh:

I read someone saying something about the system asked for a password after installing AutoPatcher. It did not ask me for password, but it did change the welcome window and added a username. :wacko:

Edited by EZRecovery
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!