Recommended Posts

In first, tanks for your existing :D and sorry for my english..

Im sugesting you to use a sfx off 7-Zip to distribute AutoPatcher. Because i have compact AutoPatcher XP Jan2005 Lite in SFX of 7z format using Ultra compression, dictionary size 255 (with 7-Zip 4.14 Beta), and final size is 25,1 MB (the original have 30,7 MB).

The reduction of size is helpfull for quick downloads, and for the hosters.. ;) and finally for the users.. ;)

Tanks in advance.. and sorry for my english..

My web site was suspended because of mirroring this! WTF?! I am signed up with their highest account hosting plan (a $40/mo plan)! So I guess you will need to remove my mirror :( Lol I guess their server crashed because of too many requests

Hi,

We have had to suspend your account ? statuspc.com

The server had to be rebooted as it was failing to respond due to the extremely high number of requests to download the files from ap.statuspc.com.

The account will be unsuspended on the conditions that you either remove the file from download sites such as fileforum.betanews.com or the file is removed from your account.

Regards,

--------

IdleServ Support

http://www.idleserv.net

That shows ya the quality and desire for AutoPatche;);)

Lol: attached is my servers graph at idleserv:

post-54000-1106336492.jpg

Edited by SkyyPunk

Not sure what forum to post this in but APXP is/has been/always will be awesome! How do you select(check the box) for modules listed in AP-it loads the modules I want to load but half of em are unchecked. Old APXP would let you save as defaults... Any reply would be great!

hu ?? great Job sure. But I download it and install it ok ? then I launch the AutoPatcher in X:\\Program Files etc...

and I get an Active X error ?!!!

I never used it before, its the first time, I want some help to install the M$ Update...

Thanks a lot !!

(I'm french....)

Edited by dreamon

and to be fair to idleserv, they were very nice about the whole situation. They said they dont care about the bandwidth, but because the server was uploading at 3MB/s (3 megabytes/s), it just crawled and crashed because it was also getting many requests...I think I will be moving to a dedicated server :)

Hey,

Sorry if this was already brought up, I didn't see it anywhere. But, I downloaded the full version.. from the first mirror, and installed it and it went to C:\autopatcher

Then I ran the Exe and it came up and said that It was for SP1, and that I had SP2 or something. I am added the pic as an attachment so you can see what I'm talking about. I thought this was mainly made for SP2? Did I get the wrong file or something? Thanx for the help.

Chris post-52806-1106340484_thumb.jpg

I downloaded it from https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=274125

down where the links start, the first link for the FULL VERSION "MIRROR PROVIDED BY HOMER" that is the one that I clicked on. Isn't there a program that can check the MD5 of files? I know I used to have it, but I can't find it anywhere.

EDIT---

Also, this is the name of the EXE that it extracted to my Autopatcher Dir.

AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe

Which is Jan 2005

Hmmm that is weired

EDIT AGAIN- hehe

sorry, that is the name of the file that I downloaded.. not the name of the file that was added to my autopatcher Dir

I downloaded it from https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=274125

down where the links start, the first link for the FULL VERSION "MIRROR PROVIDED BY HOMER" that is the one that I clicked on. Isn't there a program that can check the MD5 of files? I know I used to have it, but I can't find it anywhere.

585333820[/snapback]

Well, that link points to Jan2005 release... But in the screenshot, you are running an old release... Maybe you got confused somehow?

When the download finished, did you run the file? If so, did you install it with default options? It should be in C:\Program Files\AutoPatcher...

Well, that link points to Jan2005 release... But in the screenshot, you are running an old release... Maybe you got confused somehow?

When the download finished, did you run the file? If so, did you install it with default options? It should be in C:\Program Files\AutoPatcher...

585333841[/snapback]

Yea, the name of the file that I downloaded was AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe also.. weired

I am goin to try to download it again from another mirror. But about the MD5 thing, isn't there a way to check the MD5 of a file? A program to do it or something, that way I will know if it is the right file or not the next time I download it.

ok, I found a program that checks the MD5 of a file, It is called acutefinder.. and I have downloaded it again from another Mirror. I am goin to install it again after I get back from town. I will let you know if something is wrong again.. Thanx for all the help.

dreamon: I really have no idea what the problem could be. You could try this:

1. You got admin rights?

2. Under AutoPatcher folder, there's a bin folder. In the bin folder, select all files

3. Now, copy them over to your system32 folder (usually C:\Windows\system32) replacing any older files.

4. If the same error comes up, go Start -> Run and type (exactly as you see it):

regsvr32 "%systemroot%\system32\ssubtmr6.dll"

Again, Start - Run:

regsvr32 "%systemroot%\system32\comctl32.ocx"

And lastly Start -Run:

regsvr32 "%systemroot%\system32\mscomctl.ocx"

It *should* work.

LovingU & Keldyn:

I tested AutoPatcher on Windows 2003 a little while ago. No problems whatsoever. Everything went as expected.

1. Installer started perfectly, installed normally.

2. AutoPatcher *started* perfectly, detected Windows 2003 Standard (English).

3. AutoPatcher loaded only what's available for Windows 2003 from the XPSP2 release (yes, some patches work on 2003 as well).

Here's the screenshot: Notice that some patches which only apply to XP SP2 do not show up. However, things which apply to 2003, show up normally!

post-10533-1106343723_thumb.jpg

I too am having a small problem. From reading one of the earlier posts, you (Raptor) said you could just burn the C:\Program File\Autopatcher Dir to a CD for offline use. When I did that I got this error message:

Run-time Error 5

Invalid Procedure Call or Argument

Also what OS's are supported?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!