Recommended Posts

^I'm gonna download another copy from the torrent aj-design created and match the MD5. Since I made an image of the computer, I'm gonna ghost it and install the new copy I download of AutoPatcher (hopefully I will get the same MD5 number).

Here is a sshot of my previous post since I could not edit it.

post-40930-1106511213_thumb.jpg

Edited by EZRecovery

For people with the problem where the autorun text comes out blank!

i solved the problem.. although its not a very convinient solution...

my xp is english version, however, the non-unicode languge chosen for it was chinese. it seems that the autopatch won't work if its anything other than english.

So all you gota do is switch it back to english in the Reigional and Lanuge Options...

I hope the developers would get a fix on that asap!

later~

For people with the problem where the autorun text comes out blank!

i solved the problem.. although its not a very convinient solution...

my xp is english version, however, the non-unicode languge chosen for it was chinese. it seems that the autopatch won't work if its anything other than english.

So all you gota do is switch it back to english in the Reigional and Lanuge Options...

I hope the developers would get a fix on that asap!

later~

585343704[/snapback]

Thanks for pointing out this workaround. I'll see if I can fix this. I'm guessing it's something in the unicode decoder...

edit: actually, mine is set to Greek and I have no problems at all... we will have to see which languages are affected...

Edited by nw_raptor

Second copy of Autopatcher MD5 is 9584E9F479963D9B75411169FC356453. Now it matched.

The first copy I downloaded it at school on Friday morning, nw_raptor, why different MD5 in a couple of days?

edit: The first copy was created 1/21/2005 @ 11:03am. Second copy was created 1/23/2005 @ 2:50pm.

OK, I have done a quick solution to the translation problem. Not sure if this will solve the problem, but it should make it better...

Download the following file, extract the archive replacing the old AutoPatcher.exe.

AutoPatcher.zip

Edited by nw_raptor
OK, I have done a quick solution to the translation problem. Not sure if this will solve the problem, but it should make it better...

Download the following file, extract the archive replacing the old AutoPatcher.exe.

585344269[/snapback]

Problem sloved, thank u~

Can I ask a few questions...

When i ran it, i went thru each menu myself and deseleted what i didnt want to be installed, right? right... Then I hit update and it runs and finishes, I reboot and what do I see on my computer? Things I did not ever want.

Google Toolbar for IE? Why was this even installed?

PowerMenu? What does it do in the first place?

And a few extra icons in the control panel that i DID NOT ask for.

So please tell me. Why did it install these extra options that I did not even find the option to disabling in the autopatcher menu?

edit: So I see it was in the "whats included list" but why couldnt I have had the option to NOT install these things? And is there a way to undo all changes done by autopatcher?

Edited by Xtreme $niper

These are the matches I created the torrents from:

9584e9f479963d9b75411169fc356453 AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe <-File

9584E9F479963D9B75411169FC356453 -Actual MD5

bc6c4b8eea9a5c24ac1b148aa9cc3d3f AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Lite.exe <-File

BC6C4B8EEA9A5C24AC1B148AA9CC3D3F -Actual MD5

They match exactly, so I'm not sure why it would be any different...I always seem to get the early copy and not the final copy with EVERY release though...I'm out of the loop when it comes to last minute changes though usually...

These are the matches I created the torrents from:

9584e9f479963d9b75411169fc356453    AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full.exe <-File

9584E9F479963D9B75411169FC356453 -Actual MD5

bc6c4b8eea9a5c24ac1b148aa9cc3d3f    AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Lite.exe <-File

BC6C4B8EEA9A5C24AC1B148AA9CC3D3F -Actual MD5

They match exactly, so I'm not sure why it would be any different...I always seem to get the early copy and not the final copy with EVERY release though...I'm out of the loop when it comes to last minute changes though usually...

585345904[/snapback]

I think I got an early copy too, how? I dunno, but I will do another installation on a fresh WinXP OS with the second copy of Autopatcher I got dated 1/23/2005.

My mistake, please discard my post above... I am just blind.. Anyways, I was just wondering if there was a way to uninstall things that were installed by autopatcher through autopatcher?

585346084[/snapback]

I don't think so Xtreme $niper. You will have to use Add/Remove Programs to revome what you don't want.

HI!

After "Loading modules.." I've

Run-time error '35601':

Element not found

In File monitor I see:

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\MSCmCENU.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\MSCmENU.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\1033\MSCmC.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

OS: Windows XP Pro Sp2

Language: Polish (switch to English)

I search net for these files but I can't find them :no:

HI!

After "Loading modules.." I've

Run-time error '35601':

Element not found

In File monitor I see:

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\MSCmCENU.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\MSCmENU.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

... AutoPatcher.exe ... c:\windows\system32\1033\MSCmC.DLL ... FILE NOT FOUND

OS: Windows XP Pro Sp2

Language: Polish (switch to English)

I search net for these files but I can't find them  :no:

585349771[/snapback]

Ignore those File Monitor entries; Executables can point to virtual files (It's the simplest I can put it)...

Is the operating system language Polish or is that just the Regional Settings?

nw_raptor:

Could the Module Editor panel be made scrollable or resizable??

The full panel does not show on my laptop. Kinda makes it hard to enter/revirew modules.

Penn Boy

585350039[/snapback]

I'll see what I can do :)

it is really the problem. im using server 2003 rc1, it couldn't extract any more,, just popped up a msgbox as i mentioned before. and when i extracted the files under longhorn and come back to 2003 build 1289, the same problem came up as demonstrated in the legend.

but you can install separated patches despite the wizard.

what was the wrong? and how to resolve that ?!

585340880[/snapback]

I believe I had the same problem.

I had made a shortcut on my desktop to the file. I had to add the path of that fie to the "Start In" field property f the shortcut.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!