?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

I've been conditioned to hate IE with every fibre of my being.

The last few years have been hell for me with round the clock spyware, popups, BHOs, you name it. And I gave up IE a few years earlier - all that was from other peoples PCs which I had to fix.

I saw first hand, just how sucky IE really is and what sort of cack handed coding MS expects to sell. I mean, come on... a virus in a .jpg? How many moronic programmers do you need for that?

And there is still code from the original mosaic browser in there! I'm not using 10 year old hardware - damned if I'm using ten year old software.

- probably activex taken off too

585738331[/snapback]

i don't think MS will ever get rid of that. they're using activex even more now with things like Genuine Advantage (the validation) for all downloads and microsoft update.

for them the great benefit is being able to take control of someone's pc completely. what they don't/should realise is that that is why it's such a security risk.

i'm not voting because i would switch to IE only if the following are added:

- w3 standards compliance support

- transparent png support

- probably activex taken off too

585738331[/snapback]

- it will get better, but every browser has its share of issues. it's a damn shame too, because it's amazing what one can do using pure XHTML/CSS/JavaScript, but most of it goes down the toilet because of all the bug fixes you have to add in and all the non-fixable bugs you have to work around.

- reportedly, this will happen, which is great, because we'll finally be able to throw away the transparent GIF. The web will be such a nicer place when all browsers support alpha transparency in PNG images

- never happenin'. sorry. Too many enterprise-level web apps utilize ActiveX. ActiveX and IE are together forever, as it were.

- reportedly, this will happen, which is great, because we'll finally be able to throw away the transparent GIF.  The web will be such a nicer place when all browsers support alpha transparency in PNG images

585740203[/snapback]

While I agree that transparent PNGs are great, gifs are still going to be around for awihle, I think. If you've got a small image that doesn't need alpha transparency, why make it a png? And besides, a lot of people still use dial-up connections, and usually pngs aren't very dial-up friendly (yes, I know it's a bit ironic I'm using a transparent png in my sig).

While I agree that transparent PNGs are great, gifs are still going to be around for awihle, I think. If you've got a small image that doesn't need alpha transparency, why make it a png? And besides, a lot of people still use dial-up connections, and usually pngs aren't very dial-up friendly (yes, I know it's a bit ironic I'm using a transparent png in my sig).

585750682[/snapback]

PNG was created to replace GIF (due to patents) and a gif image will compress just as well as a png (cause png's uses zip compression, so single color images compress really small)

Basically, PNG will replace GIF, there is just no need for it (after IE implemements it, if they do)

I prefer IE ... cause FireFox is so retarded in displaying Asian characters ...

585695800[/snapback]

Really? Have you even tried changing the languages setup or the encoding?

IE is 50/50 on asian texts, some come out garbled, some are perfect.

On firefox, all is fine though, as expected.

I can't wait to see IE 7 in action, but ie needs a lot of basic features to really be a contender for me.

I use both firefox & maxthon; firefox for most things, maxthon for small pages like neowins stuff, wup, and some news sites. Other than that, I let ff handle everything the web can throw at me, including those badly build 'optimised for ie1+' pages. i hope they discontinue the support for coloured scrollbars . . .

I use IE in the form of Maxthon and have for years and years and years. Why? Because Firefox is a bloated memory hog and I don't like the other choices.

Will I ever switch? No, because there is really no reason to. I have never had a serious security issue and don't see it happening in the near future.

Are there some people that should switch? Sure there are... but mainly people who don't know how to get on the internet without their hands being held.

:D

  • 4 weeks later...

I would download and install IE7 but Firefox will remain my primary browser of choice.

And to all the people that get tired of having to download a full installer for an upgrade

Firefox 1.1 will have binary patching .. so only what needs to be updated will be updated

my stance on IE and MS can be read on my spreadfirefox blog here

I would download and install IE7 but Firefox will remain my primary browser of choice.

And to all the people that get tired of having to download a full installer for an upgrade

Firefox 1.1 will have binary patching .. so only what needs to be updated will be updated

my stance on IE and MS can be read on my spreadfirefox blog here

585905483[/snapback]

yes. YES! spread Firefox feel the LOVE!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!