?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

Some things about Internet Explorer that people want but it already has:

--Standards Support

--> It supports HTML 4.0 perfectly in strict mode in IE6. The web developers have to tell it to use strict for it to work in strict, and many places where IE6 is "broken" is only because it is being forced to render in quirks mode. However, they do need to upgrade its support of the standards.

--User Defined Stylesheets

--> Been a feature since IE 4.0. It just isn't advertised to well ;).

Internet Options, General tab, Accessibility button. See the User defined stylesheet area? Yep, been there forever.

Not enough choices for the poll IMO.

I'd switch ONLY if IE7 had tabs, adblock, mouse gestures and had fixes to issues like png transparency support, CSS rendering, DOM and DHTML issues; OR if MS bought Firefox/Opera/KMeleon and called it IE7 :)

585913385[/snapback]

ZeroHertz speaks the truth. :)

Actually, when IE7 comes out, I'd probably use it for a while and then run Ad-Aware to see if there's any junk. Using Firefox has really made Ad-Aware have nothing to catch, so this will be a test for IE7.

But really, they need to not allow script/coding errors to continue and stuff like that. I don't have a problem with IE7 being more strict with coding at all.

No.

Because as soon as IE becomes as popular as it once was, then Microsoft will just stop development again.

I like Mozilla. They care about standards support, they care about user feedback, they care about non-microsoft platforms, and they have a much faster development pace then IE does.

The poll doesn't offer the right options - for me I would switch back if it was a better product, but not just because it is "IE". I use Firefox because it suits my browsing habits, but I would happily switch to another browser if it was more practical.

Not enough choices for the poll IMO.

I'd switch ONLY if IE7 had tabs, adblock, mouse gestures and had fixes to issues like png transparency support, CSS rendering, DOM and DHTML issues; OR if MS bought Firefox/Opera/KMeleon and called it IE7 :)

585913385[/snapback]

Well we can all dream of Microsoft creating the perfect browser but, now it's time to come back to reality...? :D

first i wonder why anyone cares about who uses what browser

second i use many browsers and i generally like most of them....

Netscape8 is a good browser. i've just downloaded it and I'll give it a positive review.. It's more resource intensive than firefox but it has a clean design and is overall appealing and without adware or those annoying download AOL links everywhere.

ZeroHertz, more options? :blink: personally I think theres too many options in this poll, it needs to be simple, and to the point

IE 7?

x I'll try IE 7, it'll become my main browser.

x Probably try IE 7, but will still prefer using alternative browser

x Continue to use Existing/Alternative Browser

but thats just me :)

IE 8.0 is out? the way this thread was started, I was beginning to think i missed something.......h*ll no! Why go backwards? Mozilla FireFox 4 me, all the way, baby!!!

(smart *sses insert opinion here) :rolleyes:

I will only switch if IE7 is exceptionally good, at the moment I consider FF exceptionally good, so IE has pretty big shoes to fit in.

I'd convert if it was standards compliant, more secure then FF, and overall more customisable and better.

Slim chance of that happening tbh.

while I don't remember where I read it but I did read that CSS2 support was only going to be partial at best. .so imo I'm not even gonna bother with it. .for casual 'net surfers web standards really don't matter much ..only for developers .. but as long as MS doesn't get on that bandwagon people are still gonna have problems with sites displaying properly. We shouldn't have to wait for Longhorn for IE to be separated from the core of the OS like it's been since 98SE...yeah you can remove IE but you can't even use add/remove programs ...for those that don't know when you open add/remove programs it's all html...You can get hit with worms and viruses even using a different browser only because IE is installed everytime you install Windows 98, 98SE, ME, 2000 and now XP ... MS shouldn't have waited this long to separate IE from the OS .. but they have and it's been a wait that's been going on too long

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!